-
Originally Posted by jazznero
I was apprehensive about not having a hard shell case -- I'd never had a soft case before. But, there really is almost nothing to worry about. The shoulder straps alone are worth the changeover from hard shell. Frees both hands for the rest of my gear and everything is now one trip. Faster, easier and I don't have to leave my equipment exposed to theft.
-
12-18-2020 11:17 PM
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
JohnLast edited by John A.; 12-19-2020 at 02:46 PM.
-
Thanks John A. for the answer. What model is yours? The M80 sleeve, the M80 "normal" or the M80 vertigo?
Thank you very much!!
-
Originally Posted by jazznero
John
-
Hi John,
Is It the dreadnough one too Big for the gcs-1-es? I have the 1-es not the 16-1 from comins.. It Will fit an ordinary jazz box like an Es-175 right?
-
Originally Posted by jazznero
Maybe rpjazzguitar can chime in with which size Mono he uses with his Comins?
John
-
Originally Posted by John A.
-
Thank you very much!!!
-
Originally Posted by jazznero
-
Originally Posted by patshep
Did you finally put the Seth Lovers in the GCS1? If so, can you compare them with the Florance Voodoo you used to have?
Still using flats? What gauge?
-
A couple of updates after a lot of use of the GCS-1.
Because of issues with my hands, I string it with 11-42. Plain 3rd.
This gives it a slightly softer feel.
Tuning stability, never a strong point (although not terrible), is no worse. I think the strings bind at the nut and bridge. Hooking a finger underneath the strings and pulling upward improves the accuracy. Nut sauce didn't solve the problem. Next time I have to take it in for anything I'll have a luthier go over it.
Sounds fine to me -- I have multiple clips posted on the jam thread under Improvisation on this forum.
The coil split option also sounds pretty good.
Overall, I'm happy with the guitar -- and will be a smidge happier when I solve the tuning issue.
-
Binding at the nut and/or bridge with a .011 set would seem somewhat unusual, especially if it has had bigger strings on it. One possibility is that the slots are rough, not smooth and polished as they should be. Burrs at the edge is also possible, but not as likely.
-
Originally Posted by sgosnell
-
I picked up one of these used a few weeks ago. The playability is excellent and the tone sounds great, although perhaps a bit on the bright side. The frets and neck are better than any guitar I've had (mostly American Fenders, Gibsons and Martins).
However, I can't get the intonation right. Octaves on the G especially are flat, despite having the bridge saddle moved as far forward as possible. It is starting to irritate me to the point that I'm considering getting rid of it.
-
Mine intonates perfectly. The G saddle is about 3/4 of the way towards the tailpiece.
On yours, are the other string saddles about where they should be, or are they all near their limits?
First thing is to try a different string, if you haven't already done that.
If the other saddles are in the usual spots, and a new string doesn't help, I'm stumped.
One thing I do know is that Bill Comins answers his email and has great customer service.
-
The top few strings are at or near the limit. Using Thomastik Swing 12s.
-
Mine came, perfectly adjusted, bought new, with 11s. The saddles were sort of in the middle. Usual pattern for a plain 3rd. rd
I use lighter strings now, with the most extreme saddle being the 3rd, but toward the tailpiece. Opposite from yours. If the strings are really old, I'd put on new ones before doing anything else. Old strings really can go flat that way.
There are real experts on this forum, who, hopefully, will chime in. I don't number myself among them, although I know how to do some basic things.
If new strings didn't help, what I would do is a basic setup (I use the basic instructions on the Fender website, but there are lots of videos on youtube).
That involves a new set of strings. Then, various checks on the neck and strings. May involve truss rod, bridge height and saddle adjustments. Requires a set of feeler gauges and a metal ruler with 64ths or mm, available at any hardware store for less than $20.
My guess is that there's something wrong with the neck or its adjustment. So, I'd be careful with the truss rod, which, in my case, means I wouldn't touch it and I'd take it to a luthier.
-
Thank you. I am pretty comfortable doing setups and will give it some more attention to hopefully figure out the issue.
-
Originally Posted by diode
-
I love my GCS-1. Very versatile guitar and the tuning has been very stable since I got it a few years ago. Zero intonation issues.
-
Originally Posted by Smashies
Hi. I've owned the exact 'Tangerineburst' GCS-1ES guitar used in the SoundPure video at the start of this thread since 2012. (I bought it, minty used, from a SoundPure customer back then, matched the serial number—when the guitar's page was still up to check—and it turned out it was this same exact guitar. Cool, eh? lol)
My very short take on the GCS-1ES: As stock, there were phenomenal tones aplenty, with lots of clear, articulate sustain, very even across and up the neck. The single-coil mode was good, too. Zero need to 'upgrade' the fine KA pickups, IMO. Great neck, too (although I do tend to adapt almost immediately when swapping guitars). Currently, I have it professionally set up with Chrome 12s, nut and bridge radius adjusted, etc., specifically as a jazz guitar, and it has, IMO, a superbly full, warm tone with clear, immediate attack. I absolutely love it! Try one if you ever get the chance.
(I also just wanted to add that, IMHO, for fusion or rock use, these guitars would also be really versatile. Before putting the Chrome 12s on for jazzin' out, I was, at first, rockin' out with 10s and I was still getting a superb, warm, singing sustain—think 'Cliffs of Dover' Eric Johnson [originally recorded with his ES-335 from what I've repeatedly read]. Played it that way for quite a while, too, until I eventually decided one day that it was SO articulate I'd rather have it as a more functionally gig-able [i.e., non-feedbacking] jazz guitar. "OMG... This is a 'super' guitar... " kept running through my head!)
Then, about two years ago, I became intrigued with the D'Angelico EX-SS after watching some rather 'modern-sounding' jazz videos. After some patient searching, I found a 'blem' at MF for a phenomenal price and bought it. It was a beautiful, all black model with white binding details (rather looking like a 'stealth grand piano' in appearance and vibe, IMO). However, in playing the guitar, it somehow just felt a bit off to me (yeah, and I'm one who tends to adapt really easily, right?!). Maybe a pro setup might've helped, got me. It was then that I thought to look a bit carefully into the specs. (a late lesson learned there!) Turns out that it has a 16" radius and a 25" scale. Now normally, a 25" scale would mean nothing at all to a PRS player such as myself, but I did find that the16" radius seemed to be quite flat for my liking. Yeah, it bothered me, surprising to admit, even to myself. I also thought that the overall tonal quality seemed a bit, er, flat somehow, too, and it was definitely something I would want to be thinking about a pickup replacement sooner than later. (I'm generally not someone to swap stock pickups, so...)
Anyway, after a few days playing it, not really digging it all that much, I also somehow discovered that the cool black stair-step tailpiece had actually been mounted very poorly, actually canting upwards on the bass side by almost 1/8", with the screws therefore not even placed parallel to the binding! (It was quite noticeably off once you looked for it). Wha?! So... D-A's quality control here was... meh at best. IIRC, there were also a few other slighter cosmetic issues I'd be able to ignore (some binding bleed), but in the end, that tailpiece issue was understandably really nagging at me and became a great excuse to return an otherwise lovely-looking guitar. So I did, and I don't miss it. (I also pretty much never send new things back, so...)
Sorry for this late reply, hope it'll still be of help to somebody.Last edited by ooglybong; 11-11-2021 at 01:35 PM.
-
I've just returned from a "test drive" of a GCS 1, maple top, rosewood fingerboard in violin burst.....From a Comins authorized/specialized seller . I was alone in the store so no disturbance at all. Through my fender mustang micro headphone amp "clean amp"...
It's a nice looking guitar and lighter than I thought it would be....
YMMV. this is my very personal review of the one instrument I could get my hands on....
Pros : the tuners are great and have a nice feel.....the knobs too...the finishing is impeccable as is the colour . I did like the hum free coil split (last user left it like that I guess) although not a feature I normally would reach for....the tweed case looked nice.
Cons: The neck! thick/fat and wide whatever you want to call it.. and all glossy,. The action was too high and the stock strings were too small (plain "G" ) and not "Flats" I thought these were aimed at the Jazzers??! Could not keep in tune ..tuned it with the strobe open string..fine, 5-7 frets up the neck and it's off a tad, worse at 12th fret and beyond . At this point I gave up checking the intonation which should have left Bill's shop in perfect playable shape. Strings tone was very uneven! The tone pots (only tried the neck pup tone ) had very uneven tapers ..no treble to too much treble in barely a turn on the knob, there was no subtlety there...A weird thing for me also: when you are holding it in playing position you can see the block of bare wood in the top F hole....like I said weird and uninspiring... It did not sound special or anything.. I had to work a lot to get a decent tone let alone a jazz one ! I donT have to do this with any of my d'Angelicos or even my Schecter solo II on my mustang micro clean amp....The price !
I've not tried the GCS 16 which (dealer did not have any on hand) should be a better choice but still more expensive... and I'm done with fat large guitars, they just kill my back,shoulders and neck.
I so wanted to 'love" this GCS-1. and just play but nope, it's not for me.
Ray
-
Myself and a few others here own the GCS 16-1 and I know I'm really happy with mine. If I play gigs again it will be my go to for jazz.
If your interested in the GCS 16-1, fyi, it's going up $200 to $2399 this June.
-
Originally Posted by Strbender
. hence why I wanted to move on the GCS 1....a rare bird in these parts....and for the 16 that translates to $2999 cdn
a lot of $$$$$
I'm glad you like the 16..
RayLast edited by RayS; 04-22-2022 at 06:09 PM.
-
Originally Posted by patshep
The Moon Song, Johnny Mandell
Today, 05:51 AM in The Songs