-
Warren Nunes taught what he call "speed technique" which involved changing the left hand fingering to accommodate the picking. He was mostly an alternating picker.
Originally Posted by BreckerFan
Chuck Wayne's fingerings did the same thing, in a different way. He was a sweep picker.
I haven't studied Gambale, so I'm not commenting on his contribution.
-
12-08-2025 03:32 PM
-
Eighth triplets at 100 bpm is 5 nps
Originally Posted by charlieparker
300 notes per second would be a slightly sharp Eb 4
16ths at 80 bpm is 5.3 nps
Try this... do the tremolo test thinking in triplets emphasizing the first of each triplet.
That means thinking of those first triplet strokes as "down up down up", but what's
happening is "down-up-down up-down-up..." This will let your mind go faster to see
how much faster your hands can go. I'll bet you can hit 8 nps.
Last edited by pauln; 12-08-2025 at 07:54 PM.
-
Monder studied with Chuck Wayne. This is how he learned to pick because that's how all of his students learned to pick. (CW students didn't get a choice in that I gather) PMB posted this.
Originally Posted by James W
CW Picking JJG.pdf
You can see that Monder and Jack Wilkin's right hand techniques are basically identical.
-
Rest of the thread here
Chuck Wayne Picking
-
Here it is! Me stumbling to play 16th notes at around 75 bpm. In the end, I just do a tremolo by locking the wrist which is a completely different technique.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Wzg9mzUd8GU
-
Not to dismiss circular picking but I don't know too many players that I am really into it. Kenny Burrell is one, I think. Of the players I prefer, it seems that they mostly use Benson picking or Gypsy picking.
Originally Posted by brent.h
-
Hmm you say locking the wrist but it does look like your wrist moves when you change to a fast tremolo. Probably a mix of elbow and wrist.
Originally Posted by charlieparker
If you were my student I would advise you to keep practising the tremolo and sixteenth note funk strumming at faster speeds such as 100, 130+BPM.
I think the strumming is useful if done with a loose wrist because it can be a good way of getting wrist motion going - but it doesn't matter if the movement is coupled with some elbow motion.
Personally thumb+finger motion has worked for me, what Brent calls circular picking, but you can use this motion to alternate pick though I do economy pick. But as I said before, things only opened up once I could smoothly tremolo on one string with the thumb+finger motion. There is a knack to it that you discover only experimenting at higher tempos. I could post a video later demonstrating it if you like?
-
So here's my demo. Sixteenth notes at 160 BPM. I've been doing this for about 6 months so it's not dialled in yet.
Tremolo at 160 BPM - YouTube
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
-
Ok I'll take your word for it, despite what I can see.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
But my original point stands - elbow motion is a perfectly legitimate picking motion.
-
Interesting that you are using circular picking, also. Looks pretty efficient. Maybe more people use it than I realize.
Originally Posted by James W
-
What about if you switch off the metronome and just pick as fast you can, but from the wrist as you're doing for most of this video? Maybe try making smaller motions, and also with the pick making a very shallow contact with the string.
Originally Posted by charlieparker
-
Thanks. Yeah it's more common than people might imagine. Brent gave a link to the circular picking thread, check it out. There are also a few videos on Troy Grady's Pickslanting Primer (which is on his website) that will be of interest, one about finger motion itself and another about how jazzers pick. People like Allan Holdsworth, John Scofield and Emily Remler used this motion...
Originally Posted by charlieparker
-
Ok, I've read most of this article now. (Just for the record). All good - except, if I didn't know better, I would be confused by the mention of 'consecutive' picking rather than alternate, that is, how Chuck Wayne would use two consecutive downstrokes or upstrokes, which would appear to be totally illogical if I didn't know that the guy must be referring to string crossing. As such, not a very beginner-friendly article.
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
The older players didn’t have this terminology. Even Gambale referred to his technique as “speed picking” in the 80s. Chuck Wayne is often credited as the originator of what he today call economy picking, but it’s fair to say it has been independently discovered by other players.
Originally Posted by James W
But the specific refinements that differentiate CW picking are explain quite well in the article I think.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I remember reading an interview with Donald Fagen where he said that he wanted to become a jazz artist when he was young, but he couldn't play fast enough. So he took a different path.
Of all the aspects of music that might connect with a general audience, speed is low on the list. When my wife hears (a famous speedy virtuoso guitarist), she makes a face like she ate a bad pickle. She is not alone.
However, if you find yourself jamming with a group of young eager-beaver sax players just out of music school, then yes, speed is very important.Last edited by TF; 12-27-2025 at 07:59 PM.
-
Of you go up at a jam and are the guy who plays tasteful 8th notes after 12 choruses of horn players ripping it up. You’ll be the one who shines.
Originally Posted by TF
-
Yes, that's a little confusing. Chuck Wayne actually described his technique as 'consecutive-alternate'. He would alternate pick in passages with an even number of notes per string but keep picking in the same direction (consecutive) when moving from a string where an odd number of notes occurred. Unlike Joe Pass and Gypsy pickers, this pattern would be followed whether moving in a general upwards (towards to lower 'E' string) or downwards (towards to higher 'E' string) direction. He was one of the first guitarists to play 3nps string scales to the keep these actions consistent and also to facilitate slurring and bursts of speed.
Originally Posted by James W
As Christian suggested, other players of Chuck's generation like Philadelphian Joe Sgro were thinking along the same lines (much like Leibniz and Newton independently inventing calculus). In CW's case, it was seeing Charlie Parker in a nightclub performance that prompted the change.
-
Joe Sgro:
-
100%, this should be repeated again. Winning with less work. It's all about the phrasing and swing of the notes anyways and speed does not usually deliver as hard in that department if only because it is happening to fast for most listeners to digest. Shredding after another shredder without at least building it up first is being musically deaf.
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Regarding Armstrong, it may have had something to do with his technique that led to the change in style. Something to do with his embouchure which wasn't quite the correct way?
Originally Posted by brent.h
-
How do I navigate this music?
If I understand the question (which I might not), I hold the tune in my mind as "how it goes" meaning only how it sounds. However this thing I hold is not a linear "step by step" through the progression harmony as usually represented as written on paper nor memorized as a sequence of changes. To me "how it goes" feels like it is represented as rotations in a space of chord types' sounds.Imagine the type ball has chord symbols instead of a character set; the sequence of rotations presenting the ball's chord types in order for the tune is "how it goes".
Now imagine that the ball is a collection of not chord type symbols but is a collection of the way they phenomenologically sound, that is closest to the internal feeling. Every change of harmony is a geometrical movement within a space of sound.
The more I read that back the stranger it sounds... still my best sense of it.
How much do I improvise?
In a trio, almost continually, intros, chords, melody, solos proper, comping, endings
Improvise with the melody?
Of course
Improvise with the bop idiom
Unless swing, blues, gypsy, fusion, chord melody is advised (see What? below)
How much rhythms to add?
Rhythm is functional, foundational, a given; integral, not additive
When do I play?
In a trio, pretty much almost all the time in various ways
How do I play?
By ear, aural intuition, exclusively. No books, charts, lead sheets
I play "barefoot"; clean no pedals
What do I play?
Jazz from 30s to 60s, some Latin, popular, a dozen tunes I've composed. For individual tunes, I gauge the audience, use my musical judgement, and go for the best balance of authenticity, appropriateness, and allure (the Jazz versions of the ancient trancendentals of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty)
-
I'm just starting to dig into the Troy Grady stuff but I watched the whole Pickslanting Primer just now and it's very helpful. I found the whole thing a bit cheesy and I have zero interest in metal music but ultimately picking notes on the string is not genre specific.
I'm really interested in the Antigravity Idea (as far as I understand it). Mostly downward pickslanting but upwards when needed. I've been doing pretty strict gypsy picking for a couple years and this seems like something I can adapt to.
-
It's good that you're finding the Grady stuff useful.
Originally Posted by sully75
I subscribed to your youtube channel and had noticed you're a downward pickslanter.
-
I've been working on more or less pure gypsy jazz picking for a couple of years. I am not fast, but the motion feels natural to me. But it does limit the way you can play a lot of things, so I would like something that I can add to it.
Originally Posted by James W



Reply With Quote

Quilter's Aviator Cub UK sale July 4th today only $420.
Today, 08:59 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos