The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Posts 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    I've gone through a few full size archtops this year and have come to accept that they're just too big for me. I'm wondering if there are any smaller body, shorter scale guitars that are decent and reasonably affordable, i.e. under $3K. I've seen a few that are 24-3/4" scale, but would prefer 25" if they exist.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    Modern Benedetto's are all 25" scale, and the Bravo model is 16" x 2.5". It will be over $3K but if you hold out for a used one you can probably find one that's not too much more than $3K especially if you accept that you won't buy one that's dead mint.

  4. #3

    User Info Menu

    A bang-for-the-buck option would be an Eastman ar403, its discontinued but there are still some NOS examples out there well under $1K. Some people find this model compares favorably to much more expensive instruments, others will disagree.

  5. #4

    User Info Menu

    The Eastman T146 is a nice guitar, 1.75" in depth, 16" wide, with a carved spruce top. I have a T145 which is 15", and I like it a lot. I've been playing it more than my Benedettos lately. The cheapest Benedetto available is the Bambino, a laminate 14.5", 2.5" with two pickups, no f holes. It's very nice guitar, and available used for ~$2k. The Eastman can be had in the $1k range, used. I'm not sure if it's still in production.

  6. #5

    User Info Menu

    The Sadowsky SS-15 comes to mind. Might be of 24.75" Scale Length.

    The Benedetto Bambino is another one that you could consider. 25" SL in a Les Paul sized body. You can find used with some marks of careful stewardship $2500 and under. With some luck you can find a Bambino Deluxe under $2850, especially in a funky colour like Aquamarine.

    There is Victor Baker in NYC whose 14" jazzboxes almost define his oeuvre. If you can find them used, they will be under $3000.

    If you are patient, you can order a Roger Borys Jazz Solid. Roger's fave SL is 25". The Borys has a core that is riddled with holes.

    The Comins GCS-1 is $1495 new. Get the version with a spruce top!

  7. #6

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Jabberwocky
    The Sadowsky SS-15 comes to mind. Might be of 24.75" Scale Length.
    Yes, SS=Short Scale=24.75.

  8. #7

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by coolvinny
    Modern Benedetto's are all 25" scale, and the Bravo model is 16" x 2.5". It will be over $3K but if you hold out for a used one you can probably find one that's not too much more than $3K especially if you accept that you won't buy one that's dead mint.
    Don't take it the wrong way but I could get a Heritage Sweet 16 for that – solid spruce, flamed maple, ebony board. Only snag is 25-1/2" scale.

    Quote Originally Posted by ugarte
    A bang-for-the-buck option would be an Eastman ar403, its discontinued but there are still some NOS examples out there well under $1K. Some people find this model compares favorably to much more expensive instruments, others will disagree.
    Yes, I've seen a few. I've heard they're reasonably well made, especially for the price.

    Quote Originally Posted by sgosnell
    The Eastman T146 is a nice guitar, 1.75" in depth, 16" wide, with a carved spruce top. I have a T145 which is 15", and I like it a lot. I've been playing it more than my Benedettos lately. The cheapest Benedetto available is the Bambino, a laminate 14.5", 2.5" with two pickups, no f holes. It's very nice guitar, and available used for ~$2k. The Eastman can be had in the $1k range, used. I'm not sure if it's still in production.
    I've seen a T146 for around $1k. Maybe a little too thin?

  9. #8

    User Info Menu

    Eastman El Rey 4:
    25" scale
    16" bout
    2.25" at the rims
    Full hollow
    Set-in humbucker

    Fun guitar!

  10. #9

    User Info Menu

    How about a Heritage H-575? They're 24.75 scale, however, and only 1/4" off your specs.

    Guitar Type Archtop Hollow Body
    Lower Bout Width 16
    Body Depth 2.75
    Nut Width 1.6875
    Fingerboard Scale 24.75
    Pickup Type 2 Set Humbucker
    Wood Composition Solid
    Tonewoods Maple
    Fretboard Rosewood
    Bridge Floating

  11. #10

    User Info Menu

    Too thin is entirely subjective. Only you can decide that. But my T145 is very loud acoustically for a thinline, truly as loud as my flat-tops. Not the same tone, being an archtop, and a thinline, but for me it's just about the right thickness. YMMV.

  12. #11

    User Info Menu

    I recommend a Hofner Jazzica - it has wedge-shaped rims that make it quite comfortable under the arm. 25 1/4" scale, 24 frets, 15 7/8" wide, carved spruce top, laminated anigre rims and back, maple neck, ebony board w/mother-of pearl blocks. There are some for sale on this board, all under your budget. Like this one :
    Hofner Jazzica, New, Custom Shop

  13. #12

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Sherry
    Eastman El Rey 4:
    25" scale
    16" bout
    2.25" at the rims
    Full hollow
    Set-in humbucker

    Fun guitar!
    I read your extensive post about the ER-4. I just can't get past the appearance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitfiddler
    How about a Heritage H-575? They're 24.75 scale, however, and only 1/4" off your specs.

    Guitar Type Archtop Hollow Body
    Lower Bout Width 16
    Body Depth 2.75
    Nut Width 1.6875
    Fingerboard Scale 24.75
    Pickup Type 2 Set Humbucker
    Wood Composition Solid
    Tonewoods Maple
    Fretboard Rosewood
    Bridge Floating
    I have a 24-3/4" Gibson solid body. It's a little tight for playing jazz. I know there's not a lot of difference between 24-3/4" and 25" but remember that all of us can detect .001" difference on a string. So I'd like that little extra spacing.

  14. #13

    User Info Menu

    Are you focusing on scale length or body size? These are really different things. If you think a 24.75" scale is too tight, it's hard to imagine that a 25.5" scale length is literally at the other extreme for you, i.e. too long. Perhaps you should be focusing more on the physical attributes of rim depth and bout width as factors in your quest. What sort of guitars did you own before and what was the problem with them?

  15. #14

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by buduranus2
    I have a 24-3/4" Gibson solid body. It's a little tight for playing jazz. I know there's not a lot of difference between 24-3/4" and 25" but remember that all of us can detect .001" difference on a string. So I'd like that little extra spacing.
    IMHO, accepting scale lenght is a matter of getting used to it. As for being "too tight for jazz playing", a Gibson has 24.75" scale length and is THE archetypical jazz guitar. Wes Montgomery, who had big hands, is best known for his L5 guitars, but he used guitars with 24.75" scale length a lot in the earlier days. I have guitars with both 24.75", 25"and 25.5" scale length and can switch between them without noticing any significant difference.

    The perfect guitar doesn't exist. A search for that can go on and on for the rest of your life - unsuccesfully. What we can do is attempt to bend the instrument at hand to our will. Find a guitar in good shape with body dimensions being comfortable to you and then get used to whatever scale length it may have in the 24.75" - 25.5" ballpark.

  16. #15

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by oldane
    ...The perfect guitar doesn't exist. A search for that can go on and on for the rest of your life - unsuccesfully. ... Find a guitar in good shape with body dimensions being comfortable to you and then get used to whatever scale length it may have in the 24.75" - 25.5" ballpark.
    The perfect guitar doesn't exist, but the perfect scale length is 25 1/4", of course. All the cool kids know that. Coincidentally, I have a guitar for sale on this forum with that very scale length....

  17. #16

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by rpguitar
    Are you focusing on scale length or body size? These are really different things. If you think a 24.75" scale is too tight, it's hard to imagine that a 25.5" scale length is literally at the other extreme for you, i.e. too long. Perhaps you should be focusing more on the physical attributes of rim depth and bout width as factors in your quest. What sort of guitars did you own before and what was the problem with them?
    First I had a D'Angelico EXL-1 just to get my feet wet. The neck was chunky, which I somehow didn't mind, but I couldn't quite make the stretches at the lower end of the neck. Then I had a Triggs San Salvador that was great, but the neck felt narrow to me somehow, even though the width at the nut was 1-11/16". Lastly I had a D'Angelico NYL-2 that had a great neck, but, again, couldn't cleanly play diminished arpeggios at the low end of the neck. So now I'm back to the EXL-1 until I find something more suitable. I have a Gibson Firebird solid body that's 24-3/4" but somehow my pudgy fingers get squished playing chords, lots of clams (prefer in a white sauce with linguini.)

    Quote Originally Posted by oldane
    IMHO, accepting scale lenght is a matter of getting used to it. As for being "too tight for jazz playing", a Gibson has 24.75" scale length and is THE archetypical jazz guitar. Wes Montgomery, who had big hands, is best known for his L5 guitars, but he used guitars with 24.75" scale length a lot in the earlier days. I have guitars with both 24.75", 25"and 25.5" scale length and can switch between them without noticing any significant difference.

    The perfect guitar doesn't exist. A search for that can go on and on for the rest of your life - unsuccesfully. What we can do is attempt to bend the instrument at hand to our will. Find a guitar in good shape with body dimensions being comfortable to you and then get used to whatever scale length it may have in the 24.75" - 25.5" ballpark.
    I'm sure Wes could make a broomstick and baling wire sound like diamonds. For that matter, Jimi's hands were ungodly huge. Well, size isn't everything, so they say. I'm just dealing with my own limitations trying to find something comfortable for me. I think you're correct that focusing only on one aspect, i.e. scale length, may not be the best approach. Maybe it's a combination of a 17" body with 3" depth as well as the scale length, or maybe a smaller body would be more comfortable for me. (Probably so.) As for "the perfect guitar" I'm not one to hold good enough hostage to perfection. That said, we've all gone through a boatload of guitars in our lifetimes, so we must be looking for something. Or maybe what we're looking for evolves over time.

  18. #17

    User Info Menu

    These 2 Eastman's seem to tick all your boxes:

    AR580CE - Eastman Guitars

    AR503CE - Eastman Guitars

    I recently picked up a T146SM and really like it. A high quality guitar.

  19. #18

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by D.G.
    These 2 Eastman's seem to tick all your boxes:

    AR580CE - Eastman Guitars

    AR503CE - Eastman Guitars

    I recently picked up a T146SM and really like it. A high quality guitar.
    They look nice. Are they poly or nitro?

  20. #19

    User Info Menu

    PRS JA-15 Paul Jackson Jr. is another consideration...

    Body size at lower bout: 15" Scale length: 25 " Nut Width: 1 11/16" Body depth at rim: 2 5/8"

    2008 PRS SC-J Thinline Limited Edition


  21. #20

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by buduranus2
    Don't take it the wrong way but I could get a Heritage Sweet 16 for that – solid spruce, flamed maple, ebony board. Only snag is 25-1/2" scale.
    Sure, you could, but don't assume that the Heritage would be "better". Laminate vs. solid is a debate that will rage on forever.

  22. #21

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by buduranus2
    They look nice. Are they poly or nitro?
    According to the info in the links, nitro

    As far as I know, Eastman's are always nitro. A caveat, they scratch if you look at 'em funny!

  23. #22

    User Info Menu

    Eastman uses a thin nitro finish that lets the acoustic sound come through. It does scratch somewhat easily, but there ain't no free lunch.

  24. #23

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Gitfiddler
    PRS JA-15 Paul Jackson Jr. is another consideration...
    Body size at lower bout: 15" Scale length: 25 " Nut Width: 1 11/16" Body depth at rim: 2 5/8"
    2008 PRS SC-J Thinline Limited Edition
    A little pricey from what I can tell. Also, not looking for a stop tailpiece.

    Quote Originally Posted by coolvinny
    Sure, you could, but don't assume that the Heritage would be "better". Laminate vs. solid is a debate that will rage on forever.
    Hmmm. Seems as if a solid top would be better acoustically, maybe a little hard to control amplified. Am I missing something? I see Tal Farlows all over the place for $3k. It's a custom shop instrument too. Perplexing.

    Quote Originally Posted by D.G.
    According to the info in the links, nitro
    As far as I know, Eastman's are always nitro. A caveat, they scratch if you look at 'em funny!
    The voice of experience. Will definitely keep that in mind.

  25. #24

    User Info Menu

    25” scale “roughly” 3” deep, their description not mine

    PRS Guitars Private Stock Singlecut Archtop

  26. #25

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by TedBPhx
    25” scale “roughly” 3” deep, their description not mine

    PRS Guitars Private Stock Singlecut Archtop
    Gee, if I had that kind of money I could have Jim Triggs build me a 16" D'Angelico New Yorker.