-
Hi all
I have a recurring question about learning jazz language on guitar.
I spend a lot of time practicing arpeggios, voice-leading ideas and small harmonic concepts, and I understand them in isolation. But I often struggle to use that material freely.
I don’t manage to reach free improvisation and solo guitar or chord melody playing. My goal is to get to a point where I can improvise freely over a standard, in the spirit of guitarists like Joe Pass, Barney Kessel, or Martin Taylor—obviously on a much simpler level.
It feels a bit like understanding the grammar of a language, but not really being able to speak it yet. I strongly feel that there is a more targeted approach to this, and that without guidance I’m not finding it on my own.
How do you personally bridge the gap between studying material and actually integrating it naturally into your playing?
Are there specific practice approaches that help turn arpeggios and patterns into a more melodic, intuitive language?
By the way: does anyone know a guitar teacher in Belgium that specializes in chord melody?
-
01-16-2026 06:25 PM
-
You'll find good advice re: your question in this thread: Trying to put together a simple daily practice routine - help?
-
There's no getting around the fact that you have to put in a LOT of time on the instrument.
Focused practice and learning tunes will help to make that time as effective as it can be, but there's no getting around the fact that you have to play a lot, with a lot of repetition, until your ear-mind-fingers connection becomes strong enough to allow you to express yourself freely without mechanics or the theoretical subtext in the back of your mind getting in the way.
-
I've always organized my technical practice time in two segments. First the strictly technical, learning the arpeggio shape, scale, whatever. Then the musical practice of this, where I play musically, but still base the playing around this scale or arpeggio.
Same with other concepts like chord scales, intros, outros etc. I spend way more time on the musical part rather than the strictly learning the shapes part.
Chord melody has the extra difficulty of being technically challenging. But it is still comprised of phrases with a melody and a rhythm. So I practice chord phrases, I take a small phrase and practice it moving chromatically up and down the neck. So after a while you built a vocabulary and facility with it.
-
I think it is a good idea to split the technical part of the practice into two also - 1. purely generic 2. specific
Originally Posted by Alter
Then when dealing with the specific part, always think ahead - what would the piece be to put this in use.
Then pick up that piece and just try, see how it works out.
Point is, the tecnical practice options are so vast and the bits of it don't get the full attention or time to become a "part of you"
At least that was my experience. Way too many half-learned things, and minority of them got used in a piece.
-
IMHO, you've got to practice everything until your subconscious takes over and it's automatic, so it seems intuitive, but it's really due to constant repetitive practice.
Then, playing live is a different thing, you need to be relaxed enough to be able to play what you've practiced. If you're not relaxed playing live, your hard earned practice won't come out in your playing.
And, find a good teacher.
-
BartLutsh, Yes. I dare say this is a very necessary stage we all must wrestle with and perhaps the most common mystery as a student becomes more than the sum of their parts.
If you were my student, I'd ask you if you really love the music, or do you just want to play it?
Playing this music IS more than knowing the parts; because it's a way of speaking that's something beyond the grammar and the parts. It's a language. There are ways of creating order to your notes that's informed by things like phrases, cadence, dynamics, note weight, ideas (motifs), where your notes are going, what they're doing, a sense of purpose and motion. I don't know about you, but that's what I hear, and that's what I'm drawn to in my playing.
Developing a maturing sense of listening is an important part of advancing from a note player to a musician. How might you do this? What are you listening for? What are you listening to? What are you hearing? How expansive is your awareness of what the player's intentions and sense of design? There's a rich and far reaching history to this music that includes the breath of horn players, the expressions within harmony that piano players used to bring that music to life in percussion and hand language, the way a bass player plays with and around the chord the way some people state the obvious or speak in hints, there's the drive and accent, orchestration and support the drummer chooses to convey... This is where the MUSIC is and listening to more music broadens your sense of possibility. That possibility forms your note choice and helps you see a larger picture of what you can make from the things you learned.
I listen to Bach and I hear the power of movement in a bass line. An awareness of my voice movement.
I listen to Villa Lobos and I hear the textures possible from an arpeggio. I hear new things I want to do with an arpeggiated scale.
I listen to Joe Henderson and I hear the love he has for three notes; how they can inform a sense of motif and propel an idea into a sentence, a paragraph, an essay, a story that makes a solo.
I listen to Holiday, or Lester Young and I hear not notes but a voice speaking in cadences and breath.
These are the things that others have learned to bring their own notes to life. Let them be your teachers. Let them give you ideas. They wrestled with the issues you talk about and they found the answers.
Listen to their recordings and don't listen to the notes, but listen for the answers they are giving you in every breath.
Try it. Learn to love it.
-
It's tempting to think that there must be a linear path towards studying/practicing to playing in a way that does justice to the standards of the genre. This doesn't seem to be the case. That's true even if one's approach to practicing is just playing tunes and improvising. I think of developing as a jazz musician as a process of accumulation and internalization of a variety of things ranging from specific vocabulary elements to broader skills. Practicing with intention where you accumulate things that you can put to use and add to what you already know in a practical way probably is the shortest path. Originally Posted by BartLutsch
-
If you don’t have enough technical skills to play the a Goldbraith arrangement.
Split up the skills into reading, single notes and chords. Which part is giving
You trouble? Don’t worry about improvisation for now, learn some arrangements then start making
Your own simple arrangements.
-
Learn songs. Start with one you admire; hopefully you actually like jazz standards. (there are folks out there who are interested in jazz guitar but don’t actually like the repertoire) Memorize the chords and the melody. Apply your exercises to that song….play the chords on a looper and practice improvising. Move on to your next favorite song all the while still working on first favorite song.
-
Play songs, and play with other people (e.g., teacher, friends, jam sessions; I don't mean immediately jump into performance). It's important to work on technique, harmony, rhythm, scales, phrasing, etc., on their own, but that's like training and drills for a sport. It helps for developing skills and fitness, and for addressing weaknesses, but it's not the sport. If you want to play tennis, you have to play tennis, not hit the ball against a wall or practice your serve on an empty court.
Jazz is the same. It's an ensemble activity that requires interaction with other people in order for you to develop. On the internet it's easy to get the idea that the proper sequence for learning jazz is to learn technique, theory, and "language" before moving on to playing actual music because a lot of people online stress those subjects. But that doesn't work; you have to incorporate real music into your learning from the very beginning.
-
This cannot be stated enough, especially the part about being relaxed playing live. It took me about a thousand actual gigs, and I still have to remind myself occasionally. That meant taking any and every playing opportunity. Jams, crap gigs, etc. It can't be forced. Turning the amp way up above the band and picking more lightly really helped me finalize that goal. You have to be at-home relaxed, which is tough when a bunch of people are watching and you are on the spot. In a way, you have to not care about the result anymore to get the best result. Some level of mental disconnect is involved. Originally Posted by GuyBoden
IMHO, you've got to practice everything until your subconscious takes over and it's automatic, so it seems intuitive, but it's really due to constant repetitive practice.
Then, playing live is a different thing, you need to be relaxed enough to be able to play what you've practiced. If you're not relaxed playing live, your hard earned practice won't come out in your playing.
And, find a good teacher.
-
How many years kids need to develop proper language skills?
Need to keep in mind that all they do is learn when they are kids.
Takes so many years. When we are adults, we can learn much much faster.
"forget grammar and look what the kids do" is the worst kind of advice when trying to learn a new language.
-
I don't know how helpful this might be to the OP, but here goes.
A different view. In this view, jazz melodic improvisation is 1) being able to imagine a good line and 2) being able to make it happen on your instrument. These two goals are separable.
So, taking the second one first, with time on the instrument you become increasingly able to play a line you imagine. You can practice that while you're noodling watching TV -- imitate all the music. Or think of songs you know and play them starting on any note, any fret/string/finger. Whatever you practice will help.
But how do you imagine a good line? Well, you can try it. Strum the chords to a tune and scat sing. When you sing a line you like, put it on the instrument. Now, if you can do that for an entire tune, congrats, you're a jazz musician. You don't absolutely need to do anything else.
Now, if you aren't satisfied with the results you obtain from this approach because you aren't satisfied with your musical imagination, then you may fine it helpful to get into the usual ideas for building vocabulary.
It seems to me that there are two general schools of thought. One is based on copying the masters and figuring out how to get some of those ideas into your playing. A certain amount of theory may be helpful in finding applications. The second general school of thought is more based on what I think of as theoretical devices (I'm hoping that doesn't trigger a debate on what that term means), including triads, arps, scales, harmonic juxtapositions and the like, perhaps practiced in isolation before being applied to tunes.
When you crest one of these hills you will discover a higher hill behind it. For example, it may be difficult to imagine lines at full bop speed, or it may be easier to play harmonic juxtapositions by thinking about the math than mentally hearing the lines.
In dividing things up in this way, I don't want to suggest that these dividing lines are clear or impenetrable. It's more like general guidance than specific rules.
So, to answer the OP's question, I'd suggest some focus on scat singing. If you can do that, you're halfway to the goal. Then, all you have to do is practice playing what you imagine.
If you can't scat sing a good line then maybe you work on that directly, rather than going right to triads, arps, scales, modes etc. You'd do that, perhaps, by listening/copying recordings of jazz players who don't play a lot of notes. Paul Desmond and Hank Mobley come to mind, to name two.
Last point. Whatever strategy you pick, there will be great players who did it differently.
-
Mind you, a "good line" is not the line itself but what it stirrs up in the 3D space!
-
"The material" studied is the tunes. Originally Posted by BartLutsch
"Your playing" is those same tunes.
When one learns to play music from instruction and lessons from a teacher, recitals of performance serve as indication of progress and success. When one goes it alone, a similar object is sought in playing with others. In both the focusing on tunes answers all questions of what to be doing with, 'learning to play tunes, tunes, and more tunes'. Tunes are the learning context and environment through which all else will come, be developed, and internalized. Originally Posted by BartLutsch
Everything that you need to be able to do is
learned in tunes you want to be able to play.
-
This is just not true. Originally Posted by emanresu
-
We have shortcuts Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
And it is true. Originally Posted by AllanAllen
We have abundance of meanings for to the words in our own language.
Babies have none.
-
This is a waste of my time
-
Music is a waste of time. Better do something real.
Reply With Quote
Calling you Framus folk
Yesterday, 09:38 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos