-
You’re in business with that setup. How’s the string balance with the monels? I might throw some of those on to test it out.
-
12-12-2017 08:35 PM
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
Originally Posted by christianm77
-
Originally Posted by omphalopsychos
-
Originally Posted by radiofm74
-
Originally Posted by christianm77
-
Hey man, I'm stoked you not only got a bargain on a LH-700, but also found an FHC. Awesome!
And thanks for all the "fan club" members, ha!
Yeah, I took both the ES-150 and the L-5 to Seoul the first year, but the tailpiece on the ES-150 had started to crack before our gig the following year, so I just took the L-5 with the FHC. Both times I was just playing into a Reissue Twin Reverb (not my normal kind of amp, for sure), and both pickup worked pretty good with it. I'd actually give the edge to the FHC.
But, yeah, the more you play the guitar, the more it'll open up. It was amazing how much playing a whole evening of rhythm guitar on a gig totally opened up the 1939 L-5 I just got. It'd been sitting in it's case for a couple of months waiting to be sold. And it was impressive how much more open it was the next morning.
Plus, a proper set up and strings are crucial. I'm wary of always recommending the highest action or heaviest strings, but you got get at least enough tension to put that top in motion, and enough action so that the strings have room to oscillate when you thump it. I just checked the other day, and I'm 4/64" on the treble side and 6/64" on the bass at the 12th fret, with an almost perfectly straight neck. Of course, nut slots and bridge height are also part of the formula. But, as I understand it, that's not crazy-high action - definitely not Freddie Green territory. I have 12's (with a 14/18 swapped in on top) on my 1932 L-5, because it's so sensitive, it doesn't really benefit from the increased tension. But the 1939 really roars with 13's (again with a 14/18).
Anyway, congrats! You've basically got the ideal working acoustic/electric swing guitar rig.
-
Originally Posted by campusfive
PS: my action is currently at around 7/64’’ with 13s. It’s ok, but my left hand feels it. In time, and with a fret dressing in January, I might come down a bit and perhaps switch to 12s… Thanks for posting your set-up!Last edited by radiofm74; 12-13-2017 at 07:06 PM.
-
“Trad & Swing Jazz” jam night, and the Loar + Guitar Mike have behaved wonderfully. I mean, I have played better than ever (which does not mean very well), and this was due mostly to woodshedding – but the sound and feel of the guitar was super inspirational.
Even plugged in a Hot Rod Deluxe – not my favorite by any stretch of the imagination – the electric sound was great and very appropriate for the repertoire. When playing rhythm I went into a mike and, listening back to an absolutely crappy recording I’ve made of a song on my iPhone, I was actually too loud. I’ll have to be more careful about that. But the rhythm tone was also all I could ask for.
At the end I got quite a lot of compliments, and I am sure that it was in part because of how fitting my whole rig sounded (… and looked, I should add).
Happy camper here. Thanks to all for the incredibly good advice!
-
I have to collect hopefully next week.
I have read about the neck angle problems and asked the seller some questions. He said the action was 2mm at 12th and there's about 1mm left to go down on the bridge (and photos) which I was happy with - can always take a mil or two of the bridge.
!!! Forgot about if the tailpiece is touching the body !!!!
So fingers crossed.
It has a JS type neck mount.
Seller was selling to fund an Elferink.
-
Congrats!
I might get a new one from Thomann, or maybe a LH600, when they're back in stock in Europe.
I heard they have fixed the neck angle problem over time.
Don't know if it 's true.
Anyway if the guitar isn' t up the standards I'll just send it back.
-
Originally Posted by Jx30510
I looked at new but this one ended up less than half the Thomann price. Don't know if that's good or bad! I think it's fairly old with a few nicks. Don't think I'll be able to send this one back!
-
Some say they are great guitars, others say they're crap.
Over the time, and all the opinions that go all over the place, just want to try one and make my own opinion.
I really want a good acoustic archtop. I recently got a Martin Taylor Virtuoso, and I am totally furfilled with it.
So now, I'm looking for the real thing, solid carved top, parallel bracing, and cathedral sound.
If the Loar can do it, I'll take it.
Otherwise I'll look elsewhere.
Who knows, if I hit the target with one, it'll be fine.
Looking at the Gibson L48 or L50 on Reverb or wherever, but not sure they'll be that better.
-
Originally Posted by Jx30510
Are L48s and 50s carved?
Thanks
-
The LH 650 and LH 700 are great guitars. Having owned them both I preferred the ‘650 because of its fully round neck and it’s fabulously great tone. Combined with a Bartolini pickup I’ve never had an acoustic featuring a sweeter tone. I’ve not heard of LH700’s with neck angle issues. That’s their finest archtop. But I didn’t care for its V neck. Good luck!
-
They're great "raw materials " guitars. Might need a little fretwork and a setup, but then you'll have a beautiful solid wood cannon of an archtop.
-
I was the only bidder on a 700 a few years ago. Got it for a great price. And the original owner had already had the frets dressed, set up, and installed a K&K, complete with preamp. So not only were there no issues, it played great. It has a huge V neck, and I have small hands, but I find the neck very comfortable and don’t notice the size after a minute or two. I really wanted a 16” L5-style, and at €700 this was a steal. I use it to chunk out swing rhythm in small combos.
Last edited by stevo58; 07-17-2021 at 05:39 AM.
-
Originally Posted by 2bornot2bop
Looks like I'll be collecting it on Thursday. Cheers.
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
Originally Posted by stevo58
-
I still can't understand why they use the big clunky v-neck just for tradition. After all, Gibson themselves slimmed them down over time. I owned an original Gibson Loar, and as magical as it was, I had to part with it because of that d*** huge v-neck.
-
Originally Posted by Woody Sound
ps. Does the 300 have the v neck? I tried one briefly a few years ago when I had very little knowledge of Loars. I don't recall the neck 'shouting out' at me. Cheers
-
My problem with the V neck was that if I had intended to use the guitar ONLY as a rhythm box, it would have felt great. But the guitar sounded so good I wanted to play solos on it too, solo guitar, everything. And I found it uncomfortable for that. So I ended up getting frustrated with the guitar and never playing it.
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
Lovely
V neck totally acceptable!
Can anyone re - orientate the images pls?
'37 Gibson FB Radius
Today, 01:43 AM in The Builder's Bench