The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Posts 101 to 109 of 109
  1. #101
    djg
    djg is offline

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Strat-itis View Post
    But I must commend you for controlling your emotions enough to engage logically.
    i dont. i just do the same as you do. i copy and paste it into an llm. neither of us knows if the words make any sense. my advantage is that i can let the llm loose, while you constantly have to control it to keep up the pretense. my concern for you is genuine so good luck. this will not end well.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #102

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by djg View Post
    my concern for you is genuine so good luck. this will not end well.

  4. #103

    User Info Menu

    Yep, I used the wrong wording there. Model still holds tho.

  5. #104

    User Info Menu

    Don't worry, Christian was going to write to the Oxford Dictionary once to tell them their definitions were all wrong...

    Those were the days

  6. #105

    User Info Menu


  7. #106

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Strat-itis View Post
    No man, I would never expect validation from you or this forum. I just defend myself when people are absurd to me.

    Thanks for your honesty. I assumed some people would engage with the content I created on its level, but I guess I overestimated. That's kind of my fault for expecting positive discourse about it.

    You must be joking? I authored all the concepts. I used AI to draft the thing quickly for the purpose of stamping authorship. I knew it would be imperfect, but all my intended concepts are there, and I can manually improve things as I move foreward.

    You would have to actually engage with its logic to know that.. I'm not saying it's proven. I am saying for certain that it's quite coherent and viable. And it doesn't have the glaring contradictions that GR has.
    I’m still none the wiser as to why you want me to read it.

    I can’t give you a professional opinion, and even if I could you’d reject it.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #107

    User Info Menu

    You don't have to read or entertain it, but if you're going to invalidate it, an actual scientific rationale is required.
    Last edited by Strat-itis; Yesterday at 06:32 PM.

  9. #108

    User Info Menu

    Here's the summary if anyone cares or can absorb this modest amount of material.

    Loading Google Docs

    Geometric Unity-5d-clip-png

  10. #109

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Strat-itis View Post
    ...
    I am pretty sure that rotation in 5D is the same as universal 3D expansion.
    Universal in the sense of each particles' expansion (acceleration of radius).
    No gravity, no expansion of space - just size growth of individual particles.
    Equivalence principle yields an observed gravitation and space expansion.

    Strat-itis, have not looked at your paper, have to go perform; I'll look at it.