The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
Reply to Thread Bookmark Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Posts 26 to 48 of 48
  1. #26

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Chimera1to1
    Dont want to thread jack ATH. As I understand it, if you took two identical guitars with the same gauge strings but one guitar had a longer distance from the bridge to the string anchors than the other then as you depressed a string to fret it then the force required by the finger to overcome the action height would be less because the additional stretch to fret would be spread over a proportionately longer overall length of string. Likewise, if you were string bending then it would feel easier but you would have to bend the string further to achieve the same pitch change than on the shorter overall string length guitar. I'm quite happy to be corrected if I am wrong!!
    In principle you are right. But in practice it plays a very minor role. First, the extra strech of string added at the tailpiece is too short to have any significant effect. Second, the friction of the strings over the bridge saddle inhibits the stretching between the bridge and the tailpiece. I think our former forum member PTChris did an actual test of this and couldn't detect any measurable effect.
    Last edited by oldane; 06-03-2015 at 03:21 PM.

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #27

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by vinlander
    For me it would be hands down that one:



    An ES 350 with the same specs as Tal Farlows customized 350 of the 1950s. I'd like to have this one!

  4. #28

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by vintagelove
    A tobacco sunburst es175d, left handed.

    have the cash, there is not one for sale in the WORLD for the last few months.

    Enjoy your right handed lives!!!
    Have you tried the 'Lefty Emporium' in Springfield ;-)

  5. #29

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by oldane
    In principle you are right. But in practice it plays a very minor role. First, the extra strech of string added at the tailpiece is too short to have any significant effect. Second, the friction of the strings over the bridge saddle inhibits the stretching between the bridge and the tailpiece. I think our former forum member PTChris did an actual test of this and couldn't detect any measurable effect.
    So why do I find a difference in the tensions between say the Gibson and some other models I have played?

    Am I actually under a false impression?

  6. #30

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchtopHeaven
    So why do I find a difference in the tensions between say the Gibson and some other models I have played?

    Am I actually under a false impression?
    I think yes and no. The percieved fretting resistance is dependent on other factors as well. For example the fret size, the shape of the fret dressing, the cut of the nut slots, the neck relief, the neck profile, the fretboard radius + likely several other factors.
    Last edited by oldane; 06-03-2015 at 04:06 PM.

  7. #31

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchtopHeaven
    So why do I find a difference in the tensions between say the Gibson and some other models I have played?

    Am I actually under a false impression?
    weird innit ? i've felt this too ....
    can't be right tho , according to the physics

  8. #32

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by oldane
    I think yes and no. The percieved fretting resistance is dependent on other factors as well. For example the fret size, the shape of the fret dressing, the cut of the nut slots, the neck relief, the neck profile, the fretboard radius + likely several other factors.

    Lol damn these guitar thingies, I knew it wasn't going to be simple

  9. #33

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by rpguitar
    Over 100 guitars have passed through my hands over the years. I can appreciate many different types of guitars. So technical specs are less important to me at this point than playability and ergonomic attributes, which as a set are elusive, even in the most costly instruments:

    - Absolute tuning stability
    - Near perfect intonation
    - Smooth frets that feel invisible
    - Very lightweight
    - Balanced when sitting or standing
    - Fingerboard radius that lets every fretting effort hit its mark
    - Feels good for finger style as well as plectrum playing
    - Strums great, picks great, touch sensitive, punchy
    - Acoustically responsive and dynamic
    - Electrically responsive and dynamic
    - No wolf tones or bum notes

    Some of the above imply that it must be an acoustically capable guitar, and that would be right. A 16" or 17" archtop would be fine, thank you. I even have a couple that actually approach the ideal. But it has not been easy, or cheap, or a short trip, to get to this destination!
    My first choice would be RP's vintage refinished Super 400. I'm hoping he'll decide to part with it someday. It's tough to recreate any guitar that breaks the mold.

  10. #34

    User Info Menu

    My dream guitar would be long scale, rosewood fingerboard, 43mm nut width, single coil Charlie Christian pickup, hollow or semi acoustic...



    or this....





    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-img_0608-478x640-jpg
    I've come close with this......


    But soon enough I'll have something like this.

    :-D

  11. #35

    User Info Menu

    Archie, If I could build my perfect Guitar, it would be a Blond Gibson Johnny Smith.
    Its basically my Heritage Johnny Smith with the build quality and solidness of my L5wes.
    Joe D

  12. #36

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe DeNisco
    Archie, If I could build my perfect Guitar, it would be a Blond Gibson Johnny Smith.
    Its basically my Heritage Johnny Smith with the build quality and solidness of my L5wes.
    Joe D

    I've always wanted a Johnny Smith, you're a lucky man. Didn't I hear you saying it was better than the Gibson version? I heard someone mention that and gave reasons as to why but I forgot (better being subjective of course).

    An early blonde model is my next target after hitting the L5 CES a few months back.

  13. #37

    User Info Menu

    Archie,
    I played a Gibson Johnny Smith and it was extraordinary. It had that typical Gibson tank-like feel to it. It sounded great acoustically and I didn't play it plugged in. Problem is, I wouldn't pay $12,000 for one that is in excellent condition because it doesn't make sense to me. Its probably well worth it, but just not to me. That's why the Heritage made sense. I like the Heritage a lot. But I wish the Gibson was cheaper. Think about it. I have a Johnny Smith signed Guitar and A BEAUTIFUL L5 for a hair under $10,000. See what I'm saying..
    Joe D


    Quote Originally Posted by ArchtopHeaven
    I've always wanted a Johnny Smith, you're a lucky man. Didn't I hear you saying it was better than the Gibson version? I heard someone mention that and gave reasons as to why but I forgot (better being subjective of course).

    An early blonde model is my next target after hitting the L5 CES a few months back.

  14. #38

    User Info Menu

    Id make a guitar that combines everything I like, in one and the same instrument


    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-image-jpg

  15. #39

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by fws6
    Id make a guitar that combines everything I like, in one and the same instrument


    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-image-jpg
    Which occasionally end up like Linguini with Clam sauce flavored Ice Cream

  16. #40

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe DeNisco
    Archie,
    I played a Gibson Johnny Smith and it was extraordinary. It had that typical Gibson tank-like feel to it. It sounded great acoustically and I didn't play it plugged in. Problem is, I wouldn't pay $12,000 for one that is in excellent condition because it doesn't make sense to me. Its probably well worth it, but just not to me. That's why the Heritage made sense. I like the Heritage a lot. But I wish the Gibson was cheaper. Think about it. I have a Johnny Smith signed Guitar and A BEAUTIFUL L5 for a hair under $10,000. See what I'm saying..
    Joe D
    Damn I didn't know they were so heavy.

    I wish everyone could play that Eccleshall JS type I got. Its a guitar you have to try, its everything i would expect an vintage JS to be but its feather light and surprisingly sounds super plugged in. Well it also came with a BJB :-)

    You did well mate :-)

  17. #41

    User Info Menu

    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-leeritenour-l5-jpg This (Lee Ritenour) sized L5, but with a 25" scale, 1 3/4" nut and a 'proper' L5 tailpiece.
    15 1/2" lower bout, 2 5/8" body depth, floater JS pickup - already there.
    That G word still has magic for me, despite all the not-so-good variables over the years.

  18. #42

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchtopHeaven
    Damn I didn't know they were so heavy.

    I wish everyone could play that Eccleshall JS type I got. Its a guitar you have to try, its everything i would expect an vintage JS to be but its feather light and surprisingly sounds super plugged in. Well it also came with a BJB :-)

    You did well mate :-)
    I've never seen an Eccleshall over here in the US. I'll look out for one.

    Thanks, Joe D.

  19. #43

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe DeNisco
    I've never seen an Eccleshall over here in the US. I'll look out for one.

    Thanks, Joe D.
    No you wont find one mate, it was a one off. The guy usually builds flat tops and some are played or were played by David Bowie. In fact the Ecclshall I had was used by hank marvin (although I don't shout that bit ;-)

    Heres Bowie with his Eccle's and Hank with my one (well now my friends one).


    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-2001-07totalguitar-bowiewitheccleshall12-string-jpgIf You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-hank-eccleshall-guitar-jpg
    Last edited by Archie; 06-04-2015 at 04:55 PM.

  20. #44

    User Info Menu

    Very very cool Archie. Thanks for posting.
    Joe D

  21. #45

    User Info Menu

    a dream guitar? as in what i really super want or one guitar to replace the others? i don't know. i suppose something based off a collings soco would be a pretty good summary of my playing style and tones. i'd just have to decide on a spruce or maple top, and minis, pafs or tv jones. but definitely the big headstock and inlays. it may even have a bigsby. but it would look a lot like this one (though it might also be wine red):

    Collings SoCo Deluxe Vintage White (370)

    that would probably suffice as a be all, end all #1 type guitar.

    if we are just talking irrational dream guitars, then this:

    If You Could Build Your Dream Guitar-00994_00994_front_detail-jpg

    or possibly the older, full depth one with the funny switches. don't know. or maybe a nice old sheraton.

  22. #46

    User Info Menu

    Isn't Chris Eccleshall still building guitars in Ireland? He could probably build another like Hanks.

    Just looked him up, website says 'west country' so still in England apparently, and still list archtops as builds.
    Last edited by bananafist; 06-07-2015 at 07:34 AM.

  23. #47

    User Info Menu

    As soon I make that dream guitar it will no longer be my dream guitar and then I'll just want something else. This is our unfortunate lot gentlemen.

  24. #48

    User Info Menu

    If I could build the perfect guitar, it'd be my Ibanez with a poly finish and a single floater!