The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Posts 26 to 41 of 41
  1. #26

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchtopHeaven
    Well then how come I've got a pre CBS 1929 model?
    Pics please.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #27

    User Info Menu

    Thank you for the kind words everyone. I'll try and answer all the questions

    Mic'ing was the same on every guitar!

    Amp used was as a BF Princeton Reverb - same setting for everything. I was playing with the guitar's volume and tone controls a LOT though. I never use full volume on archtops. Not quite sure why the BK sounds so much more acoustic than the ES-175 - they were about the same in person!

    My favorite? I really found them all too different to compare and feel like I'll instantly regret naming one guitar as I will have changed my mind by tomorrow...

    Thank you again for the kind words!
    Last edited by jamieh; 02-18-2016 at 04:50 PM.

  4. #28

    User Info Menu

    Nice demo, Jamie, thank you. And some really nice playing too! I'd love to have any of them.

  5. #29
    icr
    icr is offline

    User Info Menu

    If the date of a guitar is known, its date should be stated rather than nondescript nomenclature; old, vintage, antique, senescent, superannuated etc.

  6. #30

    User Info Menu

    Thanks, me too!!!

  7. #31

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Moominpapa
    I'm another who liked the sounds of the ES 175 and ES 330 the best. The 175 in particular was just gorgeous.
    +1

  8. #32

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by jamieh

    Amp used was as a BF Princeton Reverb - same setting for everything. I was playing with the guitar's volume and tone controls a LOT though. I never use full volume on archtops. Not quite sure why the BK sounds so much more acoustic than the ES-175 - they were about the same in person!
    Just intuitively, I would suggest that it's a result of the longer scale length on the BK.

  9. #33

    User Info Menu

    I just listened to these. The 175 and the 330 are the ones that worked best for me as well.

    Listening to the clips, I am reminded that every guitar sounds different, even two of the same model from the same maker. I liked the 347 WAY better than the 335. In general, I have preferred 335's to their more upscale brothers (345, 347 and 355) as I feel the rosewood fretboard makes them warmer (and better for jazz). In this test, the 347 was warmer and thicker.

    Once again, I am convinced that it is best to play a guitar before buying it.

    Tasty playing on the clips BTW

    PS Before anyone goes out hunting a 1965 ES-175, know this: That was the year that Gibson started shrinking the nut. Some 65's have a full size nut and some have a 1 5/8 nut (which I find quite playable, but others may find too narrow). 65's should have non-T-Top Patent sticker PUPS, which are identical to late PAF PUPs and are therefore very valuable, so beware of changed pickups if you are buying one of these. It is not possible to tell without removing the covers so knowing the provenance of the guitar is most helpful to prevent being taken advantage of.

  10. #34

    User Info Menu

    Yeah nice Comparison, thanks.

    You are writing that you never play with full volume on archtops, how come?

    Cheers

  11. #35

    User Info Menu

    Hi guys, here are a few more.... hope you enjoy them!






  12. #36

    User Info Menu

    And some more!








  13. #37

    User Info Menu

    345's have rosewood fingerboards.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stringswinger
    I just listened to these. The 175 and the 330 are the ones that worked best for me as well.

    Listening to the clips, I am reminded that every guitar sounds different, even two of the same model from the same maker. I liked the 347 WAY better than the 335. In general, I have preferred 335's to their more upscale brothers (345, 347 and 355) as I feel the rosewood fretboard makes them warmer (and better for jazz). In this test, the 347 was warmer and thicker.

    Once again, I am convinced that it is best to play a guitar before buying it.

    Tasty playing on the clips BTW

    PS Before anyone goes out hunting a 1965 ES-175, know this: That was the year that Gibson started shrinking the nut. Some 65's have a full size nut and some have a 1 5/8 nut (which I find quite playable, but others may find too narrow). 65's should have non-T-Top Patent sticker PUPS, which are identical to late PAF PUPs and are therefore very valuable, so beware of changed pickups if you are buying one of these. It is not possible to tell without removing the covers so knowing the provenance of the guitar is most helpful to prevent being taken advantage of.

  14. #38

    User Info Menu

    Thanks for the videos. Amazing playing!

  15. #39

    User Info Menu

    Throughout the videos, the ES-175 seemed to be the best. The sound was warm, full and still clear. I used to have an ES-175CC and it was one of the best guitars I ever had. It had the 1 11/16" wide, 24 3/4" long scale and was very easy to play. Great playing Jamie.

  16. #40

    User Info Menu

    Thanks for the kind words guys. My fave was the '68 - it had some flats on it and chord voicings just flew around the neck with minimal effort.

    I still have a soft spot for 125's though - they always sound so atriculate!

    Last one I think!


  17. #41

    User Info Menu

    I'd take either one of the 175s !