-
Your post still has improper syntax.
Originally Posted by joe2758
-
05-12-2026 10:52 AM
-
Well ...
Originally Posted by Strat-itis
-
Yup. Like you have a strict adherence to didactic truth in all instances. Get Christian in here and you'll be supporting alt facts all day. I'm dead certain my point wasn't to falsely identify backdoor dominants, nor is it the point of the thread to be able to correctly identify dominants that resolve a whole step up. That's a tough one.
-
You’re just catching light grief for posting something that turned out to be wrong. It’s all good.
Originally Posted by Strat-itis
But I understand … this is very serious business.
On the real, I’ll lay off though.
-
-
I saw what you did!
Originally Posted by Strat-itis
-
-
It's funny the way the records are full of alt facts.
We should tidy up jazz to get rid of things that disagree with jazz teachers. Who's with me?
-
** Christian sits a desk, late at night. A single desk lamp lights the room. He hunches over an Omni Book, meticulously whiting out all the 4s over dominant chords.**
”This will make things right,” he whispers to himself, over and over. “Yes, this is better.”
-
He's on his way to being a national treasure!
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Yea... it's all good. I mean playing any tune over and over the same way etc... gets old. But that's work.
There are always many harmonically organized chord patterns for approaching Tonal targets. That's kind of what it is to play in a jazz style. The better one organizes "rhythmically", how one expands "harmonically", basic changes with functional movement... well the better the result can become.
There's nothing wrong with just playing the basic changes... but, I worked with a different rhythm section last night,
just guitar trio, tpt. sax and vln... audiences always seem to appreciate tunes more when we expand... standards both rhythmically as well as harmonically. Soloist almost always do ...LOL
Different gigs... different performance approaches.
-
I regret to say that I am acronym-deficient. What is a "BD"?
Originally Posted by garybaldy
-
Back door
Originally Posted by dconeill
-
I'm guessing your having fun... but just in case...
Originally Posted by dconeill
Backdoor Dominants are from using.... bVII7 from the parallel Minor Key (Functional concept).
Relative Min. of Cmaj is the VI-chord, A-7. Cma D- E- Fma G7 ( A-7 ) B-7b5 Cmaj.
Ima II- III- IVma V7 ( VI-) VII-7b5 Ima
Same Key Sig. starting on the Rel.Mi. VI- chord A-7 B-7b5 Cma D- E- Fma G7
Parallel Min. of Cmaj. is Cmin. which becomes . I-7 II-7b5 bIIIma VI- V- bVIma bVII7
Same chords, just starting on the VI- chord or
the New I chord from using Parallel Minor
So the nick name has become..."Backdoor" V7 chord
The IV- chord is also "borrowed" from the Parallel Min. Key. And because we as Jazz Players use Chord Patterns all the time using similar functional concepts, (or just because we like the sound), The II- V7 two chord Chord Pattern (CP) is very standard and we use the II-7 and related V7 interchangeable... like subs etc...
Long story of how we as jazz players use Backdoor VII7 chords and where it comes from Functionally.
When you expand the Relative and Parallel concepts with Modal Interchange, (MI), you'll begin to see and hear other possible ... organization of chords.
-
Nope, was once voted the World's Dullest Man, apparently fun is a foreign concept to me.
Originally Posted by Reg
Thanks for the clear explanation. I now understand BD to some degree. At least in this context.
-
FWIW with Barry Harris we basically converted all IVm chords to bVII in the early stages.
He told us not to worry about the #11, but obviously that note is present in many standards where this type of chord appears. To basic byatch examples being Days of wine and Roses and Cherokee.
This note is of course the same as the major seventh on IVm, being ‘the melodic minor’ note. (It’s just one note, right?)
Sure enough if you sit down with Parker’s Ko Ko (Cherokee changes) you’ll notice every time he plays Db on the Ab7 chord. Not that Bird never play #11 on dominant - but it’s interesting how the Bebop guys tended to cut and paste the same dominant material onto every dominant. (Although Barry was more diatonic as the baseline.) You see it in relative minor too! A13 going to Dm in the key of F, for example.
These days there seems more of a tendency to relate scale choice to the melody. So we play #11 on that chord. That’s what someone like Jonathan Kreisberg would say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
I wouldn't know. Replaced by whom?It seems that every iv (to tonic) is replaced by a BD dom these days.
-
-
-
-
Cliff, we used to spend quite a bit of time in lessons running the Bb7 scale down to the third of G7 and resolving to C, right?
It's the same thing.
But yes, the origin of the altered dominant is the parallel minor. The V7b9b13 chord is naturally found in the harmonic minor scale. So if you interchange major for minor, that what you have.
When you run down the borrowed Bb7 scale, you are actually playing C minor. When you go the third of G7 - B, you raise the 7th by a half step and that gives you C harmonic minor.
Backdoor = natural minor anyway.
-
-
"I am the IVm man" doesn't quite have the same effect.....
-
Doot, doot, doo, lookin' out my iv I.



Reply With Quote

. But I suspect I'm slower on the uptake than you give me credit for.

Jack.Wilkins birthday tribute- "My Foolish Heart" by Jeff...
Yesterday, 11:17 PM in The Players