The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Posts 76 to 100 of 118
  1. #76

    User Info Menu

    To clarify, I shone the light under the floating pickup - parallel with and toward the neck. This allowed me to see the width of the piece of wood to which the pickup is attached.

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    I was referring to this:


    I can't really imagine how you could see they run the entire width other than that the light could pass between the extension and neck. Could be just along a very shallow groove where the 2 pieces don't align perfectly of course.

    I do not get the impression that the entire neck extension is floating on these guitars, btw, the part holding the pickup might but the rest seems to sit really flush to the top.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #77

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by mr. beaumont

    i think it'd be interesting to hear a Loar vs. a 1930's L5. That's an actual comparison.
    And all these years later I still haven't seen/ heard a direct comparison!!
    It's a Loar 700 vs L5 that interests me in paticular.

  4. #78

    User Info Menu

    An update to this thread. I was lucky to find a brand new Loar LH650. How this guitar was never sold from over 12 years ago when the company stopped making them is beyond my understanding.

    But I’m grateful to have it. I finally decided to attempt to do a setup on it. I’ve adjusted the action on the guitar to my liking, and now the action is low, even with 0.14 Bebop Rounds. The neck doesn’t possess the dreaded issue of so many of these guitars. It’s absolutely perfect.

    For a $1k investment, I’m as happy as a kid in a candy store.

    Loar LH-650-img_2908-jpegLoar LH-650-img_2910-png

  5. #79

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
    An update to this thread. I was lucky to find a brand new Loar LH650. How this guitar was never sold from over 12 years ago when the company stopped making them is beyond my understanding.

    But I’m grateful to have it. I finally decided to attempt to do a setup on it. I’ve adjusted the action on the guitar to my liking, and now the action is low, even with 0.14 Bebop Rounds. The neck doesn’t possess the dreaded issue of so many of these guitars. It’s absolutely perfect.

    For a $1k investment, I’m as happy as a kid in a candy store.

    Loar LH-650-img_2908-jpegLoar LH-650-img_2910-png
    Lovely guitar. You could try Martin Monels but they only go up to 13s. Nice strings nonetheless.

  6. #80

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    Lovely guitar. You could try Martin Monels but they only go up to 13s. Nice strings nonetheless.
    Are those Bronze strings?

  7. #81

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
    Are those Bronze strings?
    No but they are supposedly a good compromise to use on a 'proper' acoustic archtop with a pickup. I think monel is the material used. Jonathan Stout has mentioned them as a good choice in his blogs.

  8. #82

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    No but they are supposedly a good compromise to use on a 'proper' acoustic archtop with a pickup. I think monel is the material used. Jonathan Stout has mentioned them as a good choice in his blogs.
    Thx Gary, I’ll check into them immediately!

  9. #83

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    I think monel is the material used.
    Well, yes, Martin Monels are actually called Retros but Monel is indeed what they're wrapped with.

    If retro-suitability is a real issue there are better choices that use a round core wire. They're an acquired taste; on my own LH650 I found they made the bass response nearly (inexistent after the initial attack) to the listener/microphone (while as a player I thought it was there).

  10. #84

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    Well, yes, Martin Monels are actually called Retros but Monel is indeed what they're wrapped with.

    If retro-suitability is a real issue there are better choices that use a round core wire. They're an acquired taste; on my own LH650 I found they made the bass response nearly (inexistent after the initial attack) to the listener/microphone (while as a player I thought it was there).
    They are so much better on my Loar 700 than the TI rounds that were on it when I got it. Of course there's scope for experimentation and possible improvement. What specifically of the round core options would you suggest at my next string change? I'd like to stick to the same string tensions achieved by the Monel 13s. ps I don't want the issues with string balance that can occur with some strings when going from acoustic to electric.

  11. #85

    User Info Menu

    I heard only good things about the Curt Mangan monel strings and to the best of my knowledge those are round-cores.

    Personally I use brass-wounds for the lowest 2 strings and PB-wounds for the D and G, but I only play acoustic.

  12. #86

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    Personally I use brass-wounds for the lowest 2 strings and PB-wounds for the D and G, but I only play acoustic.
    There's the rub if you also use the guitar plugged in.

  13. #87

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    I heard only good things about the Curt Mangan monel strings and to the best of my knowledge those are round-cores.
    So being monel as well it's round vs hex. I've never heard of Curt Mangan so I'll check him out. Sounds expensive and not available in the UK. Just guessing though! Thanks for the recommendation. Edit. I see they are available in UK! Slightly more expensive here than the martins but I'll give them a try. Cheers.

  14. #88

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    There's the rub if you also use the guitar plugged in.
    Only to a tuner ^^

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    Sounds expensive and not available in the UK.
    Well, if you're in the UK (I didn't realise that!) you can also check out Newtone strings of course!

  15. #89

    User Info Menu

    I’ve been exclusively using Thomastik Infeld strings for over 10 years. But I’ve an open mind. I’m giving these Martin Monel Retros a try.

  16. #90

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
    I’ve been exclusively using Thomastik Infeld strings for over 10 years. But I’ve an open mind. I’m giving these Martin Monel Retros a try.
    I have the TIs on my L5CES. They're great for that. I treat that guitar as more of an electric.

  17. #91

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    Well, if you're in the UK (I didn't realise that!) you can also check out Newtone strings of course!
    As quickly as I could I edited my post having found them in the UK. I followed that up with saying I'd try them at my next string change regardless of the higher price than the Martins.

  18. #92

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RJVB
    Well, if you're in the UK (I didn't realise that!) you can also check out Newtone strings of course!
    Checking out the Mangans round core monels, they are about twice the price of Martins monels.
    The Newtone round core monels are just slightly more than the Martin's so I might give them a try first.
    BTW I see Mangan do a hex monel as well. How do they compare to the others?

  19. #93

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    BTW I see Mangan do a hex monel as well. How do they compare to the others?
    If you're asking me, I really can't tell as I've never tried either. I'd guess that the usual differences between hex and round core wires apply; there must be comparison videos on YT.

    I forgot to mention that Pyramid also make monel-wounds, and they must be round-cores. Both they and Newtone will do custom sets and strings if you fancy that, and don't even charge (much) for it.

  20. #94

    User Info Menu

    I've had the Martin Monels on my L-5 copy for awhile now. To be honest I don't love the way they feel but I'd guess they're period correct in terms of feel and tension. They do sound good though, especially if you're running into a tube amp and have it loud enough to get a little hair on the tone.

    I'm going to put TI flats on next string change just because I've never had them on this guitar.

  21. #95

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by olejason
    I've had the Martin Monels on my L-5 copy for awhile now. To be honest I don't love the way they feel but I'd guess they're period correct in terms of feel and tension. They do sound good though, especially if you're running into a tube amp and have it loud enough to get a little hair on the tone.

    I'm going to put TI flats on next string change just because I've never had them on this guitar.
    What brand L5 copy is it?
    I use MMs on a fully carved Loar which has a neck mount pickup

  22. #96

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    What brand L5 copy is it?
    I use MMs on a fully carved Loar which has a neck mount pickup
    Which Loar, an LH600?

  23. #97

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
    Which Loar, an LH600?
    My Loar is the LH700.
    Which brand is your L5 copy to which you refer please?

  24. #98

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    My Loar is the LH700.Which brand is your L5 copy to which you refer please?
    olejason has the L5 copy.

    So, I installed the Martin Monel’s today. I’m using the 13 medium lights. Surprisingly there’s a bit more volume than I had with the TI Bebop 14’s.

    I’m very used to the wind on the Bebop rounds, so the wind on the MM’s are so similar that it takes no effort getting used to them.

    And they’re the 3rd of the price for the Bebop Rounds so there’s that!

    It’s a great string for an acoustic archtop. Thanks for the recommendation!!!

  25. #99

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
    olejason has the L5 copy.

    So, I installed the Martin Monel’s today. I’m using the 13 medium lights. Surprisingly there’s a bit more volume than I had with the TI Bebop 14’s.

    I’m very used to the wind on the Bebop rounds, so the wind on the MM’s are so similar that it takes no effort getting used to them.

    And they’re the 3rd of the price for the Bebop Rounds so there’s that!

    It’s a great string for an acoustic archtop. Thanks for the recommendation!!!
    Sorry, I'm loosing it (or already lost it).
    I'm probably going to try Newtone round cores next, but I'm really happy with the MM13s.

  26. #100

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by garybaldy
    What brand L5 copy is it?
    I use MMs on a fully carved Loar which has a neck mount pickup
    It's a Stringphonic Lang w/ a CC