-
My tentative conclusion here has been that too many different questions would need to be disentangled for a useful discussion to get started. Just a few examples, from my point of view:
Originally Posted by Maroonblazer
(1) An application domain like diagnostic pattern recognition in medical imaging is hard to argue with. No reasonable person would do that.
(BUT you also need to deal with "automation complacency" - a psychological phenomenon with fatal consequences to which, however, we are all susceptible.)
(2) Also, as I have said already, it appears totally plausible to me that reasonable interaction with LLMs should be capable of producing good results.
(BUT the same can be said of social media. Remember overly optimistic discussions about Twitter like 15 years ago? Increasingly widespread use is not necessarily increasingly reasonable use.)
(3) Yes, you can conjure up some impressive images by generative AI in no time at all, which, no doubt, has useful applications.
(BUT the weekly takes on Homo habilis or neanderthalensis in Youtube videos make me sick; also the ghastly hyperrealistic garbage on history channels.)
etc. etc.
-
12-30-2024 11:55 AM
-
It’s refreshing that as far as I can see no one on this thread takes either of these positions.
Originally Posted by Maroonblazer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
This thread started with the best of intentions, looking at recommendations for guitars created by ChatGPT in English, but was diverted into an argument about coding, which is another matter entirely. An application's ability to debug software says nothing about its usefulness for creating information in a natural language.
-
I'll be OK with LLM AI as long as it can finally solve the Y2K crisis.
-
To answer the question, why ask a forum member- because we're all fellow jazz guitarists seeking to communicate with and relate to other human beings, even if only virtually?
Because we're creative artists sharing our uniquely gathered insights?
I just finished reading "Feeding the Machine", written by Oxford researchers. They profile people and situations in the unseen underbelly that's building out AI. It's not pretty- from data annotators in Africa, Amazon workers, on up the chain to data centers, machine learning engineers, investors.
My fear is big corporations which run the economy and systems in our (developed) world will force us to use AI whether it works or not. It's already happening in a lot of ways.
-
Why ask a person? So the person can answer from their experience, and by sharing they can grow in knowledge as well. You also give the person the privilege of experiencing helping someone else.
I look at AI art and music and writing this way as well. Music and art and writing are about a person creating something and experiencing the creation process. Using AI takes out the person experiencing the creation in the moment and is about the end product.
I’m not against using AI as a tool, but let’s not just focus on the answer or the end product, but that we as humans can experience the process of creation and collaboration together.
Enjoy the process!
Paul
-
I apologize for disrupting the current stream of consciousness, but apparently I am unable to paste links. "Page 5, second item" referred to this document:
https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/upl...ture_of_AI.pdf
Originally Posted by palindrome
-
both o1 and claude failed miserably trying to understand this game i invented:
albert ayler, bunny berigan, charlie christian, dorothy donegan, eliane elias, frank foster, grant green, hampton hawes. continue that list
-
Any chance that's because Dorothy is in the list?
Originally Posted by djg
-
huh?
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
She seems a bit the odd person at least as far as I know the other names.
Originally Posted by djg
-
i see. Dorothy Donegan - Wikipedia
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
I know who she is. I have a recording of a performance of hers at Nick Vollenbrecht's jazz café in the late 80s or early 90s. A fun, swinging, uptempo series of boogie'ish medleys with some Gershwin thrown in, that she'd probably not improvised for quite some time already (including some jokes I've heard her crack on other recordings on YT).
-
any suggestions how to continue the row? no google allowed
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
Right, I hadn't even tried TBH, only looked at who was on the list, not the names themselves

And even if it doesn't have to be jazz musicians I'm coming up short with the next entry (but I can suggest one for the one after that).
-
i got ike isaacs, j j johnson (extra point) kurt knufke, lage lund, marcus miller and rn am drawing a blank for NN.
Originally Posted by RJVB
-
Ah, I actually could have found Ike Isaacs, and I had a Justin Johnson too. Didn't try to go beyond that.
Originally Posted by djg
-
All I can think of at the moment is a percussionist called Nippy Noya(!), I think he’s played with some jazz/fusion people, I have him on a record somewhere.
Originally Posted by djg
-
Also a guitarist called Nate Najar who I think posted occasionally on the old rec.music jazz guitar group, don’t know much about him though.
-
you're the man.
Originally Posted by grahambop
a buddy of mine played with nippy and i once bought an amp from nate.
-
"Nuge" Nugent
erm, he plays a 175 or something
-
Sonny Stitt
-
Byrdland,, not a 175, which does bring Billy Byrd to mind.....
Originally Posted by supersoul
-
that is not how it works. we are at OO.
Originally Posted by Stringswinger
-
That one might be tough.......
Originally Posted by djg



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos