It looks like you are not yet registered with The Jazz Guitar Forum. Click here to register, it's easy, fast and free!

The Jazz Guitar Forum

Go Back   The Jazz Guitar Forum > Gear > Guitar, Amps & Gizmos

Jazz Guitar Gazette Premium


Welcome to the Jazz Guitar Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-10-2011, 05:15 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 51
Default

I thought about that, jazzuki, but it's not very convenient because I travel a lot and most gigs I play are in small places. I also can't bring much stuff with me to gigs so...I'm gonna try different guitars to see how I feel. I would love to try the Sadowsky semihollow or the ss15, but they are impossible to find!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-10-2011, 07:27 PM
Carpal55's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NH
Posts: 18
Default

I play an Ibanez AS100 that I've had for 20 years and I love it. Monder I think plays an Ibanez AS75. Sco's guitar is or is based on the AS200. When I bought it I tried the 335 and the Lucille and neither fit me well enough to play gigs with. They're around for a good price I'd recommend trying one.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-10-2011, 07:29 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Just for the record Monder stated it was tough to play his Ibanez I think - he just got used to it (an AS-50 I think). Kreisberg also mentions his 174 "is a bitch to play"... so it might be a matter of working hard!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-10-2011, 07:51 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984 View Post
Kreisberg also mentions his 174 "is a bitch to play"... so it might be a matter of working hard!
Man, you sure wouldn't know it from watching him live. I've seen him twice now and he just owns that 175!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-10-2011, 08:42 PM
Carpal55's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NH
Posts: 18
Default

You're right Jorge it's an AS50. I think the quote you reference is in GP, which is funny cos it's the only GP I own. Here's the whole quote;

"I bought it in 1983 because I liked the way it looked, and because I imagined it would produce a certain sound. When I actually got it, however, it didn’t sound anything like what I’d imagined. But I kept at it and eventually it started sounding the way I wanted. So I don’t know if there’s something going on where you kind of breathe your sound through a guitar and it starts to do what you want it to, but it is really easy to play and it has a nice jazz tone as well as being able to rock out. I can also bend the neck to change pitch, which is something I do fairly often."

So not hard to play but I agree with him on the sound. I tried flats, rounds,and was going to swap the pickups trying to get a certain sound. Then after 10 years with it I gave up and just played it and it turned out it was pretty nice all along I was used to a '51 175 and it sure doesn't sound like that. But I use it mostly on blues and rock gigs, it's great for that!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-11-2011, 04:16 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzpunk View Post
Man, you sure wouldn't know it from watching him live. I've seen him twice now and he just owns that 175!
True! The man just kills... But he said that - I think its even on his website! To me Kreisberg has the best technique because he can play really fast but has huge control over dynamics and his pick sound is strong and accurate but never ear-irritating... I really admire that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-11-2011, 04:22 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpal55 View Post
You're right Jorge it's an AS50. I think the quote you reference is in GP, which is funny cos it's the only GP I own. Here's the whole quote;

"I bought it in 1983 because I liked the way it looked, and because I imagined it would produce a certain sound. When I actually got it, however, it didn’t sound anything like what I’d imagined. But I kept at it and eventually it started sounding the way I wanted. So I don’t know if there’s something going on where you kind of breathe your sound through a guitar and it starts to do what you want it to, but it is really easy to play and it has a nice jazz tone as well as being able to rock out. I can also bend the neck to change pitch, which is something I do fairly often."

So not hard to play but I agree with him on the sound. I tried flats, rounds,and was going to swap the pickups trying to get a certain sound. Then after 10 years with it I gave up and just played it and it turned out it was pretty nice all along I was used to a '51 175 and it sure doesn't sound like that. But I use it mostly on blues and rock gigs, it's great for that!
Exactly! My memory was a little diffuse on that... But I think the same priciple applies - he clearly didn't like that guitar but forced himself to like it. I have an acoustic Ovation that I got because it was a very good deal and needed a good reliable guitar... It wasn't my favorite guitar back then - 200 gigs later I really like it!

I have the same feeling with my x-500 and my 335 clone. Although I like the 335 when I get the X-500 its a whole other story... But I must be able to play good with the 335 because I need it for some gigs and rehearsals - the X-500 is saved for special occasions!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-11-2011, 04:26 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seanlowe View Post
... if you're content with the sound of a 335 but not 339 its probably psychosomatic - theyre the same guitar with different neck profiles afaik.
The 339 (and 359) is a small bodied version of the 335. It was designed to address exactly what the OP is complaining about.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-11-2011, 05:21 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 51
Default

shit, I need to try the 339 again...Spend some time with it, it might be it.


cheers lads
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-11-2011, 08:45 AM
mangotango's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Essex UK
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzpunk View Post
Man, you sure wouldn't know it from watching him live. I've seen him twice now and he just owns that 175!
Yes. but he said that he has had to spend a lot of time learning to control/avoid feedback and know he knows where to stand, when to get off a note (think he said E to F in the middle of the fingerboard).....lot of time invested in that baby.

But, the truss rod cover is missing, there's a coin under the bridge....that guitar has some serious history to it!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-11-2011, 10:39 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Default

I have a '79 ES-335 dot neck. I changed the pickups from Gibson's "Dirty Fingers" pickups (what were they thinking?) to a Seymour Duncan '59 at the neck and JB at the bridge.

I do find that when I'm sitting down and practicing the upper horn seem to press directly into my chest. Not comfortable. I don't play standing up at all any more. But when I did I didn't find it uncomfortable.

I love mine, but it's uncomfortable in a completely different way for me than it is for you.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-11-2011, 11:36 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bronx, New York
Posts: 820
Default

The collings I 35 has a 15inch body, I think they are much better than Sadowsky(also nice guitars), there are 3 different models, I-35 deluxe, regular I 35 and the I 35lc(with laminated body instead of all solid woods)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-12-2011, 04:12 PM
Tom Karol's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston - Metro West
Posts: 1,210
Default

After playing it (the full-size 335 clone) exclusively for the past 10 days - and really enjoying it I might add - I've realized reluctantly that using the strap when playing seated makes it much more comfortable ... except of course that I really don't like to use a strap when playing seated!

And yes, Soco, when I win the lottery (I suppose one needs to buy a ticket now and then to do that though) a Collings Soco Deluxe and an 000-2HC are definitely in my plans!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-13-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cast out of the Rainbow Village, USA
Posts: 403
Default

I find the Collings I-35 a little polite and civil for my taste. I like a little hair; the Collings comes across as a well-shaven well-coiffed gentleman (who minds his manners) in biker leather, and make that Lewis, not Schott.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-13-2011, 03:28 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nion View Post
shit, I need to try the 339 again...Spend some time with it, it might be it.
cheers lads
Check this link on the 339 from Gibson. Note the picture at the top of the article, with the 339 in between a Les Paul and a 335 (size comparison).

Gibson Custom Proudly Presents the ES-339
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-13-2011, 03:40 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 138
Default

The marketing folks at Gibson can be a little boned-headed at times. After they make a lot of hay about the 339/359 having a smaller body than the 335 to address the comfort issue for some people, nowhere on their website do they specify the dimensions of the body. BUT, they seem to go out of their way to tell us that they use Franklin Titebond 50 glue on the neck-body joint (as if anyone gives a crap about that useless tidbit).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-18-2011, 11:51 AM
Dark Star's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 356
Default

I have had the same experience. I am also 5'6" & a 335 just doesn't fit me. It is a drag because I love those guitars & have wanted one for years. I bought a CS-336 & it is a wonderful guitar, although it is different than either a 335 or 339.
You might want to try a 339 once more. IMO they are the best Gibson value out there right now, & they sound great. They regularly sell for less than $1.5K. That's pretty good for a Gibson Custom guitar.
__________________
"...there are people out there violating the marijuana laws. Musicians. And I don't mean good musicians; I mean jazz musicians."
-Harold Anslinger testifying before a Senate Committee in 1948
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-19-2011, 06:45 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 51
Default

Hey Dark Star, you think you can get contemporary jazz tones from the 339? I'm very happy with my sound on my 335, it's just the ergonomics that sucks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-19-2011, 07:01 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

I would say it's up to you to get a "contemporary jazz tone" from any guitar. If the ergonomics fit you better then work on the sound you want. I don't see any reasons for a 339 not to give you a "modern sound" like the 335.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-19-2011, 07:17 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Bucks County, PA
Posts: 87
Default

Maybe put together a parts guitar with a USA Customer Guitars "Downsized T" body? ;-)

USACG - Downsized T

Ed S.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 11-19-2011, 09:18 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nion View Post
Hey Dark Star, you think you can get contemporary jazz tones from the 339? I'm very happy with my sound on my 335, it's just the ergonomics that sucks.
If you can get a good jazz sound out of a humbucker-equipped Telecaster (ie. a slab of wood with 4 screws holding the neck on), then a guitar built like a 339 (or 335) should easily be able to do the same. Having a '57 Classic (or similar) in the neck position will be a big key to that sound. And then the amp is at least 'the other half' of the sound.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-19-2011, 09:31 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 138
Default

BTW - Nion and Darkstar - I too am small (barely 5'7") and I too find the 335 style/size guitar very comfortable while seated. That is OK for me because I'm just a play-at-home hobbyist so I'm always sitting while playing, and will never be standing. But I see what you mean about the guitar suddenly becoming a little 'oversized' when you stand with it.

I have a Peerless Renaissance Custom which is just about identical to the 335 in size and dimensions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-19-2011, 11:29 AM
Dark Star's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nion View Post
Hey Dark Star, you think you can get contemporary jazz tones from the 339? I'm very happy with my sound on my 335, it's just the ergonomics that sucks.
I'd have to say yes. I just strung up my CS-336 w/a set of flatwound strings & while it's not an L-5 it's got great warmth.
My late friend & instructor Mark Bullis had an arsenal of Gibson guitars & among them was a 339. I never heard him play it, but he was something of an old-school player & I doubt if he would have even owned it unless there were some traditional tones in there.
__________________
"...there are people out there violating the marijuana laws. Musicians. And I don't mean good musicians; I mean jazz musicians."
-Harold Anslinger testifying before a Senate Committee in 1948

Last edited by Dark Star : 11-19-2011 at 11:40 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-19-2011, 11:39 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 154
Default

curveball?
Redirect Notice
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-22-2011, 01:52 PM
Bobsynth's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ocean City, MD
Posts: 24
Default Eastman

Try an Eastman T184MX or An ElRey ER2.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 Jazzguitar.be