-
I've always lusted after these old archtop guitars. Well, I'm a lucky man. My wife of f..., let's just say many years wants to surprise me with an archtop for Christmas. After a bit of searching she came to the conclusion that she had no idea what I wanted, so she told me the surprise as basically, 'find one you like'. It was the wise decision since I don't even know what I want. And the more I look, the worse it gets. Anyhow, here are my initial thoughts.
First, although I've been playing on and off for 50+ years, I still pretty much suck. But that's OK. I play fingerstyle exclusively. Haven't held a plectrum (love that word) in 40 years. I've learned and forgotten hundreds of songs but that list includes pop, rock, jazz, blues, classical, etc. My main two guitars are a '94 Breedlove C1-M and a nice little rosewood Larrivee parlor. If you are familiar with those two guitars, you are probably scratching your heads wondering what my preferred sound profile would be. I just like something that is well-balanced, not real tinny or overly boomy. I need a relatively small or thin body because of an old shoulder injury. I like fairly low action, prefer 1 3/4" nut, don't care about amplification. Basically, something that I will enjoy playing with a pleasant sound.
Part of me is drawn to the old L5's. (I am a woodworker and love the patina of old woods...not wanting to get into the argument of the sound difference). I just love the look of those old archtops. Due to my shoulder, perhaps a 30's build to get the 16", but how playable are these? Maybe pre-war isn't the best approach, Maybe a used Benedetto or perhaps an L5 CT (George Gobel model) that is a bit thinner...but then I lose 1/16" at the nut. Analysis paralysis. I have a healthy budget, say $10k. In summary, I am looking for something with good playability that sounds nice, looks great and, ideally, is not a terrible investment.
Thanks
Thoughts?
-
11-16-2019 10:58 AM
-
Well I would recommend staying with Gibson for sure otherwise you just never know what will happen. I see a beautiful Campellone on Reverb for $6000 but and 18 inch guitar that would be a killer and probably the only non Gibson I would consider. Otherwise you have an L5 and the market is good for buyers but again you might just only want a 16 inch guitar. But just to fair, the best that is not a terrible investment is going be and L5. The food chain starts there basically and is downhill from that point. The exceptions would be not something I would recommend and then they get expensive but you have a nice budget.
-
Hey, ya ol' goat! Welcome to the Forum!
Many of us here will envy someone with a long marriage, and a spouse allowing a $10K budget for a guitar -- congrats on your life!!
The good and bad of your situation: there are too many options!!! New, used, custom/boutique -- with that budget and those specs, the sky's the limit!
We're not sure where you live, so you may or may not get to play many guitars before buying; if you can't, are you comfortable buying a nice guitar online?
Steve Holst can build whatever you want, probably for half your budget! Give him a call!
For people with shoulder/back injuries/pains, a serious consideration would be an "ergonomic" guitar -- not for strict "traditionalists" because they may look funny, but excellent for those with open minds and ears! Chris Forshage is in Texas, and has made some more "acoustic" models for people around here; I have a "hollowbody" version of his "Orion" model, but it's still designed for use with an amp. These are the most comfortable (for sitting) guitars you can buy!! Victor Baker and others make them, too. You'll have to wait a year or so to get one, but again, you'll get a comfortable guitar with whatever specs you like.
Happy hunting, and let us know what you find!
Marc
-
Originally Posted by deacon Mark
Thanks (Gotta add, when I saw your user name, I figured this has to be providence as I went to Wake and we are the Deacons )
-
Originally Posted by marcwhy
-
Fantasic acoustic sound (x-braced), has the 1-3/4” nut, slightly thinner body, highly desirable vintage Gibson, will hold value well, 10k budget, very reliable dealer:
1963 Gibson Johnny Smith Sunburst > Guitars Archtop Electric & Acoustic | Laurence Wexer Ltd.Last edited by fws6; 11-16-2019 at 03:08 PM.
-
Originally Posted by marcwhy
-
There is a used 16” Campellone Deluxe thinline at Rudy’s in NYC that is about the nicest guitar I have ever played. The playability and sound is just magnificent. And, of course, it is beautiful. It doesn’t look old (it isn’t), but it’s a very fine guitar. If I could have any guitar I wanted right now, it would be that one. I’m only sharing this because it’s not in the cards for me.
-
Originally Posted by Mark M.
-
My '34 L-7 is a super player. Not exactly gorgeous, but kinda what you might expect from a wrinkley 86 year old.
These old guitars can play great -- at least some of them. BTW, mine was less than $3K.
I was lucky enough to find mine in a local shop on consignment.
If you can get some guitars in your hands that will be way more informative than surfing the web.
Also, I gotta say -- I played a little Larivee parlor guitar a few years ago. It was just super. I still think about it
-
Originally Posted by Oldgoat
2013 Gibson L5 Wes Montgomery | Christopher's Gear | Reverb
-
Here's a '30's L-7 for sale by a forum member. I've played it and it's a really sweet guitar in great shape for its vintage. If I didn't have a '36 on layaway I would seriously consider trying to purchase this one. I bought a '38 Epiphone Broadway from the seller a couple of years ago and I can highly recommend him as can others on this site and through his Reverb shop.
1934 Gibson L7 $4500 plus shipping
-
If I was looking for a mostly acoustic instrument with that kind of budget I'd find a way to weasel out a 10% finders fee. And by that I mean a trip to the big city so I could find the right one for me. Especially if I was interested in the smaller and older L guitars. Don't overlook L-4, 7, 10 and 12, and keep an eye out for Epi. A 16 inch L5 can blow the budget with ease.
I don't have as much experience with different archtops as a lot of folks here, but there's a BIG difference in the acoustic tone of the two I own. It's such a personal choice, and it varies between instruments of same make, model and vintage. Like who carved it and how was he feeling that day in 1935.
And how are you going to be able to really know how it feels in your lap? Not to mention neck and nut varieties. You may actually prefer a more modern 17, which really opens the flood gates of options. Like the Johnny Smith mentioned before. Who doesn't want to check that out?
Edit: Just saw Marks post. Personally, I'd buy that L7 in a heartbeat if I had the scratch.Last edited by ccroft; 11-16-2019 at 04:36 PM. Reason: looked at Omph's L7 again
-
Thanks...while I think I'd rather have something that is vintage, this is a beautiful instrument and definitely worthy of consideration...added it to my watch list. (I am partial to the sunburst and natural finishes.)
Thanks
-
Originally Posted by marcut
-
Originally Posted by ccroft
-
Originally Posted by marcut
thanks
-
$10 000 is a crazy budget! I'd look at handmades from Bill Comins, Mark Campellone et alia.
Joseph Yanuziello makes a copy of the 1929 16" Gibson L5. I am not necessarily recommending this exact one but take a look: Yanuziello Elle-5 (2014) .
You may contact Joe Yanuziello to order one with your desired 1.75" nut width. I asked Joseph for a quote in 2013 and he quoted $12 500 for one custom made for me. I don't know what it is today.
Jackson Cunningham, Andrew Mowry can make you their interpretation of the 1923-1929 Gibson 16" L5. Jackson was quoting $8500, Mowry was quoting $6500 a few years ago.
Collings has the AT-16. That one is hard to come by and when it does, the owner asks a very high price for it. I feel that it is hyped beyond its worth as a guitar.
Guitars like that are pretty much lifers. I don't think you are one to consider resale so you may as well go for it. Hee! Hee!
-
Hey Goat. This "previously sold" area holds a lot of info on different makes and models, including bout size, depth, weight and so on. It's been an awesome educational resource (and time waster) for me. Like if you want to compare a '47 to a '34.
Just in case you didn't seen it yet: archtop.com: Previously Sold Instruments
-
@ the OP, I think you need to define "relatively thin or small body". Those are different things and any given specs will mean different things to different people. I probably associate those words with max depth of 2.5" deep and max bout width of 16" or 16.5".
It's not a traditional looking guitar, but the Collins CL Jazz would fit the bill. I have the laminate version Eastside Jazz which is the same size but with a shorter 24 7/8" scale vs. 25.5" on the CL Jazz. The laminate has a huge and pleasing acoustic tone - totally shocking for the size - and I'm sure the carved/solid/longer scale version would be a significant step up. I doubt you'd find a more comfortable archtop than that (15" x 1 11/16" deep). I play my Eastside Jazz a lot now, all while standing up, and it's so much more comfortable than my 16" x 2 7/8" archtop which it sort of replaced.
Also, pretty decent resale on the CL Jazz.
-
Originally Posted by ccroft
-
First question is whether you're looking for a primarily acoustic or electric instrument. That will guide you quickly towards or away from specific instruments and reduce the confusion of the field of search. If you want a primarily acoustic instrument, the field narrows much more quickly- among Gibsons mainly the older L-5, consider the L-4 (16" guitar that superficially resembles the ES-175), the venerable L-7. Note CES designations are primarily electric guitars. If you want a primarily electric instrument, then there's a surfeit of choice. Consider the Johnny Smith among Gibsons; it straddles the electric versus acoustic divide.
Second question is size; sounds like you will want a smaller bodied (17" or less, maybe less than 3" at the rims) instrument. A Byrdland? Among Gibsons, look for the T designation for thinner guitars that fit under the right arm easily.
Third question is vintage versus modern.
-
Originally Posted by Jabberwocky
There are a lot of great luthiers out there; however, I'm really not wanting a custom build.
-
Originally Posted by Cunamara
-
Originally Posted by Oldgoat
On forum, when it comes to players it seems to be they're pretty much the same guitar in a given era.... most of the time. L7 is less bling and rosewood board instead of ebony. This can matter some people's ears. And the tail-piece.
Maybe not as simple as you'd think it'd be. Just remembered this in case you didn't find it: Gibson L7 vs L12 Vs L5? Differences?
RIP Nick Gravenites
Today, 05:48 PM in The Players