-
Not necessarily the best sounding, but the absolutely loudest acoustic archtop I’ve ever played was a 1947 Epiphone Broadway. It was unreal, and I’ve played way more than a few acoustic archtops at this point, including some with huge, room filling volume. I didn’t get a chance to do a back to back, but I’m pretty sure it could best a Stromberg or even some crazy loud Emperors I’ve played. I don’t even think there are a lot of Macaferri style guitars that could beat it.
Originally Posted by omphalopsychos
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
02-08-2024 03:40 PM
-
The great thing about going the vintage Epiphone route is the cost means I have time to look around as I build up my budget with bar gigs.
The time will also let me see how the big band thing works out. Like I said, I've only been to one rehearsal. Plenty of time for me to feel it out and decide if I need an amp or not.
-
Thanks Jeff!
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
You haven't heard the Bands I started out with though!
Anyway, there's no point in not just trying it out! Telling your bandmates that "this is as loud as it'll get" might motivate them to get the dynamics right!
This is just something I'm really passionate about! There's soooo much fun to be had with this kind of playing.
Paul
-
That's the best answer right there, really.
Originally Posted by Webby
-
Yeah Webby, that’s basically my plan. Show up to a rehearsal without an amp and just go for it.
While I have your attention…. Any tips for navigating charts out at home practice besides just playing them over and over?
-
More cool guitars I plan to sell that are under $1,500 and can easily have pickups attached (I don't even know if the pickup works, on the Höfner 459 below):
Last edited by Hammertone; 02-08-2024 at 06:55 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Hammertone
Wait wait wait. I didn't realize you were pitching me sales.
-
No worries. Some of us have a lot of extra acoustic archtops. Chuck is running a business and has some great guitars. I'm just downsizing after a life of collecting many more archtop guitars that I now want or need. The point is that there are lots or really nice older, high-quality acoustic archtop guitars out there for $1,500 or less.
Last edited by Hammertone; 02-08-2024 at 08:37 PM.
-
Which one would you say projects the most sound?
Originally Posted by Hammertone
-
Sheesh, now I need to find them and sort that out. To come....
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
The same distance as a normal archtop. The G400 is an acoustic archtop model.
-
This just popped up in the "Reverb feed" I didn't know I had:
Pre Owned The Loar LH-650 - Vintage Sunburst Inc. Case | Reverb
Bummer, it's in the UK but it looks like a good one (and those original cases are surprisingly good from what I heard).
-
Nice guitar. The case is very good. I have one for my 700. It would be a real pain if the perimeter zip broke though.
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
I’ve admittedly never played a Loar LH-650, but I’ve played many L-4C example on which it appears based. I’ve never played an L-4C that had the cut and power for acoustic big band style work, so I would be very skeptical that this Loar model would have the stuff to do it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Certainly, as with any gigbag btw. Repairing would probably cost more than getting a new case/bag (and with the Loar original case that would be impossible. I know, I tried - mine came without case.)
Originally Posted by garybaldy
-
My MIL could re zip a gig bag but possibly not the rigid Loar zip up case.
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
The 650 is a cut 600, and from what I always heard the 600/700 are modelled after the L5 (EDIT: the original, 16" L5 of course). The consensus elsewhere is that a cutaway doesn't have to alter the sound in any significant way so if a 600 or 700 is loud enough for the job the 650 shouldn't be far behind.
Originally Posted by ThatRhythmMan
-
I don’t even come close to believing it. One could easily argue that the L-4C is a Florentine cutaway 16” L-5 based guitar. I’ve never played an L-4C that comes remotely close to a good 16” Gibson or Epiphone non-cut. I’ve also never played any Loar non-cut that could cut in that league either, FWIW.
Originally Posted by RJVB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
There are a lot of 0s that hint at why no one should expect that either, FWIW.
Originally Posted by ThatRhythmMan
Still talking about the original models, of course, the ones that were never built with the assumption they'd be used as e-guitars anyway.
-
It possible to get a vintage 16” Epiphone (granted not a Deluxe or Broadway) for not that much more than that Loar.
Originally Posted by RJVB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Take your time. I don't rush into things.
Originally Posted by Hammertone
-
Hear, hear! For me, it was a customer's '49 Triumph Regent. The volume was exceptional.
Originally Posted by ThatRhythmMan
'47 Blackstones, IME, also have exceptional volume.
-
I bought my 1950 Epiphone Triumph for $1400.00 Admittedly a little beat and with a few repaired cracks but plays and sound great. I call it the BEAST!
Thanks John
-
No financial interest, but this could work, albeit over budget:
Epiphone Zenith Arch Top Acoustic Guitar (1936) | RetroFret
-
My dog got constipated and 3 vet trips, culminating to... manual extraction, took away my guitar budget.
C'est la vie



Reply With Quote

Andy Bartosh plays "Peter Green"
Today, 04:01 PM in Composition