-
For sure, at least in the videos I've watched. His way of talking about "theory" is very idiosyncratic and (IMO) adds layers of verbiage abstruseness that make him very hard to follow.
Originally Posted by jzucker
It often strikes me that way, too.
Originally Posted by jzucker
But wasn't Coltrane much more versed in theory and analysis than those guys?
Originally Posted by jzucker
-
05-06-2026 11:53 AM
-
I have no idea why this young man did it.Perhaps this brought him infamous popularity.
Originally Posted by charlieparker
I don't know how many saxophonists there are in US.
-
he was, he actually studied music in college. But it's interesting that he didn't recognize what mccoy was doing because it wasn't taught in formal theory and wasn't something he had heard before. Mccoy just made that !@#$ up and nowadays it's a common part of jazz theory. Again, the "theory" changed to accommodate the players. Not the other way around.
Originally Posted by John A.
-
It seems to me that jazz theory is closely related to the practice of jazz.
Proof of this are the books written by David N. Baker.
f.ex.How to play Be-Bop vol 1-3...or "A Creative Approach to Practising JAZZ"
Interesting books are also written by Walt Weiskopf...A lot of useful knowledge.
-
His opinion doesn't make sense because it's based on an irrational personal bias, he obviously doesn't know Wayne Shorter's music catalog. Shorter wasn't always Mr. Avante Garde, he started out as a fairly straight ahead bop player and evolved from there.
Originally Posted by kris
-
Yes. There is a lot of his CD recordings on youtube.
Originally Posted by Mick-7
-
It seems to me that there is quite a lot of theoretical knowledge in this video.
Originally Posted by jzucker
A dozen or so years ago I made an exact transcription of the notes that John plays in this video.
Scofield's jazz theory in one hour from 1983.
-
[QUOTE=kris;1462582]It seems to me that there is quite a lot of theoretical knowledge in this video.
A dozen or so years ago I made an exact transcription of the notes that John plays in this video.
Scofield's jazz theory in one hour from 1983.
I may have part of that transcription..The Diminished scale..it kept me busy for a year or two..
-
[QUOTE=wolflen;1462678]
This hour-long video by Scofield is the essence of jazz theory.
Originally Posted by kris
But in order to understand it accurately, you need to get to know in detail the notes that John plays.
Scofield plays melodic lines in a very natural way.He is a brilliant improviser.
He shows it all in a very casual way.
The way of thinking and mastering the material thoroughly takes years of work.
Someone may think it's just an hour.The theory is easy, it's easy... maybe... But this is just an illusion.
A conscious jazz musician is able to put all this into practice correctly. And that's the point.
In 1983 this video was made and I saw John in Warsaw, and in the same year he played with Miles Davis.
In 1986, John played my guitar during a short jam session at a local jazz club – my legs were "bending".
Best
Kris
-
He definitely does know.
Originally Posted by Mick-7
Quite a smart guy. Top tier player on the scene at the time. Very very bad with his own PR, apparently.
-
I'm curious... if this young man does not like and does not respect Shorter, has he ever played a composition written by Shorter?
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
According to many jazzmen, Shorter was a brilliant composer.
"Regarded as one of the greatest composers in jazz history, Wayne Shorter has written more than 200 pieces, dozens of which have become modern standards."
-
why not let it go. it has been dicussed ad nauseum and the guy basically ruined his career. musicians say things and have opinions, it's always been that way.
Originally Posted by kris
it is the internet that fucks it up for everybody. i mean this shit is 13 years old. as if wayne shorter needed any defending from the foot soldiers.
-
Oh, I didn't even look at the date, it is ancient news, thought it was recent.
Originally Posted by djg
-
+1
Originally Posted by djg
13 years is a long period of time.
Maybe this guy has changed his mind over the years.
I hope so.
-
Mad at theory. It definitely seems like he knew theory, quite deeply. Maybe he didn't know everything when you studied with him. Not everyone knows everything.
-
This video is from 10 years ago.
Originally Posted by Strat-itis
You would have to ask Jack when he studied with Pat Martino.
To tell the truth, we learn jazz all our lives.
-
They brought it up because they thought I'd said Liebman was noisy (which he definitely can be). Unfortunately I never said that, I said Liebman was a bit noisy for me, which is not the same thing.
Whereupon I was deluged with lots of examples of him playing softer stuff like ballads.He's a very good talker and a good teacher. But I don't like his playing (I've listened to quite a bit of it), I find it a bit noisy for me
I was merely expressing a dislike of raucous music, that's all. That's a personal preference and a matter of taste. If other people like it, that's fine, it's up to them, I don't care.
It's the usual snobby jazz police attitude rearing its head. They seem to think that because they enjoy loud stuff there's something wrong with those who don't.
Mind you, we're not speaking Kris' first language here and he may have missed the difference between 'noisy' and 'noisy for me'. Unfortunately he becomes fanatic over this kind of thing and inflames others who just follow an argument without checking it out properly.
You know, there are plenty of people who don't like Coltrane. I'm surprised they're still alive!
It's all very childish, isn't it, and it's time we grew up.
-
I don't give a shit about that guy, I was just citing it as a public example of how people will go after someone for being harsh in their criticism of a largely respected player that's all
Originally Posted by djg
-
hahaha maybe because they know better and keep quiet? I was assaulted for admitting not to like Jackie McLean, luckily there's plenty of Coltrane that I like that defused the situation, or I would be dead.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
and that's when you were like "I better move to China"
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
-
These are sociological phenomena.
Originally Posted by joe2758
-
oh no, that actually took place in China haha, with a fellow laowai musician of course, Chinese folks are not aggressive like that.
Originally Posted by joe2758
-
Dude it was so dramatic haha
Originally Posted by djg
This was also long enough ago that this was before anyone could really anticipate a blow up like that. Guy says dumb thing on internet. Guy flabbergasted when it turns out the internet cares for some reason.
-
I think it's incredible that jazz, simply a particular kind of music, has become like politics and religion, religion especially. Say anything against their blessed leader or their blasted prophet and they will, literally, burn, torture and kill you. It's insane, but then the world's like that.
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
it's all about wanting to be a big shot. By defending actual big shots by inference you enter the same league. It's a sickness.
-
Who are these jazz fans burning and torturing and killing people? I don't think exaggerating for rhetorical effect is effective in proving your point, personally. What you mean is that people are passionate about music and these musicians, and feel inclined to defend them. That is not very insane at all.
Originally Posted by ragman1
I agree jazz can be like a religion, or music more broadly. I do like the mysticism and spirituality of particular sorts of jazz. This is a good thing. It just goes to show the depth of feeling and importance of this music. Listening to John Coltrane or certain records of Miles Davis can be like a religious experience. It is really that great.
I have no idea about how you came to this conclusion, which I think is totally false. I and many others do not feel passionate about this music because they want to be a big shot. You see, there is this thing where people love music and the musicians who make it, and feel inclined to defend it against people who do not understand it. The idea that I enter the same league of a great musician simply by loving their work and defending them is twee and risible. I think it's more a sickness what you are saying, which evinces total lack of understanding of what motivates music lovers.
Originally Posted by ragman1



Reply With Quote

“Shearing style”
Yesterday, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions