-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
I'm not sure if this is typical, but the double bass players I know seem to be very open minded about instruments. If they go into a shop with forty bases and the Chinese base is producing the sound they like, they buy the Chinese bass.
Also, nothing wrong with "gut strung". That's another sound that some prefer.
-
01-28-2024 10:18 PM
-
Originally Posted by Krinky
Also, nothing wrong with "gut strung". That's another sound that some prefer.
-
Harmony guitars in the 1961 Aldens catalogue. Not Aldens guitars; Holiday guitars were also shown in the catalogue: text at the lower half of the first page.
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
-
The bass in Wim's post is pronounced with a short a.
We have the grand and petit bouche varieties here.
-
Originally Posted by sgosnell
-
Originally Posted by nevershouldhavesoldit
So yes, "This was only a test. If this had been an actual joke, the words you heard would have been followed by laughter".
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
Originally Posted by nevershouldhavesoldit
-
Originally Posted by Krinky
They seem to get that airy thunk almost like an upright bass better than most electric basses.
-
Originally Posted by Doctor Jeff
-
Originally Posted by Doctor Jeff
Just food for thought... The ones pros use aren't the same ones you buy for $500.
-
Originally Posted by Doctor Jeff
Originally Posted by AllanAllen
-
Pardon the segue, but does nut material really affect the tone to a meaningful degree?
I've read that bone is a go-to material, camel bone in particular. Bone from sheep & goats tends to be smooth and very hard, are these ever used? How are synthetics like Delrin or TFE?
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
This is just one example of the many ways to upgrade a basic guitar for gigging and road-ready reliability. I set up a cheap Epiphone Les Paul I bought in about 1995 with Grover tuners, Tusc nut, new pickups / wiring / pots / switch / jack, plus a good fret level / crown / dress / polish. I’ve used it on hundreds of blues gigs since I got it without failure of any kind. I have less than $400 in it including purchase price. That’s not too shabby!
-
So is Tusq a (tm) of GraphTech, or something else? From what I read it's some kind of synthetic polymer, but no real info beyond that.
Then there's a bit of salestalk about how ivory and bone are bad because.. well, ivory trade is pretty much banned in the West. But they lump-in bone with ivory, which is silly as bone - even camel bone - is very readily available for pennies. They eat those beasts all throughout the mid-east, south Asia etc. Very common source of meat over there.
Anyway, $15-20 for a little stick of plastic. Sounds like a heck of a racket!
-
If it's just the retro look that people want there is always Eastwood guitars. They make reissues, or copies or tributes - not sure what the best word is - of many Kay, Harmony, Supro and Teisco models. I bought one of their Harmony H59s, which they call an Airline H59. Seems they own the Airline name and maybe the Harmony designs but not the name. Same story with Supro and Teisco.
Airline
– Eastwood Guitars
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
Just a moment...
TUSQ Nuts | Graph Tech Guitar Labs
-
Originally Posted by Bop Head
TUSQ is a trademark, not a patent. Graph Tech reached a settlement last year with the Danish manufacturer Steel Series, which used the name TUSQ for its gaming headphones, but will cease and desist.
-
The marketing-speak is dense..
"TUSQ is a proprietary material which is precision engineered under high pressure and heat. It is specifically formulated to deliver the right frequencies with the optimum transfer rate to the top of your guitar every time. Because of the way TUSQ is made, it is a consistent material that is rich in tone and harmonic content."
precision engineered under high pressure and heat
specifically formulated to deliver the right frequencies with the optimum transfer rate to the top of your guitar every time (...) it is a consistent material that is rich in tone and harmonic content."
Something tells me this material is a close cousin to POM, aka Delrin, Acetal, etc.
-
Originally Posted by WimWalther
Right now, I have them on my Raines, my ESP, and my Epi LP (all inexpensive 7 string solid bodies that ranged in cost to me from $200 to $700 new). Along with better tuners, bridges and electronics, these are great working guitars all of which have played 100s of gigs each.
-
If you google “what is tusq made of” phenolic resin pops up. Graphtech claims it’s a proprietary variant (reading between the lines) because of the way it’s molded.
From what I understand, it’s chemically the same as micarta, but perhaps denser because of GT’s high-pressure molding process. It’s a good material for nuts, bridge saddles, bridge pins. But obviously, as with nearly everything in guitarland, there's a lot of marketing BS. I assume people see through that, and I usually don’t get worked up about that.
As far as nut material in general goes, I’ve only ever swapped nuts once - at a luthier’s advice I had the original plastic nut on my Strat switched to bone, rather than doing the baking soda and glue trick on the worn down saddles. He insisted it would make a big difference, and it was cheap amid the other work being done.
It sounded noticeably better, but that was in the context of replacing a worn out nut, having the frets leveled and re-crowned and a full set-up, so I don’t know how much to attribute to the change in nut material. My guess is not much.
I’ve had micarta, plastic, Tusq, and bone nuts stock on various guitars. It worked fine on all of them. None except the strat ever had a problem that required the nut to be replaced.
I used to have a Gibson flattop with an adjustable wood saddle. I switched that and the plastic bridge pins for Tusq. The guitar got louder and brighter. Louder and brighter than it would have with bone? Shrug.Last edited by John A.; 01-30-2024 at 11:48 AM.
-
Tusq, from my experience using it, is in the neighborhood of bone hardness, but I don't have any actual numbers. I like it for the reasons enumerated above, and I can't tell any difference in tone between it and bone. The only issue I have with bone is that it's variable, which is unsurprising since it's a natural material. I've never used camel bone, but cattle bone is widely available in the US and the most common nut material. Hundreds of millions of cattle are slaughtered annually for meat, and I have no moral issues with using their bones for whatever use. I've never heard anyone complain about using bone for stringed instrument nuts, nor for anything else, other than the general complaint of the PETA crowd, who want to stop killing all animals for all reasons. That will not happen.
One other advantage of Tusq is that it also is available in black, and that's a nice touch on some instruments. A black Tusq nut and bridge combination can look good, depending on one's taste and the other aesthetics of the guitar. I will say that I'm not a huge fan of their picks. The feel and sound just aren't what I prefer. The nuts, though, are IMHO superior to bone, mostly because they don't bind strings when they make big angle bends at the headstock, and don't seem to develop ridges in the slots, as bone can sometimes do.
-
Originally Posted by Banksia
Henriksen Bud or Blu 6
Today, 07:53 PM in For Sale