-
I've seen you play them.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Last edited by Tal_175; 02-14-2025 at 10:05 AM.
-
02-14-2025 09:00 AM
-
In fact, IIRC, parallel fifths and fourths were among the earliest examples of polyphony in medieval music.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
also, a minor 7th chord is two power chords a minor third apart.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
I'm not going to say which metal band I got this from, but it's something I think sounds interesting harmonically. Going between two power chords a tritone apart, with one of the power chords being, erm, inverted. So...
5 7 xxxx
6 6 xxxx
5 7 xxxx
6 6 xxxx
A5 and Eb5 power chords. The riff I got it from rapidly goes back and forth between the two.
-
My 2 cents on power chords...
I think a lot of the "power" in a power chord comes from the ambiguity of whether it is major or minor. The lack of a 3rd allows the singer to fluctuate between major, minor, or blues third. The power chord also produces a more open sound that doesn't make you feel like it needs to resolve (to me at least). It also solves a problem with the distortion used in rock-styled music. The high-volume distortion or the distortion from a pedal accentuates some of the partials in the harmonic series such as a major 3rd that isn't exactly the same one used in tempered tuning. Thus, if you play a plain old major chord it sounds bad as the two different major thirds fight each other (in a bad way to my ears).
George Benson frequently plays power chords, but at an octave above the rock players. He modified Wes's octave style to include a fifth or fourth. It added a bit more power or sizzle to the octave in Jazz.
I believe the earliest power chords user in Rock music was Pete Townsend of the Who, probably in the late 60's or early 70's. I think it was a necessity when using Marshal stacks.
-
wow I tried this and it tripped our fusebox and all the lights went out.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Sounds to me like you should stick to jazz then the rock guys won't bother you.
Originally Posted by PatrickJazzGuitar
-
Indeed. The avoidance of parallel fifths starts to become more of a feature of music in the late 15th century iirc.
Originally Posted by James W
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I’m not proud of that fact.
Originally Posted by Tal_175
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Darn, missed out the space haha. I’m not liable.
Originally Posted by grahambop
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
George Benson played octaves all the time with a fourth or fifth in between although he played them mostly on the upper strings.Guess he invented the power octave.
-
Thats the Shearing octave!
Originally Posted by nyc chaz
-
Don't remember Shearing hammering on between the fourth and fifth like Benson does but i could be wrong.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Well he did play a piano — lift up the lid on that thing and it’s all hammers under there, amirite?
Originally Posted by nyc chaz
-
Not really,i'm talking about Benson within the octave hammering back and forth at times between the fourth and fifth.I'm not an expert on Shearing but i don't remember hearing him do that.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Ahhh never mind. My humor must be too sophisticated.
-
Back to the OP, one might say that while all power chords are diads (or double stops), not all diads (or double stops) are power chords. So, saying "diad" or double stop isn't enough.
-
In contemporary post-tonal music theory, the term "trichord" is used to denote a 3-note simultaneity.
Originally Posted by Mick-7
-
"Every time I hear someone call a "power chord" a chord, I die a little inside."
I ask regarding the sound of three pitches rather than two, what property (other than definition of number of pitches) of "chord" makes the difference that it should be called a proper chord?
If you say "harmony", I ask the same question of that; what property (other than number of pitches) of "harmony" makes the difference that it should be called a proper harmony?
If you say two pitches are required for harmony, then I ask why are not two pitches' harmony sufficient for being called a chord if the required distinguishing property of a chord is harmony?
If you say two pitches are required to distinguish major from minor harmony, I will play you some three or more pitch chords that do no such thing. Then I will play some pairs of pitches that do so. Then I will ask you to play the bass line of a tune and accompany you playing just single pitches which clearly indicate not just major or minor, but numerous chord types, extensions and alterations, augmented, diminished, etc.
If I sound only one pitch as you play something on the bass so that it is clear the resulting harmony is major, but at that point in the tune the harmony is supposed to be minor, will you tell me I'm sounding the wrong chord, or sounding the wrong chord tone? If the right or wrong chord is happening if I am only providing my singular participation of one pitch (and you, as well), with just two pitches, where is the chord coming from? Can a horn section or an orchestra of single note instruments plays a chord? Who is playing that chord?
This whole denominational thing about how many pitches makes a chord is similar to the fundamental theorem of arithmetic in which the modern definition of prime numbers excludes 1 as prime in order that every integer larger than 1 can be written as a unique product of one or more primes. This is done by saying a positive integer is prime if its only factors are 1 and itself (except the number 1 in which case "1" and "itself" are the same number); 1 must not be allowed to be prime in order to avoid spoiling the unique prime factorization of integers greater than 1. 1^N where N could be any positive integer would allow factorization to include indefinitely long series of 1x1... which would fundamentally blow up the definition of prime numbers. Defining 1 as not prime is critical to defending the existence of a lot of other mathematical objects and structures that would fall away if 1 were prime.
But I'm not seeing how musical things are broken or blown up if chords are defined as less than three pitches... ?
-
-
Here's how I understand it.
Originally Posted by pauln
Who is playing a chord in an ensemble of single-note instruments? The ensemble is. No one instrument is playing a chord, but taken together they are.
The word "chord" has a stable definition of long standing - three or more pitches sounded at once. You can call a chair a "fimber", if you want to, but no one will know what you're talking about. So at bottom it's about communication - if you want your communicant to understand what you mean, you would do well to stick to the standard definitions of words.
Aside: calling a "power chord" a chord, as it contains only two pitches, is formally incorrect. But "power chord" is what almost everybody calls it, so that's the term we're stuck with to foster communication.
Two notes played at once can indeed indicate the harmony, to a certain extent - this is known as using "guide tones". The third and the seventh of a chord, within limits, determine the kind of chord it is. If what's being played doesn't include one or both the third or the seventh, then the chord is difficult to characterize in isolation. The third and the seventh, in any vertical order, can define the following harmonies:
[root implicit]
major third and major seventh relative to implicit root, e.g. [C] E B = major harmony; ambiguously, augmented harmony
major third and minor seventh, e.g. [C] E Bb = dominant harmony
minor third and minor seventh, e.g. [C] Eb Bb = minor harmony, ambiguously, half-diminished harmony
minor third and diminished seventh, e.g. [C] Eb Bbb or less formally [C] Eb A = diminished harmony
Some chord characteristics, such as sus4 and sus2 chords, don't fit well with third-seventh guide tones.
-
Now there's a first world problem.
-
Yeah, but it is way down the list;
Originally Posted by Scorch
the top is, "Where can I park my
car and how can I lose weight?"
-
I was this many years old when I discovered that a "power chord" was only 2 notes.
I've been playing Smoke on the Water wrong all these many years.
-
It's ok Dr Jeff, one needs to be willing to change.
-
fwiw, I've always thought of a "power chord" as three notes...albeit two of them are the same pitch class, one octave apart. The fifth happily nestled in between that octave.
Originally Posted by Doctor Jeff
And I will readily admit that I too played "Smoke On The Water" incorrectly for decades: Turns out Ritchie Blackmore did only use two-note "chords" ...but it was the inversion of the two notes I thought it was.



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos