The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Posts 101 to 125 of 164
  1. #101

    User Info Menu

    I find the discussion about fingerboard materials interesting. I'm not totally convinced about the way it affects tone... I've played Telecasters that had rosewood fingerboards that were very bright and snappy, and I've also played maple fingerboard guitars that are very dark sounding (my Gibson L6-S reissue for example).

    The most significant thing about fingerboard material is feel. I think there's really nothing that feels as good under the fingers on a nice archtop as an ebony fingerboard. Nice and smooth, to me it's easier to play on. I've played a Les Paul with a richlite board and I thought it was ebony until I was told otherwise. In saying that I don't think richlite belongs on a Les Paul Custom for example.... a guitar like that deserves real wood.


    It's a shame the ES275s are pretty expensive because they look like a really good instrument. The Hofner that Hammertone posted however looks even better... and it's cheaper....

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #102

    User Info Menu

    The shot of the electronics looks like a 335 to me - note the position of the output jack. It isn't on the top of the two archtops.

  4. #103

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 339 in june
    Even these :
    Attachment 27114 ?
    Maple, not ebony

    The frets are metal .. a material with the property of low compression ... that means most of the string vibrations are going to be transfered to the material underneath ... and the fingerboard material will provide some feedback to the string vibrations


    The same thing will happen with the bridge and the body

    So I find it difficult to think how the fingerboard, neck and body materials could not have some affect on the frequency response of the strings


    Is that affect significant? ... maybe in a quiet room direct into a decent amp one could tell the difference between two similar guitars made with different woods

    I think when you add a band the affect is going to be ever more subtle and difficult to discern .. and then even more so as you add effects and then run it through a PA system or a recording

    Even an experienced listener will probably not be able to tell a Les Paul from an SG on a recording .... or even an LP from a Tele

    But the player will know which guitar feels and sounds best to his or her ear and hands

    And anyone who has ever chased a favorite tone on a recording knows it can be difficult to match that tone without a similar guitar and a similar amp to the ones on the recording

  5. #104

    User Info Menu

    Agreed w/ above post! I think even more so these days , w/ today's recordings you can't even tell what type of guitar is being used unless it hasn't been sanitized,remixed, added plug ins, etc............ And belive me I've been there w/ today's producer/engineers!

  6. #105

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Woody Sound
    Very different. That's a 17" guitar with a long scale fb. More like a 350/Tal than a 275.
    I understand the 17" but much better IMHO

  7. #106

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitfiddler
    Something new, from something old. Gibson appears to be upgrading its import Epiphone Alleykat and Wildkat models...




    I don't see anything on a new Alley Kat. I had one of the originals and liked it. I'd definitely be interested in an upgraded model.

  8. #107

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by neatomic
    pics from the 2016 memphis line starting to appear in time with namm

    a venetian cut 175?..the es- 275

    ES-275 Faded Cherry
    Attachment 26935

    Memphis Jazz Series ES-275 Figured Montreux Burst

    Attachment 26936

    cheers
    That guy must be huge. Those 16" guitars look tiny in his hand.

  9. #108

    User Info Menu



    Review at Namm

  10. #109

    User Info Menu

    Dam i thought i had found home with my 175 but at 5ft6" this smaller guitar ....

    Size does matter, when I first rocked up to my old funk band changing from a 335 to a smaller shaped guitar, a japanese casino, the whole band commented that my playing had improved noticeably, that i was much tighter.

    Maybe I wont have to worry as I don't think Australia has received the 2016 guitars yet and he says there are a lot of back orders on the 275. Great they did a no frills one.

  11. #110

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by theruiz


    Review at Namm
    Talking about the semi-hollow flat-top Les Paul Special: "All of the tone, and feel, is just like every other Les Paul."

    Talking about the laminated maple ES-275: "In Japan, one of the trends in younger players is jazz." "This is EXACTLY an L5, well it's smaller."

    Sheesh.

  12. #111

    User Info Menu

    Maybe it's not actually 16". He says it's 10% smaller than an L5. If that's really true, that would make it about 15-1/3".

    If so, I'm suddenly getting very interested in the fancier model.

  13. #112

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Woody Sound
    Maybe it's not actually 16". He says it's 10% smaller than an L5. If that's really true, that would make it about 15-1/3".

    If so, I'm suddenly getting very interested in the fancier model.
    Could be math isn't his strong side.. but it does in fact look a tiny bit smaller than the es335

  14. #113

    User Info Menu

    15x2 may be a good size for a guy who stands when he plays but not a good size for a sit down player IMO. I think Gibson would have been smarter to bring back the ES350T with a 17 X 2-1/4 body (laminate Byrdland).

  15. #114

    User Info Menu

    what happened to the L9?
    it looks about the same but with a 335 bridge.

  16. #115

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by entresz
    I find the discussion about fingerboard materials interesting. I'm not totally convinced about the way it affects tone... I've played Telecasters that had rosewood fingerboards that were very bright and snappy, and I've also played maple fingerboard guitars that are very dark sounding (my Gibson L6-S reissue for example).

    The most significant thing about fingerboard material is feel. I think there's really nothing that feels as good under the fingers on a nice archtop as an ebony fingerboard. Nice and smooth, to me it's easier to play on. I've played a Les Paul with a richlite board and I thought it was ebony until I was told otherwise. In saying that I don't think richlite belongs on a Les Paul Custom for example.... a guitar like that deserves real wood.


    It's a shame the ES275s are pretty expensive because they look like a really good instrument. The Hofner that Hammertone posted however looks even better... and it's cheaper....
    What's the street price on one of these guitars?

  17. #116

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by pingu
    ….do you expect it to have an acoustic
    voice like half or 2/3 of a 175 or so ?
    if so it could make a nice vibey electric
    without too much feedback ....
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammertone
    I don't know, but I'll find out when I play them at NAMM….
    I checked out the ES-275 at the Gibson room at NAMM. Report to come.

  18. #117

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by vinnyv1k
    15x2 may be a good size for a guy who stands when he plays but not a good size for a sit down player IMO. I think Gibson would have been smarter to bring back the ES350T with a 17 X 2-1/4 body (laminate Byrdland).
    Well to each his own. I'm kinda short, and I find 15" guitars to be the PERFECT size when sitting.

  19. #118

    User Info Menu

    Im 6'3" tall and 15" is ideal for me, sitting or standing!! Bob

  20. #119

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by life_with_a_song
    So these will be having the 24.75" scale length?
    I believe so. He says it has a Les Paul neck.

  21. #120

    User Info Menu


  22. #121

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Top of the Arch!
    Im 6'3" tall and 15" is ideal for me, sitting or standing!! Bob

    Yeah, I've never thought there was much of a correlation between body size and preferred guitar size...what feels good is what feels good.

    I do notice, body depth matters to me a bit more.

  23. #122

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
    Yeah, I've never thought there was much of a correlation between body size and preferred guitar size...what feels good is what feels good.

    I do notice, body depth matters to me a bit more.
    Definitely. I went from a D'Aquisto NY Junior (15" x 2-1/2") To a Sadowsky Jimmy Bruno (14-3/4" x 2-3/4").

    The Sadowsky feels like the bigger guitar with its extra 1/4" depth, even though it is a 1/4" smaller across.

  24. #123

    User Info Menu

    I'd love to see a 1-pickup version, sort of a smaller Wes.

  25. #124

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammertone
    I checked out the ES-275 at the Gibson room at NAMM. Report to come.
    Bring it, Hammer!

  26. #125

    User Info Menu

    Lol a new flat top les Paul.

    Gibson are so desperate to get that bottom market money but they cant leave the US (or wont) so to compete they are having to cut so many costs, they wont even press a top?

    Hilarious.
    Last edited by Archie; 01-25-2016 at 01:28 PM.