-
06-28-2009, 02:53 PM #26Jazzarian GuestYour analogy would have been good if it had not included Scofield. You might as well add Mark Tremonti if you're going to include him.
Originally Posted by PSUnderwood
-
06-28-2009 02:53 PM
-
It wasn't an analogy, but OK: Mark Tremonti is the best Mark Tremonti there is. Angus Young is the best Angus Young there is. Slash is the best Slash there is. None of this says "X is the greatest guitarist there is" or "Y is the greatest <insert genre here> guitarist there is". My point is that each guitarist plays whatever he plays as well as he can play it (bit of an assumption there, perhaps), regardless of anyone else's taste. Shredders are great at playing dorian scales/minor pentatonics in sixteenths at 450 bpm, and they'll do it whether I like it or not, whether I consider it musical or not. By and large, calling anyone "the greatest <insert skill here>" is equivalent to saying "X is the <insert skill here> I like best", and that's something I can't argue with. It says nothing about technical mastery, expressiveness, or anything else but the emotional response of one individual to another. Some consider Segovia a great guitarist. He couldn't have been great, he couldn't cover Eddie Van Halen's 'Eruption'. Eddie Van Halen could never be great; he can't blow over Coltrane changes. Sure, Wes Montgomery could play jazz, but could he stand up to Joe Satriani? Jazz guys will answer one way, rock guys another. Comparing players within a genre is just the same, within a smaller pool. Django Reinhardt was no Ben Monder, or vice-versa.
Love the music you love. Share it with others. For what it's worth, I like a lot of what I've heard from a lot of different guitarists, and I like them for different reasons at different times. "Greatest" doesn't enter into it for me. Except for my own playing, where "greatness" is an ideal I'll never achieve.
-
06-28-2009, 04:11 PM #28Jazzarian Guest
" Sure, Wes Montgomery could play jazz, but could he stand up to Joe Satriani?"
Wes Montgomery would have made him look like an idiot.
Sorry but tapping fools like Vai and Satriani aren't in the same league with jazz guitarists.
-
What a shame Miles didn't tell George that HE played too many notes. We wouldn't have had to endure the travesty of that horrendous video of the opening post. Though I only watched half of it, at first thinking I could only waste 4 minutes of my life instead of eight, but I decided to shut it down at the point where I thought GB was going to flip the guitar over and start playing with his teeth.
Originally Posted by Jazzarian
Sorry jazzarian, but this "music" is closer to Jimi than Wes and it is NOT jazz but just six string masturbation. A great song like Take Five deserves better than a shabby ersatz Hendrix treatment like this.
Oh dear... I've done it now ...
-
Originally Posted by Sordello
Now, I DO hope you are just being tongue-in-cheek here. It is NOT jazz? Masturbation? Sounds more like Jimi Hendrix? Take your meds and call it a day, already. I don't agree with everything Jazzarian says, but.......
-
"Sorry, don't think Johnny Smith quite had all of Benson's chops, as seen in the video."
When it comes to chops, Johnny Smith wrote the book - there are few who can match the speed and cleanliness of Smith's technique, and GB is not one of them.
-
06-29-2009, 12:41 PM #32Jazzarian Guest
Originally Posted by Krish
That is comical and worth revisiting. I guess one's own voice can be replaced with a Flanger.
-
Well, yes, the tongue was firmly planted; after that video, I just had to engage in a little 'poking-of-the-bear'. I actually do like a lot of George Benson's work, although I prefer the early GB than the later.
Originally Posted by franco6719
Having said that though, I DID turn the video off after 4 minutes and I DID think it was an atrocious performance of a great jazz tune. Sorry all, but speed-of-light scale improvisations (aka "jazz shredding") just doesn't turn my crank.
-
Well I watched the Take 5 video, all the way to the end, and I liked it.
Originally Posted by Jazzarian
But y'know, each to their own.
-
don't understand the Benson bashing relating to the video, "too many notes" - "too flashy" - "masturbation" - .... oh well, I suppose people said that about Tatum, Bird and Trane. Surely there's bad "flashy" and good "flashy"?
Benson just has to be seen as the latter. Sure he has "lines", but so does Herbie Hancock. Anyway, this is a Jazz forum, arguing who's the best whatever, that belongs on Metal forums with excitable (and impressionable) adolescents ....
-
06-30-2009, 12:40 PM #36Jazzarian GuestWhen it comes to jazz greats, there isn't a "best". You'd think most would know that. Tatum "better" than Tyner?
Originally Posted by princeplanet
Brownie better than Hubbard? (both would kick Miles' ass btw).
Of course, the concept of being a "great" is open for debate. I certainly wouldn't associate the term with John Scofield, but that's just me
Russell Malone, Pat Metheny, Jimmy Bruno, Paul Bollenback etc etc are just allowed to say George Benson is the best, presently (Wes being the all time fav). Most mortals can't say such a thing



Reply With Quote

Has anyone tried the JHS Clover preamp pedal?
Today, 05:41 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos