-
Not at all; a good strategy for comping is to "do the opposite" of what the soloist is doing in regard to harmonic complexity. If the soloist is harmonically advanced you play simple chords and give the soloist full freedom.
Originally Posted by jamiehenderson1993
The real need for more advanced comping harmonies is to support a soloist that is playing simple solo lines (pentatonic blues lines). - to help their solo sound more harmonically complex.
You need to learn about two dozen chord types voiced for jazz/blues to do that well, so work at home doing that and employ them a little at a time on the band stand until you learn how and when they sound best and most assist the soloists (knowing how to use these chord type voicings will also provide pathways to developing your own soloing ideas).
-
10-30-2024 05:21 AM
-
I've had to sight read a bass part in the absence of a guitar part. I don't find it particularly easy especially if your not at all familiar with the song. My 50 years of bass playing doesn't seem to help!
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Originally Posted by garybaldy
Yeah, I didn't read the bass chart in time at rehearsal. I worked out the chords at home.
-
Honestly not sure I agree with this.
Originally Posted by pauln
I would say this about rhythmic complexity. Harmonic complexity, simple tends to be better regardless. Sometimes following the soloist on dissonance works better than other times, but I’m not sure I’m being super harmonically complex when someone is playing simple single lines.
-
Tried to expand this to major and minor.
Originally Posted by brent.h
-
Not bad … notice that the minor you did is the same as the major. When you do m7, it’s the same as maj6, just thinking of different notes as the root.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
In your Dm one, lower every C to a B and that’ll be the min6 diminished.
-
So, a little confused about the application. I’m not swapping my ii V I into ii6 V I… right? My gut says Imaj7 and I6 chords are more interchangeable, but m7 to m6 needs more care.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
IV6 - V7 - I6
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
or
IV6 - ii-6 - I6
(or a lot of other options on the dominant)
-
I haven't read the thread so apologies if this is not helpful but ii6 is literally the upper extensions of V7. That is, playing Dm7 to Dm6 is the same as playing Dm7 to G7, with the G root omitted.
Dm7 = D F A C
Dm6= D F A B
G7=G B D F A ; omit the root and you have the notes in Dm6
To clarify what I think Peter was saying about ma6 = mi7 think of the following example:
Am7 = A C E G
C6 = C E G A
Both contain the same notes - the chord symbol you would use to identify this depends on context/function; i.e. what the listener hears or what would be easiest for the person reading your chart to understand.
-
The best part of Alan’s book is the ten or so pages of these just one right after the other …
F6 - Bo - C6
F6 - Dm6 - C6
F6 - Abm6 - C6
etc
-
I don’t understand the book. I mean, I can play the stuff, but I didn’t understand what to do with it.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
I really learn best if someone in real life can say “do it like this” and then I copy them. It’s hard for me to get that out of a book.
-
Pick an F6 voicing, voicelead to the nearest D-6, voicelead to the nearest C6.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
Then pick a simple two-attack rhythm … maybe 1 (2) (3) + (4) … put the voicings on beat one and then put the diminished above the next chord on the and of three. Do the same thing with the diminished below. Mix them up.
Go to the next F6, find the other two that voicelead, do the same … next F6, etc.
Find another two-attack rhythm, do the same. Etc.
-
oh duh
Originally Posted by starjasmine
5x4555 is D9 and Am6.
THANKS!
-
Yeah there can be a barrier to entry with the systems and whatnot, but the genius is the simplicity once you’re there. Like every chord in the book comes down to maj6 and min6 … which is very cool.
-
IMO, every guitar instructional book should come with accompanying audio/video tracks that demonstrate the exercises, so you're not left guessing as to how to apply the material.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Yeah I get that. Personally I really like books that don’t waste a lot of time examples and etudes and stuff, but that’s a pure learning style thing, I think.
Ive gotten a lot out of certain books like that, but the ones that have stayed on the music stand (rather than the shelf) are the ones that I treat more like references … Alan’s book, Advancing Guitarist, Serious Jazz Practice Book, maybe a couple others
-
I just need one example to play around with.
-
Man, just play "chunk chunk."
"Chunk chunka" "chunka chunka" is the problem. Slop.
-
Oh dude… OP is long gone by now.
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
This book is really good:
https://www.amazon.com/MBGU-Jazz-Cur...s%2C154&sr=8-1
-
Of course, just having fun.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Peter is this Bm7b5 right? Specifically the overlap in the first and last voicing? It’s just root movement between those two.
-
Youve got them right. Just look carefully. It’s not just root movement.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
the last one is G E Bb and the first is A F B
-
Oh, thanks. I was grabbing it wrong. This guitar stuff is hard.
I was grabbing G E Bb and Ab E Bb. It’s tricky at the 15th fret. My markers stop.
Practicing big band charts tonight and I feel an improvement. I know what’s happening so it’s not as overwhelming
-
Thanks for all the helpful info - I love that many of the posts take on a life of their own. Apologies for not commenting sooner - life and all that. There's a wealth of info here - thank you so much to everyone who commented with such useful content. I appreciate everyone's time in helping me out with understanding these concepts. It's massively appreciated.



Reply With Quote

JJ music sales Ontario canada
Today, 04:01 PM in For Sale