-
Yes. This is a very good example of playing in great time.
Originally Posted by ccroft
8's thinking and listening to each other makes it very clear playing.
The musicians have a very good sense of time and control each other.
A perfect duo.!
Often the saxophonist plays the 8th pulse which controls the whole.
When you try to tap your foot on 2 & 4 everything swings beautifully and flows beautifully.
Great stuff!
-
04-23-2023 01:20 AM
-
No they didn’t. They don’t need to.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
A strange way of reacting to the duo's excellent performance.
Originally Posted by ragman1
I do not understand this.
Such bland comments lower the level of this jazz guitar forum.sorry.
-
Ben Wendel has done a lot of these videos with other players, including several guitarists - Julian Lage, Lage Lund, Miles Okazaki, Gilad Hekselman.
Ben Wendel - Saxophonist / Composer - YouTube
I'd say some worked better than others. Personally, I didn't find the Mike Moreno one that terrific, possibly because he plays quite out a lot of the time.
And Graham, nothing personal, but to suggest they didn't need to consider what they were going to do before making the video sounds to me like complete nonsense. And I don't mean just choosing which tune to play!
-
May I ask you a question ?
Originally Posted by ragman1
What do you feel when you hear you play ?
What is your musical approach ? How is your perception ?
What do you feel when you hear music ?
Have you ever played with someone who really plays jazz ? I don't mean wannabes like us but real musicians.
-
Seriously, musicians of that calibre don’t need any preparation or agreement whatsoever to play a standard like that, other than agreeing which tune to play.
Originally Posted by ragman1
In Miles’ group, he didn’t even bother to name the tune half the time, just kicked off a tempo and expected the group to recognise the tune immediately, it’s well known from interviews etc.
I don’t think I have a reputation for spouting nonsense on this forum, as far as I am aware.
-
I do not understand this.
Originally Posted by ragman1
The duo plays at a high level and the two musicians feel each other perfectly.
What is this about?
-
I'll answer you but it won't make the slightest difference.
Originally Posted by Lionelsax
1. Some of it I like, some I don't. If I don't, I dump it.
2. That's too complicated for a quick answer.
3. What I feel obviously depends on the music.
4. Yes, several. Guitarists, sax players, bands (not big bands).
-
Sorry, but neither of us have the slightest idea what they did or didn't do. And how do we know which take that was? Or how much rehearsal they had?
Originally Posted by grahambop
You rarely spout nonsense as I'm well aware, but this idea that they just say hello, turn on the recording, play a tune, and then go off to the pub (or something) sounds unrealistic to me. Not that it couldn't be done but I get a little bored with this idea that good musicians are some kind of supermen. For one thing they'd have to work out which arrangement they're using, wouldn't they?
-
It's about you being right and someone else being wrong :-)
Originally Posted by kris
Have you listened to the other duets with guitarists that he did? Some felt much more in touch with each other than others. Personally, I had the feeling he and Moreno were in different spaces to a large extent. Not badly, but enough to make a difference.
There's no reason at all to assume that any two jazz musicians, just because they're jazz musicians, are going to match each other perfectly every time. In fact, it's rubbish. We're different people, different brains, different spirits.
I'd say we're very lucky to find other players with whom we feel connected and in tune with. 'You're only as good as the people you play with'. Haven't you heard that saying?
-
lol, despite all that preparation and rehearsal they must have done.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
I wouldn't know, as I said. But if they weren't entirely compatible there's not much one can do about it. C'est la vie, etc. But they obviously felt compatible enough to post the video.
-
Generally you bring with you what you've got, do you rehearsal a conversation with someone you don't know ?
Originally Posted by ragman1
I can talk only about my experience, I invest on myself, I work the tunes I know.
I'm not reading the Real Book, the few tunes I know I've got them inside me, it's a melody and a form, everything can happen if the form is respected.
Great players has got this culture.
It really happens in real jam sessions... Do you think they read the Real Book while they're playing and say : "You're wrong ! Look at the Bible !"
Those who created it have got a big regret. They wanted a book just for a kind a help, nothing else.
Now everyone reads it like if it were classical music, something that cannot change.
When you play a tune, everything has to move ! It's interaction.
Everyone knows On Green Dolphin Street ! I don't know where it is but it's a big standard.
Seriously you're such a... You're such a... ragman1 !
-
Why do you think they need an ‘arrangement’ or a rehearsal? It’s called improvising for a reason!
Originally Posted by ragman1
It’s a standard, one of the most well-known, it’s usually played in Eb, there is no ‘arrangement’ because everyone knows the common changes. They are not supermen, they just use their ears and play together. The sax player only had to listen for a few moments to get the tempo and then he joined in, improvising simultaneously. At a suitable point in the form, they went into the melody.
Honestly, I don’t know why you think this is so difficult to do, I could probably do it myself, though not as well as they do, obviously.
I bet if I went for a lesson with Mike Moreno he might well expect me to play something with him off the cuff like this, probably so he could gauge what level I was at.
Seriously, I’m baffled why you think jazz musicians at their level don’t do this.
I have seen plenty of duo gigs where someone just calls a standard and off they go. In fact it’s probably easier to do when there are only 2 players.
I think the key here is that this idea sounds unrealistic TO YOU. That much is true.
-
For example, here's Mike Moreno and Julian Lage turning on the amp, buggering about with the controls for a couple of minutes, then launching into a standard. About as chaotic and unrehearsed as you can get, I should think. Music starts at 2:14.
-
It's all laughable.
Here everyone convinces Ragman that the duo plays nice.
Musicians of this caliber play standards without any laborious rehearsals.
I myself played standards in various types of instrumental duets for several years.
Good ears and good knowledge of jazz standards are essential.
There is no philosophy in this.
-
Maybe a quick talk through for arrangement ideas if you are recording? But yeah rehearsal would be unnecessary especially for a old warhorse like GDS
-
I’ve done many gigs where there was no rehearsal or arrangements worked out in advance. Just show up, call a tune, maybe say something “I’ll give you 8 bars up front” or "right on it", and you just play. I did a gig with a pianist a couple of weeks ago where we did that. Not mention countless sitting-in or jam situations. Playing a standard off the cuff is part of the basic jazz player’s tool kit (and jazZ players don’t get much more basic than I).
Originally Posted by grahambop
-
Waste of time.
Originally Posted by ragman1
-
I insist you need to know which version (if you don't like the word arrangement) you're both playing. Most songs have different versions. The players themselves may have suggested that they do x,y or z to make it different.
This is an ignorant discussion because, as I said before, we don't know what they did. Not a single one of us, myself included.
-
Correct!
Originally Posted by kris
-
+1
Originally Posted by John A.
Totally agreed.
-
what do you need this knowledge for?
Originally Posted by ragman1
Two musicians play great music.
Is that not enough?
Maybe you still want to know what was for dinner and what they drank ... because they swing very well.
ps.
They could treat the first take as a sound test and discuss/introduction/-it's probably normal.
It doesn't matter. They recorded it and it's OK.
-
You contradict yourself.
-
Not ignorance, but informed speculation. You’re the one who seems least informed on the subject.
Originally Posted by ragman1



Reply With Quote

Tal farlow / Suhr guitar content, title track from my new album
Today, 06:33 PM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos