Thinline acoustic archtop?

[raymoan]

For various reasons, I'm playing unplugged most of the time. I have a thinline (2"), carved-top, true hollowbody archtop, with two set-in pickups. It's plenty loud unplugged, but I'd like a fuller, richer, more complex sound. The obvious answer is a full-thickness, acoustic archtop, but I find a guitar of that size too awkward and uncomfortable to play. So I suppose I'll continue with a thinline.

I'd be grateful for your thoughts on the following questions:

1. How much are the two pickups on my guitar degrading its acoustic sound?

2. Is there such thing as a thinline -- 2.5" thick or less, let's say -- acoustic archtop? (For these purposes, a guitar with a floating pickup would qualify as an acoustic; anything with a set-in pickup would not.)

3. If there is no such thing, is that because such a thin body won't permit anything like a real acoustic archtop sound?

4. Would a thinline with only a single set-in pickup sound appreciably better unplugged than my two-pickup thinline?

Thank you for your consideration.

Ray

[raymoan]

Would be grateful for the benefit of your knowledge and experience.

[Danny W.]

Gibson built a number of fully acoustic L-5CT models, typically 17" x 2 & 3/8" or 2.5"

I've owned these:







They can be pretty loud, but typically lack bass compared to the full-depth model.

Danny W.

[sgosnell]

An Eastman T145 or T146 is generally pretty loud. The one I owned was louder than my flat-top acoustics. At 1.75" deep they don't have the bass or complex overtones of a full-depth model, but they have plenty of volume. Both have single set pickups, but the pickup near the neck doesn't affect the volume nearly as much as a bridge pickup, because the top doesn't vibrate that much near the neck, compared to the bridge. I've pretty much given up on full-depth guitars because they're uncomfortable for me as I age. I have a very nice Wu that has plenty of volume and a sweet voice, at ~2-3/8" deep. Wu makes some very, very nice guitars, but they're not often on the market, so you may have to make a custom order if you want one. I'm not selling mine.

[raymoan]

Wow, thank you for that, Danny -- they're gorgeous. Glad to know that they exist.

[raymoan]

An Eastman T145 or T146 is generally pretty loud. The one I owned was louder than my flat-top acoustics. At 1.75" deep they don't have the bass or complex overtones of a full-depth model, but they have plenty of volume. Both have single set pickups, but the pickup near the neck doesn't affect the volume nearly as much as a bridge pickup, because the top doesn't vibrate that much near the neck, compared to the bridge. I've pretty much given up on full-depth guitars because they're uncomfortable for me as I age. I have a very nice Wu that has plenty of volume and a sweet voice, at ~2-3/8" deep. Wu makes some very, very nice guitars, but they're not often on the market, so you may have to make a custom order if you want one. I'm not selling mine.

Thanks for the description and analysis of the Eastman T146. It makes intuitive sense that the bridge pickup has more effect on the top's responsiveness. The Eastman AR503 and AR580 each have a single pickup and are said to be 2-9/16" thick. Something to look into maybe.

I'm intrigued by the things I've read about the Wu guitars on the forum, and encouraged to hear about a 2-3/8" guitar with a nice acoustic sound.

[Danny W.]

Here's the great Steve Jordan playing an L-5CT:

Danny W.

[Woody Sound]

What is your current guitar, and what is your price range for the new one?

[raymoan]

Here's the great Steve Jordan playing an L-5CT:

Danny W.

Nice! Holding the guitar in that horizontal Freddie Green sort of way, the thickness wouldn't matter much ergonomically, which suggests that he simply preferred the sound of the L-5CT.

[raymoan]

What is your current guitar, and what is your price range for the new one?

Current guitar is an Eastman T146SMD, which I suspect is identical to the guitar described by sgosnell, with the exception of an added bridge pickup.

My pain tolerance tops out at about $1800.

[pingu]

The Ibanez AF guitars are about 2.75" thick at the rim
I practice with one AF81 acoustically and its very comfortable

(disclosure .... I have half stuffed it with soft foam which
reduces the volume and the top end slightly ,
but that's just my taste i like a very warm tone,
eg Eastmans and Godins are too bright for me)

They're inexpensive and and very well built ,
just set it up with your preferred strings and required action
and put a decent pu in the neck position
and all is good ....

[Woody Sound]

The Ibanez AF guitars are about 2.75" thick at the rim
I practice with one AF81 acoustically and its very comfortable.

It sounds to me like he wants a solid carved top(?)

[raymoan]

It sounds to me like he wants a solid carved top(?)

Yes, on the assumption that acoustic archtops typically have solid carved tops because a solid top produces a more pleasing acoustic sound.

[sgosnell]

I don't think you can go wrong with an Eastman, at least with a one-pickup model. I tend to avoid anything with a bridge pickup, because I prefer a more acoustic sound and I never use a bridge pickup for anything. Some people prefer having a bridge pickup because it dampens the vibrations of the top, giving a more electric sound. But if I wanted that, I would get a semi or something like that, with a laminated top. It's a matter of taste, and mine is not exactly the same as anyone else's.

[pingu]

Yes, on the assumption that acoustic archtops typically have solid carved tops because a solid top produces a more pleasing acoustic sound.

solid top ,
oh ok , sorry dude !

[citizenk74]

For various reasons, I'm playing unplugged most of the time. I have a thinline (2"), carved-top, true hollowbody archtop, with two set-in pickups. It's plenty loud unplugged, but I'd like a fuller, richer, more complex sound. The obvious answer is a full-thickness, acoustic archtop, but I find a guitar of that size too awkward and uncomfortable to play. So I suppose I'll continue with a thinline.

I'd be grateful for your thoughts on the following questions:

1. How much are the two pickups on my guitar degrading its acoustic sound?

2. Is there such thing as a thinline -- 2.5" thick or less, let's say -- acoustic archtop? (For these purposes, a guitar with a floating pickup would qualify as an acoustic; anything with a set-in pickup would not.)

3. If there is no such thing, is that because such a thin body won't permit anything like a real acoustic archtop sound?

4. Would a thinline with only a single set-in pickup sound appreciably better unplugged than my two-pickup thinline?

Thank you for your consideration.

Ray

[raymoan]

I don't think you can go wrong with an Eastman, at least with a one-pickup model. I tend to avoid anything with a bridge pickup, because I prefer a more acoustic sound and I never use a bridge pickup for anything. Some people prefer having a bridge pickup because it dampens the vibrations of the top, giving a more electric sound. But if I wanted that, I would get a semi or something like that, with a laminated top. It's a matter of taste, and mine is not exactly the same as anyone else's.

Completely makes sense. I had an ES-335, which, in addition to weighing a ton and relentlessly trying to slip off my leg, had a very anemic unplugged sound (not its fault, obviously, not having been designed for that). Sounded pretty great for rock and blues, though.

My interests and tastes having changed, I don't have any use for a bridge pickup, either.

[RobbieAG]

You might also consider an Ibanez George Benson model (GB10). It has a smaller body and floating pickups.

[jads57]

Guild made some sort of acoustic thin line double cutaway back in the 1990s Even though it's a flat top it might do what you your looking for?

[raymoan]

You might also consider an Ibanez George Benson model (GB10). It has a smaller body and floating pickups.

Looks like a premium quality guitar. The body is indeed smaller than average at 14-3/4" wide, but at 3-3/8" it is not a thinline body. In any event, its list price of $3599.00 is one penny short of twice my budget. Thanks for the suggestion, though -- I enjoyed looking into it.

[raymoan]

Guild made some sort of acoustic thin line double cutaway back in the 1990s Even though it's a flat top it might do what you your looking for?

Thanks for the suggestion, it's an interesting idea. A quick search turned up a single cutaway, called the Songbird, which is only 1-7/8" thick (and pretty affordable). A double cutaway turned up, too, but it was full thickness.

[Danny W.]

Guild made some sort of acoustic thin line double cutaway back in the 1990s Even though it's a flat top it might do what you your looking for?

Thanks for the suggestion, it's an interesting idea. A quick search turned up a single cutaway, called the Songbird, which is only 1-7/8" thick (and pretty affordable). A double cutaway turned up, too, but it was full thickness.

Guild Studio 24 Artist, designed by George Gruhn. According to my records I bought one from George in '86, sold it two years later to Tom Van Hoose. It was a very nice guitar with an outstanding neck shape that George told me he copied from a '63 Kessel. I had a '63 Kessel Custom and the Guild neck felt very similar. Although I liked it very much, I didn't have any particular use for it at the time. It did sound very much like the flattop it was and I don't think it would be a good substitute for an acoustic archtop.

If I have a photo it's misfiled, but here's what Guild says about it:

Guild Studio 24 - Westerly Guild Guitars

Danny W.

[Just Fred]

I confess that this thread had me doing research before posting. For decades, my go-to guitar was a 1957 Gibson ES-225t. Trying to figure out the kind of sound you were looking for reminded me that I played this guitar mostly acoustically, because I was young, poor, and had an infant whose sleep would have been disturbed by amping it. Little did I realize what you're describing fits my experience to a "T."

But - and I admit this is a big "but" - My playing acoustically wasn't for public performance. In fact, I still play acoustically a lot - even with electrics. These days, after adding an ES-335 to my collection, I wound up getting an Ibanez AG95QA, which plays the best of the three. Still, there is no mistaking (to me) that what I'm playing is a guitar designed to be played plugged in, and that's not what I'm doing. It almost startles me to hear the difference when I plug in!

The ES-225 is 1.75" thick. As is the ES-335. By comparison, my Ibanez is 2.75" thick. My 225 is the single pickup model, which has the P-90 in an odd location; the 335 and the Ibanez have two, in the standard bridge and neck positions.

I've likely not answered your question, but I still am not quite sure what sound you are seeking. I know that when I want the sound of an acoustic guitar, I play an acoustic. When I just want the "feel" of an unplugged hollowbody, then I have my choice. But they don't equal the sound of a pure acoustic.

[raymoan]

I confess that this thread had me doing research before posting. For decades, my go-to guitar was a 1957 Gibson ES-225t. Trying to figure out the kind of sound you were looking for reminded me that I played this guitar mostly acoustically, because I was young, poor, and had an infant whose sleep would have been disturbed by amping it. Little did I realize what you're describing fits my experience to a "T."

But - and I admit this is a big "but" - My playing acoustically wasn't for public performance. In fact, I still play acoustically a lot - even with electrics. These days, after adding an ES-335 to my collection, I wound up getting an Ibanez AG95QA, which plays the best of the three. Still, there is no mistaking (to me) that what I'm playing is a guitar designed to be played plugged in, and that's not what I'm doing. It almost startles me to hear the difference when I plug in!

The ES-225 is 1.75" thick. As is the ES-335. By comparison, my Ibanez is 2.75" thick. My 225 is the single pickup model, which has the P-90 in an odd location; the 335 and the Ibanez have two, in the standard bridge and neck positions.

I've likely not answered your question, but I still am not quite sure what sound you are seeking. I know that when I want the sound of an acoustic guitar, I play an acoustic. When I just want the "feel" of an unplugged hollowbody, then I have my choice. But they don't equal the sound of a pure acoustic.

I started playing unplugged in consideration of my wife, and discovered that I actually preferred it. I don't have the vocabulary to describe it; it just feels right. What sound am I seeking? Ideally, I suppose, a full-sized acoustic archtop sound from a thinline. Since that's not possible, just the "fullest," "richest," most "complex" sound a thinline can offer.

Sounds like you've found guitars that meet all your needs.

[nopedals]

Circa 1970 Guild CA100. Carved top and the rims are less than 3 inches IIRC. Most came with dearmonds. Not hard to find at 1500--1800 dollars. TBH the acoustic sound is not the best.