-
Oh yeah all those classic etude guys do that — Sor, Giuliani, Carulli. Probably Carcassi too but never played much of him.
Ive taught this one before.
https://www.classicalguitarshed.com/...k5OS4wLjAuMA..
-
05-01-2024 07:14 AM
-
Perhaps Barney can be of help?
-
Yea... so this is how you start. Your playing Diatonic 3rds in Dmaj. Scale, (Ionian).
Originally Posted by lydian_dorian
Just for info. Your 1st finger defines what position your in. Playing 3rds as you described above generally requires changing positions.... which is again how you start.
Next... play the same pattern of 3rds... but using different scale.... Dmin. Dorian, then another scale etc...
Obviously you need to KNOW your scales. And these are technical exercises.
As far as playing tunes or "notes" that you don't understand what they are or how they function in a tune.
That is more complicated and requires understanding how to make an analysis of a tune. The analysis is just how you decide how the Melody and the Chords are working together within the "Tune".
You can just do this by ear or trial and error approaches...but it takes years to get your library of Plug and Play collection of Analysis of Tunes together. And generally most never get it together.
As compared to learning the theory of Analysis, which takes a year or two. Notes you might be thinking or hearing as chromatic etc... generally are just part of the harmony reflected by the Tune and Style your playing that Tune in.
Using chromatic approach is generally more of a Vanilla harmonic approach, a choice but more of an effect.
It takes time.... but it just will never happen without going through the technical process...
If you want to get it together... I'll help when I can. I got all this BS together decades ago. There are really no short cuts and you generally need help educating your ears...
-
Here’s the full Barney video:
-
Of course it would. But my point always was that the quickest way to get this is to apply it to something, work with it. There's a limit to endless exercises.
Originally Posted by lydian_dorian
All right, take Autumn Leaves. Can you hear where a two-note sound would be good? Experiment with it. Also remember that you should use different intervals for different places, not just use all thirds or all sixths. Use what is the best sound at the right place. And you don't need to put them in on every note, just where it's effective.
See, one problem here is that I, or rather we, don't really know where you are with it, what you can already do and where you're at. Using octaves is a good start and now you need to vary it. Can you read music?
What key are you playing AL in? Probably Em... and you're practicing in D. Move to G and remember that Em has a D#.
Steady, one thing at a time :-)The trick is with tunes that use chromaticism, etc. and what harmonic intervals to play.
-
Valid question though ... take Autumn Leaves. First phrase in the bridge has a little chromatic approach note. So if we're working on a tune, it does help to have the tools on hand.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
This is a bit of a different thing.
Originally Posted by ragman1
Better (and more easily) understood as rootless shells, a la Ed Bickert. Just search his name (or rootless shell) in the JGO search tab and go to town.Last edited by pamosmusic; 05-01-2024 at 01:22 PM.
-
PS. Take this, but don't let it throw you... yet :-)
What interval is that F# and C? It's your exam!
-
But if you're working with the chords, which is what's really happening, it's the connecting chord tones that matter, not what kind of interval it is. If you come to the B7 then you can't help but put the D# in.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
As for the chromatic rundown, I'd say that's the same thing - if you're going to use two-note punches for that. Which I'm not sure I would, personally. It's not about comping with shells.
-
Listen to the punches. Of course, Bill's doing it quick and modern so take it with a pinch of salt :-)
-
Good lesson, can't go wrong with Barney! I've never thought to approach chord melody by number of voices. I'll have to start doing that. The first thing he said was chord melody sort of implies that you need to use a different chord for each melody note, but that isn't true so he likes to call it harmonic treatment. Exactly what I've been saying but noone listens to me. :P
Originally Posted by Kirk Garrett
-
I do. I listen to everybody. It's an addiction
Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith

-
For what it’s worth, in your recording, you are comping with shells.
Originally Posted by ragman1
I’m also talking about notes in the melody that are chromatic in that they don’t come from the chord or scale and require a different strategy than harmonizing with a third or sixth from the scale.
I was referring earlier to the D# in m16
-
I listened to your advice to listen to the Sinatra versions of tunes when you're learning them because he sticks to the exact melody.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
I was copying what most arrangements do which is insert those chord punches. I don't call that comping and I don't call two-note voicings shell voicings. You might, I don't. Shell voicings are R-3-7 and take the place of chords.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
Don't tell me, tell the OP. It's his party, not mine. I don't care :-)I’m also talking about notes in the melody that are chromatic in that they don’t come from the chord or scale and require a different strategy than harmonizing with a third or sixth from the scale.
I was referring earlier to the D# in m16
-
Gosh, that was a long time ago. Is that the only one?
Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith
-
Rootless shells. So R 3 7 without the R.
Originally Posted by ragman1
Ed Bickert calls it comping, for whatever that's worth.
-
The only piece of advice I've taken from you? Probably not.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
Some people call shells 1-3 or 1-7 I notice…
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
I call 3-7s guide tones? But some people use the term for something else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I’m confused on ragman’s behalf. The melody is E minor at that point? You’d use harmonic or melodic minor as required.
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Point being it’s effectively chord stabs and not really what the OP is asking about.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
I guess six of one in that instance … how about something like All of Me, if we’re sticking to the first few pages in the real book
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
I agree. What he actually said was:
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
But he also references jazz. We're not (presumably) talking about playing Careless Love or Amazing Grace using a lot of sixths and thirds. Which isn't hard but not jazz. It could be jazz but not in its simple form.Playing a melody in thirds, fourths, and various intervals is something I'm very interested in doing
So he has to be clear. As I said before, we don't know exactly where he is with the guitar. Maybe he should play Amazing Grace or something just as simple so he can get off the ground with this.
But, of course, there are very few tunes where you're going to play the whole thing using intervals. He probably ought to start learning chord melody of which intervals are a basic part (rather than just intervals by themselves). Or, indeed, classical guitar.
In fact, I'm going to tell him that when he comes back!
-
The approach... "learning how to play jazz tunes, in a jazz style with out learning the Skills to do so approach",
leads to ... Not being able to play jazz tunes in a jazz style.
Not really great advice
Here's a simple example of "Autumn" with simple intervals of "A" section. Boring, simple would never use.... but is example of using simple intervals with organization... not good or bad, but with use of organization of shape using intervals to imply Tune...using 3rds and 6ths , a 5th and a tri-tone.
pickup
X X 5 X 5 X
X X 7 X 7 X
X X 9 X 8 X
tune
--------------
X X X 9 X 8
-------------
X X X X 8 10
X X X X 7 10
-------------
X X 4 X 3 X
X X 5 X 5 X
X X 7 X 7 X
-------------
X X X 7 X 7
-------------
X X 7 X 7 X
X X 9 X 8 X
-------------
X X X 5 5 X
X X X 7 7 X
X X X 9 8 X
-------------
X X X 11 10 X
--------------
X X X 9 X 8
X X X 8 X 7
-------------
X X X 4 4 X
X X X 6 5 X
X X X 8 7 X
-------------
X X X 6 8 X
-
What am I being asked again?
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos