-
The progression in bars 13-14, | C/G | D7 F/G | is rarely played either with that last bar usually given over to a more conventional ii-V (Bm7b5 E7b9).
Originally Posted by Bop Head
-
01-05-2024 05:15 AM
-
I don't do that either. That D chord is definitely from the original, I think. Mine looks like
Am6/E7 - % - % - Am6/A7+
Dm/Dm/M7 - Dm7/Dm6 - E7/B7b5 - E7/E7+
Am6/E7 - % - % - %
CM7/Am7 - F7/E7 - Am6/E7 - Am6/E7+(#9)
We're off subject, I believe :-)
-
This one's got the notes. It's unedited and wasn't for public consumption. Just testing. Incidentally, note the first phrase: G G# A B C D E. Just for fun.
-
and you can do all of that and it will sound 100% less cool than Grant Green soloing diatonically.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
*beams*
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
so proud
-
Allan Holdsworth used the same 8 note scale, he called it some strange name.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
But, it could be called a Dorian add Nat 7, this D-E-F-G-A-B-C-C#
Here's a pic of Allan Holdsworth with the scale:
Last edited by GuyBoden; 01-05-2024 at 09:28 AM.
-
Yeah. I think a lot of people start with the hard stuff.
Originally Posted by princeplanet
The truth is in minor keys you can basically play diatonically and add the odd major 6th and major 7th and sound hip af.
What happens if you put a A natural minor over an E7 say? Well you get an E7b9#9b13 sound. Which is pretty altered actually. The only note missing here is the b5. You can hear that. It's in the melody of Segment for example. Or Night in Tunisia. But this note is very dark and isn't used all the time.
-
It seems a simpler system, because Chord Scale Theory has all the chord tones, arps etc in each scale for each chord, but when CST was taught in my time, CST had no chromatic embellishment, no chromatic enclosures, no chromatic approach notes, I thought that this was one of it's biggest problems. Maybe it's changed.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
Nowadays, I'm trying to learn and play all music by ear.
But, it's easy to let your fingers get faster than your ear.
-
A lot of people struggle when they first move to melodic minor based concepts for altered dominant and tonic minor chords in jazz. I certainly have. It's harder to create a variety of ideas in strict melodic minor that the ear can accept as easily as diatonic major based ideas.
It is tempting to treat the melodic minor scale as one is used to treating the major scale at first, but I think the melodic minor scale should be considered a looser scale. In fact it's called the ascending form in classical music. There are three minor scales that the minor key melodies and harmonies come from yet in jazz it's called the "jazz minor scale" which is misleading, I think.Last edited by Tal_175; 01-05-2024 at 08:17 AM.
-
I think when I’m playing any scale I’m usually not thinking much about the pure scale and thinking more about pulling shapes and things out of it. So there are lovely major triad ideas that sound altered as hell when they’re placed correctly and imply that orientation of the scale.
Originally Posted by Tal_175
So it might be easier to create sort of loosely consonant or logical melodies with a major scale, but that’s not really the goal anyway. I think creating actual interesting lines is the same process either way.
-
No, I wouldn't. Grant Green's useless.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Hehe. Out comes the troll.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
It's a joke, you twat.
By the way, I googled 'Jerry Bergonzi's Dorian Bebop Scale' and got nothing. He does bebop scale lessons etc but it's just the usual fare. Are you sure it exists?Jerry Bergonzi’s Dorian bebop scale..... I have heard of it and it is a thing.
-
It's in one of his "Inside Improvisation Series" books IIRC. Would have to go to the library to tell you which volume.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
Originally Posted by ragman1
Whew. Thank you so much for clarifying. I had no idea, though I’m sure you could tell based on the way I didn’t laugh and immediately launched into an earnest case for why Grant Green is better than some random message board poster.
Thats a load off.
Yerp.By the way, I googled 'Jerry Bergonzi's Dorian Bebop Scale' and got nothing. He does bebop scale lessons etc but it's just the usual fare. Are you sure it exists?
His formulation is a half step between root and seventh, when available. When it’s not, a half step between the fifth and sixth.
-
My Music Masterclass is where I got it. I got a few classes as a gift and forgot to discontinue it for …. um …. Several months.
Originally Posted by Bop Head
-
Anyhow, it's looking seriously like the old saga, you can invent any old scale-u-like and it's fine coz it's *JAZZ*.
Fine by me :-)
-
That's not 'his' formulation, that's the usual bebop thing. Anyway, I don't care because I don't think like that.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Well it is “his.”
Originally Posted by ragman1
Which of course doesn’t mean it can’t be lots of other people’s formulation too.
How very late-capitalist of you, Ragman.
And if the formulation is so obvious, it’s a bit weird to ask if I’m sure it even exists.
-
I wish you would go. Fast! Today!
Originally Posted by Bop Head
-
Naturally, that's me all over!
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Well i mean it’s cos chord scale theory is a theory of voicings not lines. If you follow it’s prescriptions for making nice chords, it works pretty well.
Originally Posted by GuyBoden
notes in a line can be part of a chord, but quite often they are not. Such as chromatic enclosures as you say.
You can systematise melodic minor modes simply as adding fancy notes or altering pitches in the prevailing tonality.
just add the E to a Dm7b5 and bosh, locrian #2*. Add a B to the C minor 6, bosh melodic minor.
Altered is harder because it’s the Weird Scale and does the resolving thing but I’d say Ab and Eb most commonly used fancy notes on G7 (they belong to Abm). Probably Bb too.
(Be sure to listen to how they sound which is easier with one note than a whole scale.)
*why is called that? The 2 is major with would be natural according to convention of every other chord symbol. If it was sharp it would be E#. Nonsense.
-
You could do worse than use Allan’s ten as a scale syllabus. They are the main ones in jazz, including the two most immediately useful Barry Harris scales. (Although I’ve never knowingly used melodic minor #4)
Originally Posted by GuyBoden
Transcribing Allan at the moment. He uses the Barry harris added note rules hehe (I don’t know if he had a system for this …). Lot of bebop in his playing. He also plays bIIIo7 in a turnaround. Look at this lovely thing. You even get a bit of major-6 dim. Quite fun to play as well.
Anyway, I digress.Last edited by Christian Miller; 01-05-2024 at 11:12 AM.
-
1. It is not worth it. You are not really interested. You just like to troll today.
Originally Posted by ragman1
2. Your Google is obviously different from mine. This took me 5 sec
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Yes, I call it a Locrian Nat 2 scale.
Originally Posted by GuyBoden
Maybe, the Natural sign doesn't work in typing font and is automatically converted to a #.
Quote from JazzGuitar.be site:
The Melodic Minor Scale And Its Modes
"Here’s a list of the 7 modes of the melodic minor scale:
Melodic minor scale (aka jazz minor scale)
Dorian b2 (aka Phrygian #6)
Lydian augmented
Lydian dominant (aka overtone scale)
Mixolydian b6
Aeolian b5 (aka Locrian #2)
Altered scale (aka super Locrian)"
So, for a laugh, to make things simple or more confusing, I've renamed the Melodic Minor modes based on Major mode names.
C-D-Eb-F-G-A-B
Ionian b3 is C-D-Eb-F-G-A-B-C
Dorian b2 is D-Eb-F-G-A-B-C
Phrygian b1 is Eb-F-G-A-B-C-D
Lydian b7 is F-G-A-B-C-D-Eb
Mixolydian b6 is G-A-B-C-D-Eb-F
Aeolian b5 is A-B-C-D-Eb-F-G
Locrian b4 is B-C-D-Eb-F-G-A
Is that better?




Reply With Quote


“Shearing style”
Today, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions