-
What are you singing?
Originally Posted by pauln
-
08-24-2023 05:57 PM
-
Simple explanation
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
"How it goes" means I know what it sounds like enough to play it.
Explanation of what and how
I think that my musical mind's inner ear sings the aural perception
isomorphic up to the phenomenological qualia of hearing the tune.Last edited by pauln; 08-24-2023 at 10:00 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
It is all about theory in art schools these days. You would love it.
Imitating is frowned upon. Instead, the student must develop her 'practice'. Students would like to learn to draw but, in my experience, art schools will not have that.
If you study illustration, you really should not copy others — that is the way to the law courts.
-
It’s only that if you publish try to claim other’s work as your own, obviously
Originally Posted by Litterick
anyway, I think your post basically confirms what I said.
-
I'm intrigued by the issue of originality vs focus on others' material.
After spending decades trying to learn to play others' music, I realized that in the time I had left, I might instead try to develop my own voice.
I'm a bad witness on any of this, but, after listening to old recordings and new, I think it might be that I had a voice long before I thought of it that way. I think I dismissed it because it didn't sound that good to me. With a couple decades of work, I think I've developed that voice a little further, but it's the same basic voice.
So, now I tell myself "this is the way I hear the music".
I still find it lacking, to the point where I finally decided to follow the advice to transcribe (lift, really) a little bit every day.
To sum up, with a lot of work I became slightly better at the same old thing. And, probably, that's because I didn't change my ears much. I hear things a certain way. If I want to sound different I have to think of the math and the solos get worse.
-
It’s aggravating to see the false dichotomy between learning from others and being ‘original’ raising its head again. There is no dichotomy.
There are only people who feel guilty for not transcribing more haha. Tbh the guilt is a low background level hum for most of us, but it can be hard to find the time.
Which is sad because I always get so much from it. I think it even makes me a better person. Slightly.
-
We all are. That’s one reason it’s best not to think about it.
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
I remember Sco saying ‘when I listen back to my playing I can’t tell if it’s any good or not’.
There can also be a tendency to think originality expresses itself in pitch choices (classical score based mindset), where it seems to me that much or most of it is expressed in the way the notes are played. (David made that point.)
Instead I think the productive path is to engage with the music that appeals to you and with the process of making music. Work on your skills as the need arises.
I presume we are in this because we like music?Last edited by Christian Miller; 08-25-2023 at 04:04 AM.
-
welcome to the dark side.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
I’ve never had the time to do owt else. Except for 2021, nothing better to do then haha
Originally Posted by djg
-
I don't know if its important or not but when I transcribe a solo I like I find myself very absorbed to what I am doing and time just seemed to fly by pretty fast. More than any other exercises I've done so far
-
What you said was uninformed conjecture. But you are secure in your ignorance, so I will not interfere.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
I was quite shocked by the lack of technical skill at my local art school, and the decline of visual ability among students during this century.
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
The vibe on this thread is suddenly quite defensive. I must say—I’m rather taken aback.
-
This is lovely and very nicely put.
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
I tell students a lot of the time that a voice is kind of that simple —everyone chooses to listen to a different assortment of music; of that music, everyone will choose to learn and copy different stuff; and of that stuff, everyone will think about what’s going on in their own way.
The voice part is just kind of incidental.
Obviously is much easier to tell students that than it is to think that way about my own playing. We’re always more inclined to put much more pressure on ourselves, I guess.
-
I see a lot of younger artists choosing to attend ateliers and participate in online courses focused on building real skills. This came about in part because of the fairly robust animation and comic book industries.
Originally Posted by Litterick
I think I understand why Wayne Thiebaud liked to say he was a painter, and not an artist.
-
Unfortunately this is maybe the reverse for jazz. There’s definitely some good stuff online, but a lot of it is sort of context-less. Ninety-seven easy ways to spice up your ii-Vs or whatever. There are a lot of flaws in the university jazz thing (a LOT) but there’s something to be said for learning music in a group of other similarly situated people, and being forced to take ear-training and theory, for example.
Originally Posted by Kirk Garrett
Again—a lot of flaws, a lot of variation from program to program and teacher to teacher, certainly some dependence on the music scene around the school. And of course money.
But the internet is a weird place for learning jazz. Just ask all the guys on YouTube who tell us two fingerings for a major scale are two different modes.
-
Though university or no, the best players are invariably still the ones who come through some sort of apprenticeship.
The church is still a huge influence. Folks who study somewhere like New York or Boston where there is a robust scene to supplement the educational stuff. Folks who grow up in it for whatever reason and educate themselves where education is to be had.
-
Reminds me of the joke of the piano player on the Titanic...
Originally Posted by pauln
"HEY! Don't you know the ship is sinking and we're all going to die!?
"Hmmmm...maybe...hum a few bars for me."
-
Which I guess was the inspiration for this British tea advert
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
I fail to see how anything you said contradicts anything I said. Identify the nature of the contradiction and maybe I’d understand why you are such a cross patch. Or maybe not.
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Of course you cannot see any contradiction with your opinion. That is your manner. I tried to help answer your questions. I have two degrees in art history and a PhD in architecture. I spent years in a university faculty that contains an art school (and a music school). I know artists. I thought I might make a useful contribution to the discussion by contrasting how music and art are taught. But I forgot that your reckons are more valuable than anyone's knowledge and experience. My bad. Sad face.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
are there any architecture boards we could stink up?
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Just for reference, I’d like to cite back to another really helpful thread on this forum:
Sense of humor.Coolness.
-
For what it’s worth, it seems to me that Christian is expressing some regret that imitation isn’t more encouraged as a way to learn. And that folks seem more inclined to chase originality at the expense of really studying by way of imitation.
Originally Posted by Litterick
I’m just a rube with no PhD, but that actually sounds an awful lot like what you’re saying too. That you regret how art schools seem way more caught up in theory and working in weird media than in imitating the masters. You mention how it seems like students of this generation seem not to be able to see the way earlier generations could. Anyway … I could be wrong, but actually it sounds like y’all are kind of saying the same thing.
-
That is exactly how I read them, too.



Reply With Quote

Speaker choice for old jazz?
Today, 12:46 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos