The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Posts 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    TF
    TF is offline

    User Info Menu

    At least three times over my long life, I've bought a 335 or same-size guitar, then months later gotten rid of it. Too big for my short arms!

    I like the look and sound of this type of semi-hollow, but... I gotta not buy these, for this reason... any agreement here? Maybe 339-type would be better, either expensive or medium-priced...

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    My Epiphone ES-339 Pro is a Swiss Army guitar. Flawless, versatile, good PUs. Main testing instrument for my cab manufacture.

  4. #3

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TF
    At least three times over my long life, I've bought a 335 or same-size guitar, then months later gotten rid of it. Too big for my short arms!

    I like the look and sound of this type of semi-hollow, but... I gotta not buy these, for this reason... any agreement here? Maybe 339-type would be better, either expensive or medium-priced...
    I cut my teeth on a 335 (new in '74) as a teen and into my early 20's. Now an "old guy", I switched to nothing bigger than 15" several years ago and have been very happy. Limits your choices a bit, but there are plenty of 14"-15" archtops and semi's out there for the picking, at most price points.

    (Edit - I saw that Jon Herington switched from his 335 to a 339-type a while back.)

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    I've had 10 big bodied hollow or semi hollow guitars in my time. I'm not a big guy (5'6"). I do my best with those.

    When I went to LP's or a 339 , I was not comfortable with them, sitting or standing.

    So my advice : try out a few guitars that you have in mind, or maybe don't have in mind, and try them sitting AND standing (with a strap on it). I find that pickup placement, and the neck-join point also have a big influence on comfort, reach and picking.

    I will be selling my Casino because the p/up, and neck join put my picking (right hand) at a disadvantage. Also, the upper fret area for playing is too far below my head - I play better on 335's.

    My point is: check out all of the ergonomics. Good luck.

  6. #5

    User Info Menu

    Sounds like you might benefit from a Telecaster?

    Or, if needing/wanting a Gibson perhaps a smaller body + 24 3/4” scale length like an L-4 or ES175?

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Marker
    Sounds like you might benefit from a Telecaster?

    Or, if needing/wanting a Gibson perhaps a smaller body + 24 3/4” scale length like an L-4 or ES175?
    Huh? Those are even bigger (wider) than the OP's 335!

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    They are exactly the same, actually but the ergonomics of them are quite different from a 335 style.

  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TF
    At least three times over my long life, I've bought a 335 or same-size guitar, then months later gotten rid of it. Too big for my short arms!

    I like the look and sound of this type of semi-hollow, but... I gotta not buy these, for this reason... any agreement here? Maybe 339-type would be better, either expensive or medium-priced...
    Try a 330. Neck is shorter joining the body at the 16th fret rather than the 19th. And what a great guitar.

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Marker
    They are exactly the same, actually but the ergonomics of them are quite different from a 335 style.
    Whaa..?

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    335 too big - ?-guitar-seated-position-big-archtop-png

  12. #11

    User Info Menu

    they all have a 16” bout - depending on the ergonomics of the player, 335s can seem weirdly wide and thin and the other style can be more comfortable.

  13. #12

    User Info Menu

    In addition to a Gibson ES339 check out the CS356 and CS336 models. Keep in mind that each will have a slightly different neck profile, so that may be another consideration.

    Good hunting!

  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitfiddler
    In addition to a Gibson ES339 check out the CS356 and CS336 models. Keep in mind that each will have a slightly different neck profile, so that may be another consideration.
    Yeah, that's what I meant about Herington switching to a "339-type" model. There are a few, and I'm not sure which one he went with. I think the ES models have traditional top/back/sides/block, but the CS series are chambered/hollowed out bodies, probably heavier. Myself, I'm kinda partial toward the ES-359.

  15. #14

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Woody Sound
    I cut my teeth on a 335 (new in '74) as a teen and into my early 20's. Now an "old guy", I switched to nothing bigger than 15" several years ago and have been very happy. Limits your choices a bit, but there are plenty of 14"-15" archtops and semi's out there for the picking, at most price points.

    (Edit - I saw that Jon Herington switched from his 335 to a 339-type a while back.)

    Actually, Jon plays an ES336 not a 339....


    Arnie...

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    I find the 335 very comfortable to play sitting or standing and I am not tall. 5'8. Agree that everyone is different tho...
    Last edited by joebloggs13; 12-07-2025 at 11:35 PM.

  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    I have a 335 and 339 as well as a 356. The 7/8 body makes it much more fun to play.

  18. #17
    TF
    TF is offline

    User Info Menu

    Thanks for the replies to my OP.

    I have been a Telecaster player for decades, but the semi-hollow sound and vibe still attract me.

  19. #18

    User Info Menu


  20. #19

    User Info Menu

    I am a big guy and find a 335 is basically ideal in size.

  21. #20

    User Info Menu

    I can't think of the model names, but perhaps one of the semi hollow telecasters would work. Fender, G&L, Reverend etc

  22. #21

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by arnie65
    Actually, Jon plays an ES336 not a 339....


    Arnie...
    See the post before yours.

  23. #22

    User Info Menu

    I agree, a little too big for me.

  24. #23

    User Info Menu

    But the trade off for an ES-335 is a specific Mid Range Tonality. Especially on a good one! I’ve owned several 335’s,339’s as well as a myriad of Thinline alternatives. Pat Martino,Hamer Monaco,Korina Studio, Newports, Carvin Fatboy, G&L Asat Super, and many others.

    The Gibson ES-335 at least the the correct original spec models have a certain tonality that’s pretty hard to beat!

  25. #24

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by jads57
    But the trade off for an ES-335 is a specific Mid Range Tonality. Especially on a good one! I’ve owned several 335’s,339’s as well as a myriad of Thinline alternatives. Pat Martino,Hamer Monaco,Korina Studio, Newports, Carvin Fatboy, G&L Asat Super, and many others.

    The Gibson ES-335 at least the the correct original spec models have a certain tonality that’s pretty hard to beat!
    Were your 339's ES, or CS? Big difference there. The ES construction is more like a 335, the CS construction is more like a Pat Martino.

  26. #25

    User Info Menu

    I tried to buy a ES339, and that one is a semi Les Paul, not a smaller ES335. And it really felt wierd for me, the neck felt too long on that smaller body.
    Try more in the 15 1/2 inch options.
    My Ibanez AS50 is right between the ES339 and ES335, and is perfect