-
Re: Don't spurn the blues
That's fantastic advice.
-
03-23-2024 10:23 PM
-
I more agree with Ukena. Yes, there's the instinct for all musicians to be self critical and strive for continual improvement, but if you're not a foo with respect to realization, you should be able to be happy and even find continual happiness about achieving milestones. That's how it's been for me.
-
Practicing the guitar brings me joy.
I don’t really think about my playing
level. I am humble in public because people don’t like a braggart, but I’m no longer concerned with labels like, beginner, intermediate or advanced.
There’s guys that are better than me that can’t get a gig, and guys that are worse turning gigs down because they’re so busy.
I did play tonight and got another booking before I left. That brought me a lot of joy.
Edit: I guess my point is, I don’t see how you can enjoy mastery without gigging. And in line with that, you don’t need mastery to gig, you need persistence and desire. So, I don’t understand be good be happy. Thats too abstract for me. Good is a moving
goal that you never reach.
-
Well that's a good perspective to have, and you should enjoy music at whatever stage you're at, but that completely isn't true that good is a moving goal that you never reach. You think if you can play correctly, keep good time, play the head, outline the changes, do some tech stuff, phrase well, play an inspiring solo, not make clams etc, that hasn't achieved being good?
-
He’d played rock first I think
Originally Posted by RJVB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Internally, it’s not got enough. For example, last night we played Song For My Father and I tried mixing quartal comping into it. It went great and the trumpet player even complimented me. I was pleased, but I was already thinking about how I couldn’t do that on a major tune and needed to work on major quartals. So I’m not good, or at least, not as good as I want. It’s a moving goal.
Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith
If I saw someone else do it, I would certainly compliment them and think they were good. In my opinion, anyone who can solidly play through a song, even if it’s Sweet Home Chicago or Tennessee Whiskey, is a good musician.
-
Well that's your perspective on your level. Noone has command of every skill. However, there are players whose proficiency isn't deficient by their inward standards, or objectively outward by the quality of their music because they've achieved a baseline solid level of playing. Therefor good is not a movable goal.
-
I get what you’re saying here. It’s taken a long time but I’ve gotten pretty good at separating performing from practicing. You get better at playing, but you also get better at hearing and you know more … so as you get better, you also are able to hear in more detail and are able to hold yourself to a higher standard. So you’re past a certain point, I feel like you’re kind of always hearing mistakes or things to improve on, no matter how good you get.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
But I think it’s also really important to silo performance away from that mentality. Performing should be fun, and always being unsatisfied with performance is a good way to burn out and stop having fun.
-
This is basically what I'm trying to say.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Yeah and I have trouble with that so I do some little things. One is that I never record performances. Which is weird, admittedly. I really enjoy when other people record me and send me what they have, but the idea of recording myself for the purpose of listening back is a bummer.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
I don't know what quartals are, I thought that was something you fed into the jukebox. I used to do Song For My Father in E about 15-20 years ago with some dudes I was playing with at the time. Never was any good at anything past the melody line. Probably wasn't any good with the melody line. These days I do Senor Blues with the Taj Mahal lyrics and I suck at that one and have been wanting to ditch it but the band likes it cause they get showcased, drum solo, bass solo, and all. I get into major pentatonic stuff more than minor stuff. It makes me feel better inside.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
I can speak with authority that the estate of Horace Silver wants serious compensation through Harry Fox or whoever it was for putting his stuff for sale on wax. I think I paid about 70+ bucks for licensing 500 hard copies in 2014, which was a good deal more than some other songs I recorded around that time.
Sweet Home Chicago is one of the few common straight ahead I-IV-V standards I still do. When someone asks for Tennessee Whiskey (way too often) I tell them we's a blues band and we only drink Kentucky Bourbon but thanks for offering to buy us a drink anyways, lol
-
Quartal chords are minor chords that fit on the neck well and you can slide them around real easy just like a 9th.
They were in this comping book I worked through.
https://www.amazon.com/Easy-Jazz-Gui...1edcee83ab9907
-
Sideways shift: My understanding of licensing fees for recordings (via, say, Harry Fox) is that the compulsory license fee is not set by the composer/rights owner but is fixed according to number of units produced and length of play of the track. Horace Silver was an ASCAP artist, but perhaps it's not Harry Fox that administers his compositions. On the other hand, the statutory/compulsory license fee is currently just over $.09/song, as far as I can tell, independent of what agency is managing the account.
(I haven't had to deal with recordings, but I have had to wrangle PRO fees and rules as a member of our folk society's board.)
-
Yep I’ve gone off that
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
In a way the gig is beyond my control. It’s easy to fixate on the mistakes. But what is in my control is the practicing before hand, so I record that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
In general, no, 26 is not too young to get good enough to play jazz in bars. Lots of people have gotten that far with late starts (guilty as charged, your honor), and one does not need to be “great" for that. Pretty good and good at networking/hustling up gigs will suffice. The bandstands of the world are full of people who are nowhere near “great.”
Could the OP achieve that? Or go beyond that and actually become great? That’s up to his innate talent and work ethic, neither of which have been demonstrated on this thread so far. IOW, show us what you got. Maybe you’re already great, who knows?
-
Oh boy...
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
Joe Pass might disagree...
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
So if most people here say yes, too late, would you then put this crazy idea aside and focus on achievable goal like plumbing or accountant career?
Originally Posted by Zlobert98
-
Joe also played jazz with others. I was in my living room.
Originally Posted by Doug B
If all you play is by yourself (like I was) its like saying you're into BBQ but you've never done a brisket.
-
from the saxophone thread "Not sure I can respect a jazzer who can't also stick a 2 or 3 hour blues gig."
Originally Posted by DawgBone
does that work the other way around too?
-
I would not expect a blues guy to hang at a jazz gig. You're moving the barometer the wrong way.. Blues is the foundation of jazz.
Originally Posted by wintermoon
-
It goes both ways, I've heard jazzers try to play "authentic" blues, and it's not great.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
Now, if the blues guy can play "jazzy blues" and the jazzer can play "bluesy jazz", then all is well, you just meet in the middle.
-
oh ok, I didn't know that. so does that mean that jazz musicians are more rounded than blues guys since they should be able to play both styles? or since blues is the foundation of jazz does that mean that there really aren't two exclusive styles?
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Assuming you're being serious and not sarcastic.
Originally Posted by wintermoon
Being good at one thing doesn't mean you're inherently good at another. The blues is one form of many that jazz musicians should have a grasp on, that doesn't mean you have Freddie King licks for days of the feel of BB King, but you should be able to easily navigate a blues form and play passable solos over it.
A jazz guy being more well rounded than a blues guy is an amateur way of thinking. Things are more complex than that.
I would suggest you watch the Herb Ellis instructional video on youtube, I'm basically parroting what he says.
-
Okay, let's go back then. If you're parroting what Herb Ellis says, why would you be so authoritative about blues and jazz? Why wouldn't you say, "According to Herb Ellis..." instead of making definitive statements?
Originally Posted by AllanAllen



Reply With Quote

“Shearing style”
Today, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions