-
I'd guess they would sound really, really dead. Or maybe not? What flatwound or flatwoundish strings would do the trick on a flat top? And do you think that different sized bodies would matter? For example, dreads tend to have a deeper bass response whereas a 00 will be a little more punchier in the mids.
Whatcha got? Whatcha done? Whatcha know?
-
12-08-2010 01:26 PM
-
I like these quite a bit:
Thomastik-Infeld Acoustic Guitar Plectrum Bronze Flat Wound/Bronze Round Wound Light, .011 - .050, AC111
The low E is round to keep it from getting too thud-ish.
They play and sound great on smaller size concert or parlor size guitars as well as Jumbos and Dreads. (But do we really need more dull squash-bottom dreads?) No thud or boom from the low strings.
-
Wow! Very interesting, NiAg!
I, too, prefer small-body flat tops. What guitar do you use/heard these on?
-
I would have liked a heavier set, but I see the heaviest are 12s and they only have a flat wound G string. The D, E and E strings are all round wound.
-
Yeah, just noticed that, too.
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLoveHandles
Still, I'm going to give the 11s a shot.
-
Try hunting these down,
Galli Flatwound Bronze
A smooth sounding string. The hexagonal core of the wound strings is wound with flat 80/20 bronze ribbon wire. comes in 11's
-
I've done regular flats on a flattop. Didn't last long, sounded very...cardboardy.
Originally Posted by Stackabones
-
Thanks for the tip. If the T-I strings don't work out, I'll seek out the Galli.
Originally Posted by jazzbow
I'd figured as much -- but experience really lets you know, ya know? Do you recall if it was on a dread, 000, 00, etc?
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
It was a seagull S6+Spruce-- slope shouldered dread with a gibson scale.
-
Those Seagulls are great gits, Mr B. Just an aside, do you have any opinion on how that Seagull measures up to, say, a Gibby J45?
-
Oddly enough, the only Gibson flat top I've ever played was a J-45!
The Gibson sounds a lot more like you'd expect a drednaught to sound, IMHO--plenty of bass and top end sparkle, not so much in the mids. It was a beautifully crafted instrument--fit and finish were flawless.
The Seagull is a little more "flat" in it's response--It doesn't have as rich a bass or as sparkly a high, but it also has more mids. I really like my old 'gull, I need to pull her out of the case more often. It's a workman's guitar, nothing flashy, but solidly built, and it's served all the flattop acoustic needs (which admittedly, aren't many) I've had over the last 15 years.
-
Very interesting, Mr. B. As you know, the J45 (the Workhorse) is the slope-shoulder dread that all follow. I like midrangey gits, so I may prefer the Seagull.
-
certainly, your wallet would!
-
-
>>>small-body flat tops. What guitar do you use/heard these [T-I Plektrum flats] on?
A Parkwood PW320M. A VERY inexpensive (mint used is $300 or under) guitar for what it is and how it sounds.
Yes, a set of .012 to something would possibly be better, but the PW-320and the T-I .011 flats may surprise you. Really articulate sounding - and then you spend a good hour doing up/down the FB stuff that would normally sound like a car chase on Starsky and Hutch, but now just flows.
In my opinion.
-
I've played those Parkwoods, NiAg. Good gits all around. I use 11s on my gyspy jazz box (different beast), 11s on my electric, 12s on my acoustics -- so I think I'll like the T-I 11s.
-

Only the 6th string is wound. The 5th, 4th, and 3rd are flatwounds, and the 2nd & 1st are plain. Light gauge string set. I've had these on for a week before recording. First impressions were that the guitar really opened up: very rich and chimey, almost like a different guitar. I had D'Addario EXPs before and they are decent strings, but they lose their charm rather quickly ime. Though I haven't had these on too long, I really love the feel and responsiveness.
I've put these on my Yamaha FS720S, which is a short scale neck (24.9"). These light gauge strings on a short-scale neck make the guitar feel quite pliable -- tension is definitely looser than previous strings. I really enjoy being able to employ a light touch while playing this guitar with these strings.
The volume has dropped a bit, but I think it's a wonderful thing. I don't like loud guitars (especially when singing), except when I'm at jams -- and then I take my Gitane D500. Mind that there is still plenty of volume, but it is not overbearing at all and has a gentle character to it, not at all brash.
Recorded using my Zoom H4n and I used GarageBand to trim the front and end off and adjust the balance and levels a bit. During the first verse I played over the soundhole, and then (to give you an idea of the responsiveness) I played closer to the bridge in the second verse. The rest is pretty much over the soundhole. Arrangement is me reading out of a fake book. The little tag at the end is my idea.
O Christmas Tree
-
Nice playing and tone, Stackabones and not a hint of the typical acoustic guitar squeak.
-
Thanks, Peter. I'm having a blast with these strings, and they've really opened up something new for me on this Yahama. I also starting to wonder about putting low-tension strings, especially flatwounds, on my electrics -- if they exist?
-
FWIW a lot of The Beatles acoustic recordings were done with flat wounds.
Interesting about those Thomastiks with the round wound E.
Gibson used to offer a Johnny Smith set years ago that had round wound G D and A and a flatwound E.
-
I've had my S6- spruce for the same time. Like you, I don't play it half enough. I had it set up professionally a couple of years ago-the works (Graphtech saddle, nut and pins, all properly done)- and it really sings. Much better bass response and better highs. I use Martin's MSP4100's-phospherbronze 12';s
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
I had no idea. Too cool!
Originally Posted by Flyin' Brian

Sounds like Smith's set was opposite of the T-I. Do you think he used that kind of set on his recordings? It would make sense if he did since he had a sig string set.
-
Glad the T-I's are working out for you.
The Gibson set makes no sense to me at all. But it must have worked for someone at some time.
I remember the difficulties all in all with Gibson strings. They used to have a great guitarist, the late Mike Elliot, travel to larger dealers and do evening demos. So when he came to where I worked as a luthier/tech, we had to set up every Gibson in the place (a good 15 guitars) to his liking. It was a long day. And since we HAD to use Gibson strings, there were plenty of dead and hard to intonate strings that we tossed.
EDIT: I have no idea who made Gibson strings in the early 80's, nor do I know who makes them now. They may be great now, but they sure were marginal back then.
But back on this thread,...
T-I do other odd things that end up sounding fine.
I use the .012 BeBops, but I throw out the plain .020 G and use a T-I BB021, which is labeled a round wound .021. But it is flat - either flatwound or ground flat like a D'A "half round". I never pulled one apart to see.
But it sounds extremely well balanced with the roundwound D, A ,a nd low E.Last edited by NiAg; 12-23-2010 at 02:40 PM.
-
... I am still using the Johnny Smith configuration ... on my electric guitar and, ... if my recollection serves me well - there were flat-wounds on John McLaughlin’s flat-top (Gibson Dove?) during the Extrapolation and Lifetime period, but ... there was, also, a De Armond pickup on the guitar.
-
Bojan, did you know about the Johnny Smith config before you started using it or did you find it through experimentation? Tell me more about your experience using it, please.



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos