-
Ah that’s so interesting. I hadn’t really given that “lighting up” idea a ton of thought until I had a couple students who were coming over from other instruments (two horn players and a singer) who kept telling me they didn’t understand some triads we were working on it. I’d explain it and they’d say “I know” and I’d explain the fingering and they’d say “I know.” And I’d be like … “well it sounds like you get it.”
Originally Posted by Tal_175
And all three would respond that it was just frustrating that they didn’t know what all the notes were when they played a chord. And I had to think about it for a second, but basically they felt like they were cheating or taking a shortcut because they were finding a chord by the shape. And I had to explain to them that that’s just kind of how guitar works. It’s such a handily visual-tactile instrument that it would be a little odd to try *not* to identify notes and chord tones and intervals in that sort of visual way.
Super interesting.
-
06-29-2023 12:53 PM
-
For a while I was trying to do both. I know the notes on the fretboard and I can fairly quickly tell the notes in any chord, in any key. So it seemed to me like I had to maintain both views of the fretboard with equal emphasis at least in the practice room. But that was a huge overhead. A major breakthrough happened in my development when I realized that I only needed to focus on the intervallic/visual relationships. The note names are still useful of course but in a secondary capacity.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
I also think there is a big pedagogical difference between learning the fretboard by shapes versus intervals as primary visual references. For example I find juggling triad inversion shapes and applying transformations to them (aka Pat Martino) very gimmicky. It's a method that accepts a low ceiling from the get go. At least that was my experience. (I'm not saying Pat Martino has had a low ceiling BTW, I'm fairly certain that his fretboard horizon stretched way further than his simple teaching tools).
There is nothing wrong with seeing inversions as a set of horizontally laid out shapes if one doesn't sacrifice intervallic relationships of individual voices with the chord. Otherwise it just becomes a shortcut, IMO.
Of course everybody learns differently but there is a difference between shapes vs intervals as primary references. We all learn the shapes automatically by repetition. Intervals take deliberate effort to learn but they open the door to a higher resolution understanding of the fretboard.Last edited by Tal_175; 06-29-2023 at 01:42 PM.



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos