The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Posts 176 to 189 of 189
  1. #176
    m_d
    m_d is offline

    User Info Menu

    Tobias Hoffmann - very cool

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #177

    User Info Menu

    I came across this and had not heard of him before, theres one for sale on the forum. I thought the tone of this guitar to be exceptional and the players very good. If I was shopping in that neighborhood it would be on my (very) short list.

  4. #178

    User Info Menu

    Erich's guitars tend to be wonderful acoustic instruments, for the most part. He's also a very lovely person. I highly recommend him to anyone considering an acoustic archtop.


    Attached Images Attached Images Acoustic Archtop Tone-solomonx3-jpg 

  5. #179

    User Info Menu

    Acoustic archtops have their place but they will always sound better amplified to me. I get that people want a consistent tone and loudness up and down the neck and historically they had a purpose but I’m not sure why more modern players don’t embrace a different approach that is more dynamic and interesting to my ears. It would be interesting to hear more flattops in Jazz settings.

    To each their own, though !

  6. #180

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Marker
    Acoustic archtops have their place but they will always sound better amplified to me. I get that people want a consistent tone and loudness up and down the neck and historically they had a purpose but I’m not sure why more modern players don’t embrace a different approach that is more dynamic and interesting to my ears. It would be interesting to hear more flattops in Jazz settings.

    To each their own, though !
    A big benefit is that you can play an Acoustic Archtop unplugged at home, it's a great sound. Very enjoyable too, especially for those long hours of practising.

    To my ears, generally, Flat Top Acoustic guitars have a more boomy bass than an Acoustic Archtop, still a nice sound, but different.

  7. #181

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Rickco
    If I was shopping in that neighborhood it would be on my (very) short list.
    That definitely sounds like one you'd want to take to that island!

    Quote Originally Posted by GuyBoden
    it's a great sound. Very enjoyable too, especially for those long hours of practising.
    Of course it is. And the sensation of a big instrument resonating in your arms to the response of your touch just adds to it.

    To my ears, generally, Flat Top Acoustic guitars have a more boomy bass than an Acoustic Archtop
    Plus a nasal/hollow quality, on the trebles but also in the sense that the larger the body, the more they seem to hold back a part of the lower registers for a while. I guess that's part of what makes them boomy.
    I've said this before: to me an archtop combines the depth (but not boominess) in the lower registers of a big-body flattop with the clear & immediate (but not as nasal) higher registers of a small-body flattop.

  8. #182

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Marker
    I get that people want a consistent tone and loudness up and down the neck and historically they had a purpose but I’m not sure why more modern players don’t embrace a different approach that is more dynamic and interesting to my ears.
    Maybe they've never heard of you?

    Sorry, that was a joke, not a dish.

  9. #183

    User Info Menu

    It’s personal

  10. #184

    User Info Menu

    To me it's not the frequency difference between flat tops and archtops. Frequency varies quite a bit between an OM and dread on one side and an 18" vs 16" on the other. That and a bunch of other variables like construction and materials.

    What gets me about a good acoustic archtop is the sound envelope. The attack, the initial emphasis, then the decay. If that's combined with just enough overtone information, nothing sounds better to my ears.

  11. #185

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammertone
    Erich's guitars tend to be wonderful acoustic instruments, for the most part. He's also a very lovely person. I highly recommend him to anyone considering an acoustic archtop.


    Are those yours?

  12. #186
    m_d
    m_d is offline

    User Info Menu

    Not an archtop, but an experimental Claudio Pagelli model which I find really appealing. Was Pagelli looking for a kind of hybrid sound-wise between the archtop and the flat top here? Some fine acoustic playing by Francis Coletta, born in Marseille, settled in Switzerland, fantastic player whom I saw once live leading a big band with an f-hole Telecaster. I believe he used to tour with Sinatra on his European dates.


  13. #187

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammertone
    Erich's guitars tend to be wonderful acoustic instruments, for the most part. He's also a very lovely person. I highly recommend him to anyone considering an acoustic archtop.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rickco
    Are those yours?
    The two on the right are mine. The one on the left belongs to a friend.

  14. #188

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Hammertone
    The two on the right are mine. The one on the left belongs to a friend.
    Would you say the one in the video is representative (within reason) of the sound of the ones you have and have heard? I think the description said it was under 4 lbs. I looking at a cutaway of his on Rev. perfect for me weight and size, no way to hear it first but trying to find out more about his guitars.

  15. #189

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Rickco
    Would you say the one in the video is representative (within reason) of the sound of the ones you have and have heard? I think the description said it was under 4 lbs. I looking at a cutaway of his on Rev. perfect for me weight and size, no way to hear it first but trying to find out more about his guitars.
    Yes.