-
He probably meant he only completed two transcriptions in the literal sense (writing them down). I'll bet he analyzed a lot of solos without writing them down. He may have done less of this than his peers though. Jim Hall seemed very intent on pushing boundaries through his own imagination and experiments, rather than deriving ideas from the playing of others. (This is just a hunch.)
Originally Posted by atari4003
-
01-19-2015 03:20 PM
-
I agree, because Jim Hall's very early recordings sound like he's listened and learned a lot of Charlie Christian.
Originally Posted by KIRKP
-
My 2 cents... transcribing an entire solo, then going back, and learning every phrase in 12 keys and in 3 positions is slowly changing the way I hear and play. You can practice the same with comping and the melody as well. You almost don't need to do anything else.
-
I can never tell if you are just trolling or if you're actually as ignorant and clueless as you make yourself out to be. To be honest though, I don't think you are CONSTANTLY trolling, so?
Originally Posted by Richb
-
Great stuff
Originally Posted by tyjbeck

Here's a very, very informative step by step method of Transcribing by Dave Liebman:
David Liebman: Educational Articles
-
Gosh man ... I read that article a few years ago and forgot about it. That's a gold mine. There's so much "make it your own" and "it's all about vocabulary" and "the answers are in the recordings" sort of one-liners out there it's hard to pin someone down and have them really explain what they do, why they do it, and why they think you should do it too
Originally Posted by GuyBoden
-
I think Dave Liebman's transcribing technique is based on Tristano's method.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
Keep up the good work, I'm a believer too
-
OK, I have a problem with the word transcribe. It means different things to different people. I like 'learn solos by ear.'
True transcription - writing down solos won't necessarily teach you any music. It will improve your ear and hone your notation skills, no bad things of themselves. It also gets it on the page where you can analyse it using what ever flavour of theory floats your boat. Again, no bad thing per se.
However, working out how to play solos on your instrument is something else entirely, as is memorising a solo so that you can sing it or play it without accompaniment. That'll teach you all sort of different things.
People like Wolf Marshall, inadvertentley have caused more harm than good. The market exists because people want short cuts. TAB and 'hot licks.' So we have players unused to using their ears, or reading notation. The second is forgivable, but limits your options. The first is unacceptable in a serious musician. We've all been there :-)
But if you only transcribe a handful of licks and maybe one solo, and get the maximum value out of a small amount (perhaps by doing several of the things I mentioned), that's great. If you know all the Bird solos in all 12, that's also great. There are examples of world class musicians who have done both.Last edited by christianm77; 01-27-2015 at 08:29 PM.
-
Finally, revisiting old transcriptions and listening to the solos you worked on a few years back can present a stark idea of how your hearing and perception of music has progressed - really interesting, I think.



Reply With Quote

“Shearing style”
Today, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions