-
Tobias Hoffmann - very cool
-
06-12-2025 06:08 AM
-
I came across this and had not heard of him before, theres one for sale on the forum. I thought the tone of this guitar to be exceptional and the players very good. If I was shopping in that neighborhood it would be on my (very) short list.
-
Erich's guitars tend to be wonderful acoustic instruments, for the most part. He's also a very lovely person. I highly recommend him to anyone considering an acoustic archtop.
-
Acoustic archtops have their place but they will always sound better amplified to me. I get that people want a consistent tone and loudness up and down the neck and historically they had a purpose but I’m not sure why more modern players don’t embrace a different approach that is more dynamic and interesting to my ears. It would be interesting to hear more flattops in Jazz settings.
To each their own, though !
-
A big benefit is that you can play an Acoustic Archtop unplugged at home, it's a great sound. Very enjoyable too, especially for those long hours of practising.
Originally Posted by Marker
To my ears, generally, Flat Top Acoustic guitars have a more boomy bass than an Acoustic Archtop, still a nice sound, but different.
-
That definitely sounds like one you'd want to take to that island!
Originally Posted by Rickco

Of course it is. And the sensation of a big instrument resonating in your arms to the response of your touch just adds to it.
Originally Posted by GuyBoden
Plus a nasal/hollow quality, on the trebles but also in the sense that the larger the body, the more they seem to hold back a part of the lower registers for a while. I guess that's part of what makes them boomy.To my ears, generally, Flat Top Acoustic guitars have a more boomy bass than an Acoustic Archtop
I've said this before: to me an archtop combines the depth (but not boominess) in the lower registers of a big-body flattop with the clear & immediate (but not as nasal) higher registers of a small-body flattop.
-
Maybe they've never heard of you?
Originally Posted by Marker
Sorry, that was a joke, not a dish.
-
It’s personal
-
To me it's not the frequency difference between flat tops and archtops. Frequency varies quite a bit between an OM and dread on one side and an 18" vs 16" on the other. That and a bunch of other variables like construction and materials.
What gets me about a good acoustic archtop is the sound envelope. The attack, the initial emphasis, then the decay. If that's combined with just enough overtone information, nothing sounds better to my ears.
-
Are those yours?
Originally Posted by Hammertone
-
Not an archtop, but an experimental Claudio Pagelli model which I find really appealing. Was Pagelli looking for a kind of hybrid sound-wise between the archtop and the flat top here? Some fine acoustic playing by Francis Coletta, born in Marseille, settled in Switzerland, fantastic player whom I saw once live leading a big band with an f-hole Telecaster. I believe he used to tour with Sinatra on his European dates.
-
Originally Posted by Hammertone
The two on the right are mine. The one on the left belongs to a friend.
Originally Posted by Rickco
-
Would you say the one in the video is representative (within reason) of the sound of the ones you have and have heard? I think the description said it was under 4 lbs. I looking at a cutaway of his on Rev. perfect for me weight and size, no way to hear it first but trying to find out more about his guitars.
Originally Posted by Hammertone
-
Yes.
Originally Posted by Rickco



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos