-
Any thoughts on this? It *does* work, although I'm not sure how - heh.
A while back we talked a bit about the Buzz Feiten tuning system. I have a couple of guitars that are set up this way, and while I didn't, and still don't, fully understand the system, I do know that the intonation on those, one acoustic, the other a solid-body electric, is amazing. Just sweet all over, tuned well by ear, to a $12 tuner, whatever. In the earlier thread, someone made the good point of "How could a special nut possibly help with barre chords - or with jazz voicings, all the stuff that the nut can't affect once a barre finger goes down," or whatever.
Turns out it's the nut AND the saddle/bridge. And to properly intonate a "Feitenized" guitar, you need a Korg DT-7 tuner - about $99. And a speck of know-how, from the website.
Here's the canned copy (btw Washburn's high-end guitars are NOT the only ones coming standard with this. McPherson acoustics have it too - all of them. (Huge bucks for those.)
The canned copy:
The Buzz Feiten Tuning System is a tempered tuning formula, which uses a compensated nut and saddle to correct the inherent intonation problems of the Western tuning formula. The system that Buzz devised has been a godsend to guitarists. Fans of the system include Eddie Van Halen, Steve Vai, Joe Satriani, Liona Boyd and Andy Summers. The Buzz Feiten Tuning System is standard on all USA made Washburn guitars and basses and is featured on select imported models. Washburn is the only major guitar manufacturer to incorporate the system as a standard feature on production guitars.
[End of canned copy]
Just tune one of these and play a D major in cowboy position, then in a barre at the 5th fret - you'll begin to understand!
Thoughts, anybody?
-
06-06-2011 04:04 AM
-
I don't know anything... but I'm very interested...Reg
-
I've played a few guitars with the system. I can't say I've missed it on guitars that don't have it. The market is so small and it's been out so long, that perhaps it's just not needed.
-
I have a cheap Washburn acoustic I bought new a couple of years ago and I'm not sure it has this. In fact, I'm not really sure I get it. But, I'm interested. I'll have to go look. But what would I be looking for?
Last edited by paynow; 06-06-2011 at 12:39 PM. Reason: corrected a typo
-
Look for the compensated nut, paynow.
-
Originally Posted by Reg
Originally Posted by paynow
How It Works
paynow: on the back of the headstock, if a guitar has Buzz Feiten, there'll be a logo: a horizontal tuning fork with a lightning bolt across it, and the name printed there, too.
The page "How it Works" has just a few links to the left, and these topics are all really quick reads, and they explain it all, with pics, etc.
Granted, this thing isn't going to change the musical world, but if you can tune a guitar, you can't NOT hear the difference. Apple's new iPhone with the tuner built in has a Buzz Feiten mode. Lots of more affordable electronic tuners have it now, and almost all new strobe tuners have it. I think it's about $100 to have your guitar set up this way.
kj
-
Originally Posted by Kojo27
-
Originally Posted by paynow
Now, only the better models get this. The $700 - $1200 Idol series electrics, the acoustics in that price range and up, and all the USA Washburn electrics have it. One of their not-so-bad jazz boxes had it, or has it.
But I believe dear old Buzz changed his "vision" for his new business -- in other words, he made it too expensive.
-
Originally Posted by Kojo27
-
This is one of those marketing things where they should 'go for it'. It probably should be the standard. Put it on cheapos and great guitars. It's a design improvement on guitars.I know it looks like I'm contradicting myself, just really short posts. It's a subtle good idea REALLY noticeable to me at the third fret.
I know he owns the design but didn't Mosely do similar work, along with Warwick?
Why hasn't the idea taken hold?
-
Originally Posted by Billnc
otherwise, there are just too many guitars out there that would need undesirable surgery. thats too big a hassle for most folks.
-
Originally Posted by paynow
Hey-ho.
-
Originally Posted by Billnc
I don't know. Just guessing. Imagine, too, if someone was shopping for a guitar, liked the Washburn, but the sales person says, "Now, if you ever want to change string gauges or if the intonation gets screwy, you'll need to take it to an authorized Buzz Feiten repairman.... the closest one being 3 hours away..."
Actually, these scenarios *probably* wouldn't cause any problems that anyone would notice. But it you want your Buzz Feiten system back, you'd have to use their "shelf nut" and have your saddle/bridge adjusted with a Korg D-7 tuner. The usual way of matching the 12th fret harmonic to the 12th fret note doesn't work in this system. The process for setting BF intonation is super-simple, though. Just need that tuner.
(Oh yeah - I think those other guys did do similar stuff; not sure if they were affiliated with Buzz, but there were others doing this kind of thing.)Last edited by Kojo27; 06-07-2011 at 06:22 AM.
-
Works great, especially with light gauge strings.
-
Originally Posted by Kojo27
-
Originally Posted by John Link
So yeah, the guitars (especially the electrics, which have tune-o-matic Gibson-type bridges) are set for the strings that come on them.
I think this was one of the problems for Washburn, too. Right now, Buzz Feiten gives free training to guitar techs who want to be certified. I guess Buzz sees his fortune coming in "royalties" every time a tech sets up a guitar and uses one of his serial numbers and logos. He probably gets a few bucks. Who knows. (In my opinion, it's worth $100 for your main guitar. Look on their website for the tech nearest you.)
-
There's a long thread on thegearpage, mostly quite old now:
Different Temperaments than Buzz Feiten? Please post - The Gear Page
There's mixed feelings there, and I'm one of the "antis". Basically, a properly set-up guitar shouldn't need a BF system. If it improves your guitar, your guitar was wrongly set-up in the first place - probably the nut was too high (a very common fault), not in the wrong place.
When the nut is too high, fretting pressure tends to put the strings sharp on the low frets. So to keep fretted notes in tune, some players detune the open strings a little - on the principle that they'll be playing fretted notes more often than open strings.
There are two ways to correct this: (a) move the nut forward a little; (b) lower the nut so it's equivalent to fret height (which is where it should be anyway).
The bass strings tend to be affected more: hence the notion of compensating the nut, similar to the way bridge saddles are compensated (to lengthen the bass strings). But - as I say - with a properly set-up guitar, the nut should not need compensating. After all, the nut is only the same as a fret: a zero fret. Any adjustment of the nut back or forward makes no difference to barre chords or if you use a capo.
A luthier I know agrees the Feiten system is BS. A few others on the above thread also agree with me - although plenty of people seem to believe in it and claim to hear the difference (even when that difference is supposedly of the order of 1 or 2 cents). IMO, this is an emperor's-new-clothes scenario. It's not really scientific. (Most of the people arguing in favour of Feiten seem ignorant of the real science of string physics and intonation; and in some cases of the principle of temperament.)
If a particular guitar IS noticeably improved with a Feiten system, I'd bet it could have been improved far cheaper with a proper set-up.
-
Originally Posted by JonR
Perhaps you should copy your "anti" posts from the Gear Forum and from here, and send them to Eddie Van Halen (a superb guitar tech, btw), to Steve Vai, Liona Boyd, Joe Satriani, Scott Henderson, and to the hundreds of guitar techs around the world who install this all the time on the guitars of customers who pay $139 for it. Send your posts to Korg, Peterson, and the other manufacturers of digital and strobe tuners, and maybe they'll stop putting that Buzz Feiten mode in most of their better tuners -- why would they do this anyway, if the market isn't growing like mad every year?
Ever played a McPherson guitar? They're acoustic guitars, you know -- pricey -- they can afford to pay Buzz his royalties -- Washburn can't anymore. The price went way up, you see -- it's the supply and demand rule. Demand up, prices up. McPhersons come standard with Buzz Feiten. Check out this guitar:
McPherson 4.5XPH Flamed Redwood/Brazilian Rosewood #1744
Send your opinions to the McPherson Company, too. Explain their ignorance to them.
Any adjustment of the nut back or forward makes no difference to barre chords or if you use a capo.
Most of the people arguing in favour of Feiten seem ignorant of the real science of string physics and intonation; and in some cases of the principle of temperament.)
-
Originally Posted by Kojo27
Regarding that fact that "lots" of people like something and whether that validates it, I offer you Lady Gaga...
P.S.
I had the feiten system on a couple suhrs and thought it was hype. They played no more in tune than anything else. The sweetened peterson tuner option didn't do much for me either. Suhr doesn't offer feiten anymore. Is he doing something else?
Anyway, ted greene and Wes and Benson and Martino and Pass and Holdsworth and (on and on) seemed to do just fine with non feiten tuning.
-
Originally Posted by jzucker
Regarding that fact that "lots" of people like something and whether that validates it, I offer you Lady Gaga...
P.S.
I had the feiten system on a couple suhrs and thought it was hype. They played no more in tune than anything else. The sweetened peterson tuner option didn't do much for me either. Suhr doesn't offer feiten anymore. Is he doing something else?
I have an acoustic with BF, and the violin player with the hot legs, the one in my jam group, has perfect pitch -- not that this means a lot, I know; please, not another debate -- but she hears very well in other ways, too -- and she loves the "sweetened" Washburn. Says it sounds "prettier" than the other guitars. Whatever she says, I agree.
Anyway, ted greene and Wes and Benson and Martino and Pass and Holdsworth and (on and on) seemed to do just fine with non feiten tuning.Eddie Lang and Charlie Christian played round-wounds, so why start using some newfangled squeakless string?
-
Hey JonR --
I apologize if my response to your post came across as too snotty or offensive in any way -- I read a bunch of your posts on the Gear Forum and found them somewhat on the inflammatory and condescending side -- just being frank here -- and I suppose I rebounded more roughly than I should have.
My bad.
KJ
-
Originally Posted by Kojo27
I have an acoustic with BF, and the violin player with the hot legs, the one in my jam group, has perfect pitch -- not that this means a lot, I know; please, not another debate -- but she hears very well in other ways, too -- and she loves the "sweetened" Washburn. Says it sounds "prettier" than the other guitars. Whatever she says, I agree.
-
Tell me more about this lady violin player with the "hot legs".
-
Originally Posted by jzucker
Wow - cool, Jack. Good playing. I'm assuming that's your big ugly foot....
And yes - I was imagining lead lines and forgot all about chords (was already thinking about the fiddle player). I'd bet that even Buzz would admit that his system does little for 2nd intervals. Those always sound a little "wavy" to me, even on electronic pianos.
Well that settles it then.
-
Originally Posted by Space Pickle
And I have to say she's a heck of a fiddle player. Studied classical, but she's picking up Western swing really well.
Why do songbook melodies from the 40s sound so...
Today, 02:28 AM in The Songs