-
It did... I could accuse fws6 of absconding with it in the dead of night, but that would be quite a tall tale. I'm just very glad it found another happy home.
Originally Posted by Jazz_175
-
09-09-2015 11:29 AM
-
Jack, I understand your love of these. I love everything about my 1972 ES175D. It has plenty of thunk, weighing in at 5.8lbs, the neck is 1 5/8" at the nut. Skinnier neck than my other archtops, I still enjoy playing it. Bought it brand new when I was 20 years old. All original. I considered an L5 at the time but opted for this one. I liked the size and how it played and felt.
-
I pulled the volume pot out, and it has no markings on it! It is housed in one of those shielded casings, but the cover is off, so I could see the back of the pot. The tone pot is still fully covered, and I'm not removing it. The mystery of '63 vs. '67 will probably remain!
-
Either way, 63 or 67, you have a guitar that you love. That is all that matters in the end...
-
the nut width and lack of Union Made on the label to me points to pre '66
chrome t.p. is '65 [transition year] or later as well as your tuners.
it's possible you have a replacement t.p. [as we know the zig zag is prone to cracking @ the hinge]
and tuners.
also as I mentioned, the color would be very different, compare yours to the one Franz posted.
his is certainly '65 or later.
so I'm thinking '63 is more likely.
-
By all means then, TAKE IT!
Originally Posted by jzucker

It's fun to see the flow of your inventory. I ended up with a Tal Farlow, an SE, and an Aria PE190. Proof that living in the moment means never knowing what will end up in ones inventory. Have fun!Last edited by 2bornot2bop; 09-09-2015 at 09:27 PM.
-
"It's fun to see the flow of your inventory."



Reply With Quote


“Shearing style”
Today, 05:26 PM in Comping, Chords & Chord Progressions