-
Same reason people eat crabs. Alot work to get to the meat, but it's delicious.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
10-25-2022 09:58 AM
-
The Elitist nature of "modern" Jazz music certainly does not help....but TV is the culprit...
I'm playing a round of golf recently with an occasional golf partner, we don't really know each other outside of golf.... he asks me what are you going to do this winter? (end of our golf season is soon) I answer I'm going to play more guitar...."Great !what style do you play?" he asks, I say JAZZ! he answers "ohh, I like country"...end of that conversation right there he never talked about it after that...
Not exclusive to Jazz though also true story:
I'm engineering sound at FOH and recording for a ballet company..end of number, lady in front of console turns around and asks me"who composed that last piece" I answer Stravinsky, she turns to her husband sitting next to her and says "we don't like Stravinsky do we?"
I should add that Stravinsky was known for having borrowed extensively from jazz rhythms, or was it the other way around?
During my hippie days our "café" played all the usual suspects : Hendrix, the Doors, Dylan the Cream, Zeppelin,etc..but, only one jazz track, Brubecks "take five"....
S
-
Donald Fagen likes Stravinsky:
So when it comes time to sleep, a problem for anyone on the road after a show, but an ongoing and worsening one for Fagen. So instead of reading, or watching an old movie, he puts on Stravinsky. Comforted, evidently, by the brilliant complexity of the music, he’s able to duck out of consciousness for a while.
-
I wouldn’t say Stravinsky (who was a big jazz fan) shared much of a rhythmic language with jazz, as evidenced by his piece for actual jazz players (the Woody Herman orchestra), the Ebony concerto, which does not swing at all (we know Woody could too obv.)
exhibit a
exhibit b
it is a brilliant piece of music though, and utterly in Stravinsky’s sound world. I would add that some works written by classical composers for jazz instrumentation do swing, Bernstein for instance
anyway this David Bruce vid is typically insightful
-
"...the Ebony concerto, which does not swing at all..."
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
The beauty of this music is that it is brilliantly written.
Write down swinging notes ... it would be difficult, I guess.
-
Stravinsky's "soldiers' tale" where he uses the early Jazz rhythmic form of ragtime .. an interesting article also about his influences ...
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
S
-
IDK
What is jazz about these days?
Guys blowing endless solos over ATTYA. What is the listener likely to take away from that?
Especially when those solos sound an awful lot like those on the previous song.
-
Because nobody plays like this ...???

or this vintage GB...notice the audience just bobbing heads to the beat....
We need more blues in our daily jazz.....
SLast edited by SOLR; 10-26-2022 at 08:10 PM.
-
yeah I think these days it’s easy to overestimate how much music people heard outside of performance at this time, and how score centric composers were. Ragtime is scored music so accessible to the composers of that era. Jazz swing, being un-notatable was not …
Originally Posted by SOLR
Anywya the story reminded me of this; Shostakovich composing jazz without actually hearing any if I remember the story right haha
-
that early Gb tone is RAW
Originally Posted by SOLR
A girl once came up to me after a gig playing hard bop and said ‘hey! What’s this music called, I love it? It’s like blues but more sophisticated!’ No, really.
-
Yeah.... all of which holds until you discover the crabcake... the lazy man's answer to 3 hours of picking.
Originally Posted by DMgolf66
Which is to say in some measure if the virtuosity hides the beauty and artistry of the music - however you define that - so that the artist becomes more important than the art, the audience will fail to engage. Jazz writers recount that Bop comes into being in part to prevent the commercialization of "their music" by folks outside the instrumentalist's cadre. In a word, a choice was made to prefer art to commercial success, and "ownership" by the artist. It divided "the community" at the time, and spilit the audience. The "pop" of Bop was not accepted as a guiding principle. And if so goes the history, than popularity just wasn't the objective... and success in that pursuit meant ...surprise.... jazz became a small venue thing.
But fairly.... folks will remember the bands fans referred to as "sell outs" in rock, too... when they found success by narrowing their creativity to what would sell widely. Some felt "getting their due" in discovery was to abandon "the cool". Others? Making a $ was okay, too. Is it really.... so much different than beer? Ask Budweiser about their IPA craft beers... wait... they don't have any? Right.
Form follows the sought after function. Jazz writers recount how prior to Billie Holiday, most bands chose their singers were hired for their looks. No, rephrase that... the bars that paid the bands specified the owner's girl friend would be the singer? Something like that seems to be the theme of a lot of movies set in the 1930s. Could she sing? Hmmmm.... maybe, but a lot of folks sure enjoyed looking on while they figured that one out. Band members? Maybe not so much, but it did put food on the table.
I remember my surprise in learning that all the classic jazz songs were originally hits with lyrics... and that the version with singers tended to be much more popular, and shorter. Pop music has always struggled in moving past the 2:30 min mark. Exceptions are manifest, but remain exceptions. Like movies where "the long slow pan" became a fad... sometimes you just want to go up tempo and get it over with. Artistry and taste put vituosity into a context where they can get their play, appreciation, etc.
-
Originally Posted by JWMandy
Well reasoned post, JW!
Marinero
-
To which jazz writers are you referring, JWMandy?
My understanding is that bebop was created by musicians who played for pleasure in small groups after a night's work playing in big bands. During the 1950s, those big bands faded away, because people did not go out dancing so much, when they had record players, television and other distractions. The small combos were the remnant of jazz. It is not that the makers of bebop were shunning popularity for purity. Like the makers of post-bop, West Coast jazz, the Third Steam and everything else, they were what remained.
Your comment about female singers is very unfair to the many talented women who sang with bands.
-
You should read Dizzy's autobiography. When they created Bebop, they played those weird heads over familiar changes exactly to confuse their audience. It was like "Can you play How High The Moon" and they came up with Ornithology.
Originally Posted by Litterick
BTW that book should be required reading for anyone interested in the history of jazz.
-
Like a friend says, bop is blues on steroids. That's not a popular opinion but I agree.
Originally Posted by Litterick
300 BPM nervous blues.
I have the 300 BPM Blues. I might have tapped out about 240? I don't know, man.
-
Musicians apparently got paid better for playing clubs rather than dancehalls
-
Why isn't jazz popular?
Because people don't like it?
Not to be condescending.
-
I think all it takes is a quick look at what IS currently popular.
Today's pop music is literally the anti-jazz.
-
25 web pages and counting. Seems popular to me.
-
A very esoteric crowd, AK!
Originally Posted by A. Kingstone
Marinero
-
Those 2:30 min come from the technical limitation of 78 rpm shellac discs. The 3:50 min of later hits that come from the technical limitations of 45 rpm vinyl singles. The limitations of the latter lead to an art form in itself songwriting- and arrangement-wise. But those GASB tunes had to be shortened for shellac. Leave out the verse, one instrumental chorus, a key change most of the time, one vocal chorus.
Originally Posted by JWMandy
-
I've read that the bop guys played the standards but, when they recorded, made up their own heads to avoid paying royalties and get some of their own.
I've also read that they played fast to reduce the number of guys who wanted to sit in. That is, they made the same old tunes harder to play by playing them very fast. Also, I read that the insiders would decide to play the bridge from a different tune to confuse the weaker players. My guess is that if you handle those curve balls you got to be an insider.
Eventually, of course, this evolved into its own art form. And, it didn't take very long.
-
and the it was such a rapid form to spread the music around in, the broadcast format became 3 singles and and an ad or two, in 15min chunks. Radio stations got their add revenue, and you fit into their time limiting format. Ever wondered why they never play the full length version of “Shine on you crazy diamond?”on radio? You conformed or missed out or became consigned to the classical stations happy to play 30 minute concertos but surviving on grants in order to pull it off.
Originally Posted by Bop Head
-
825K views
-
I bailed at 'vasectomy'.



Reply With Quote

Has anyone tried the JHS Clover preamp pedal?
Today, 05:41 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos