Hi OP,
I do have a Loar LH-700 and a Höfner so I think I can contribute something.
Loar
It’s a beautiful guitar with a big acoustic voice. Without wanting to diss anyone’s favorite, many of the guitars that have been mentioned as alternatives are IME nowhere close in timbre and volume (Guild Savoy, EXL-1, Epi Broadway – which I’ve had for quite sometime – or the new Epi “MAsterbilt”).
Note: when I bought it mine had on Gally black nylons, if you can believe it, and some of those who posted very critical comments had put flatwounds on. If you want a big acoustic voice, you have to put on the right strings. With Monel 12s, mine sings loud enough to play acoustically in small ensembles.
It does have a big, V-shape neck. It’s not to everyone’s tastes. To me, it’s ideal for playing “Freddy Green” grips and chord melody of the era.
Quality-wise: good woods, good neck-angle, it needed a 30€ fret level and I am utterly unconcerned with how the paint looks under the fretboard extension or whether the F-holes are bound

. Once it’s set-up well (and EVERY guitar needs a set-up) it plays and sounds great.
So in conclusion: it’s a very good guitar and if you want a replica of a 1920s archtop for below 1000, you basically have no alternative – a LH-700 or a LH-600 which, as far as I know, is the same guitar, just a little less ornate.
Of course “try before buy” would be ideal, but Thomann has a good return policy, so. Finding one used would be nice as well… lots of persons bought it for the wrong reasons or disliked the neck and want to get rid of it. I got mine for 500€ 1 yr ago.
Höfner
I have bought a Höfner about 2 months ago and I’d recommend you consider it, especially since you’re in Germany. If you want to do that, you have to do a bit of homework so you know what you’re looking for. There’s a lot of info on the web (guitarhq, dedicated “vintage höfner” site…). The modern Höfner company explicitly state on their website that they don’t answer on vintage models, so no surprise there at all.
I did my homework and spotted mine among many lesser ones being sold for about the same price. A 1953 model 465: carved spruce top, lam rosewood sides and back, in beautiful shape. It has a different voice from the Loar: scooped, less bark and sweeter – but in terms of volume and projection it competes.
The neck is also very different: big “D” profile, with a very round fretboard and narrow nut. Extremely comfortable to play, especially for rhythm and single note soloing… less so for chord melody due to the narrow string spacing. But all in all, a more comfortable guitar than the Loar. (BTW: I never thought I’d buy a non truss rod guitar, but the early 50s big maple neck with a metal reinforcement has withstood the test of time and is straight as an arrow).
I would recommend you look them up, and other German top-of-the-line archtops (e.g. the all-carved Hoyer Meisterklasse if you like the aesthetics, which I don’t).
DeArmonds
As Jeff pointed out, putting a floater on them has nothing to do with dissatisfaction with the acoustic voice, and everything to do with adding a beautiful jazz sound without compromising that acoustic voice. Personally, when I play in a band situation, I play rhythm acoustically (with a mic) and kick in my DeArmond when I have to solo.
I enclose a couple pics (apologies to those who’ve seen them 1000 times already) and two sound samples taken with an AudioTechnica mic into Garageband. The “Sweet georgia brown” intro is the Loar, the “Stomping at the Savoy” thing is the Höfner both acoustic and electric with a DeArmond Rhythm Chief. I have improved the electric set-up since, but I thing the two clips capture the difference in acoustic voice (and my bad playing too…).
Attachment 57996Attachment 57995
$8500 - 2010 Moffa Maestro Virtuoso Archtop Black...
Today, 03:35 AM in For Sale