I'm not saying we don't need
any names, and I fully agree that, in both speech and writing, we need words to discuss and learn about music. We have to call the sounds
something... and we need agreed and consistent terminology in order to do that sensibly.
My beef is with terms that lead off down unnecessarily complicated paths. I think a lot of experienced musicians - as well as those (like myself!) who actually enjoy theory for its own sake - quite like all the potential ramifications thrown up by apparently simple musical entities. Theoretical concepts can spread like weeds... before long we have a jungle.
When it comes to concepts like "modes", then we need to get out the machete...

They clarify to some extent, in that they delineate groups of notes, simple structures. They produce the
appearance of clarity, a sensation of understanding.
But as soon as you listen to blues you find the boundaries blurred. Not only do blues players move around between one scale and the other, they move around (bending, sliding etc) between the scale(s) and the chord tones.
No original blues artist learned by learning scales; they learned by copying licks and chord shapes.
Of course the licks
imply certain scales; it's not hard to analyse blues and reduce the commonest note choices to a minor pentatonic scale. But that's the point that's often forgotten: it's a
reductive process, because our intellect naturally wants to simplify - to spot patterns - in order to understand.
It's why beginners often face an uphill struggle: they learn the minor pent patterns, and then wonder why their soloing sounds dull and generic - they get "stuck in a rut"; they have to
work their way back up to the licks and riffs (and bends and chord tone references etc) of
actual blues. But if they started from the beginning trying to copy the licks in actual blues recordings, they wouldn't have that problem. (They'd still need to develop
technique, of course, and plenty of listening experience; but we all need that anyway.)
Me neither.
But neither did it do any good, other than giving me a nice comfortable sense that I
understood something. The bebop scale concept makes perfect sense. When I read about it I thought "oh yeah, of course!" I hadn't transcribed any bebop solos at all at that point, but I trusted the writers that the concept explained much of them. (I also trusted Mark Levine's Jazz Theory Book because he was a good writer and had obviously listened to way more jazz than I'd have time for in the rest of my life.)
But when I actually look at (and listen to) bebop solos, I don't see much evidence of bebop scales.
(The more I looked at Levine's transcribed solo phrases, the more I saw other ways of interpreting them than his. As evidence for any one theory they were far from conclusive.)
I don't regard reducing bebop solos to scale choices to be a very useful process. What I see in that kind of improvisation (and again this may just be about my own chosen perspective) is arpeggios and chromatic approaches. Yes, on one level, there are diatonic-scales-with-chromatic-passing-notes being used - but I'm looking at context all the time (the next level up) and seeing how a particular scale run or chromatic choice aligns with the chord(s) of the moment. That's how it makes sense - that seems (to me) to be the clear thought process the player is employing. Not "I'm going to play bebop dominant here" but "I'm going to play around/through this arpeggio and enclose a chord tone here".
I do think a foundational knowledge of major and minor scales is fundamental - I'm not saying one can understand chords or keys without it. But it's the study of key theory (tonality, chord structure and function) - which all the bebop players knew well - that's the solution to being able to solo in that music. The scales are only the start.
And one can actually approach scales
via chords. One can learn arpeggios of G, C and D triads, and one is automatically playing the "G major scale" in a meaningful way; more useful (and musical) than just playing G-A-B-C-D-E-F#-G up and down. It's a small step from there to the idea of chromatic approach: preceding chord tones with half-steps below. And then you're sounding "jazzy" right away.
“Shearing style”
Today, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions