-
Ok, I lost my toneprint virginity and didn't like it. The Morse toneprint is too much and it was hard to dial in something I can use.
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
To me, reverb should allow one to speak a sentence and not have the words run into each other - most of the settings on the HOF seem oriented to generate sweet mush, pleasant to the ear but not to the message.
Again it's all taste. Others will likely not share my taste and that's more than fine, it makes the world interesting.
To reiterate, I found a setting on the HOF that does work pretty well and I think it's a great reverb. Maybe they'll permit yours truly to have a 4thstuning toneprint...yeah, right.
-
10-26-2012 08:04 PM
-
In my experience if a reverb pedal two great sounds I am already sold. I never tried one I liked much more than that... If the spring and plate on the Supernatural are that good it's worth it. I just use church and beautiful reverb on the HOF and I am more than happy
Originally Posted by feet
-
I understand. In my case I don't like subtle reverbs, they tend to ruin your tone more than non-subtle (to me). What setting do you use usually?
Originally Posted by 4thstuning
-
On the HOF I use "Room" with FX and Decay mid-way, Tone around 11 o'clock, and Pre-delay long. My ears are still adjusting to these settings and I'll probably settle on even less in the future. If I ever put new strings on, then there will be even less need for reverb
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
The reason I don't use the long, spacious reverbs is because they mush up the notes when playing fast, whether single lines or rapid chord changes. I don't use distortion for the same reason.
-
I understand, my feelings are the exact opposite. very short room reverbs create a small slapback sound that messes with sustained single-notes. I also don't like too long ambient sounds - I agree that it makes your sound very confusing. There's a sort of middle way that gives a lot of air to your sustained notes and still lets your fast runs perfectly clear, the Church setting with 9 o clock settings allows for just that.
There are plenty of "modern" players who use long reverbs with delay and have perfectly clear sounds on fast runs - one might not like how it sounds but the runs being clear is pretty much factual.
-
I'll try your settings: 9 o'clock for everything right?
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
-
With due respect to Playerizor, these things are a matter of taste. IMO there is a difference between how a really good reverb should sound and how a Fender reverb should sound. But to repeat, no disrespect is intended to Playerizor, and there are certainly others who share his view. Anyway, I went through many reverbs looking for "the one". Here are some choices that I remember:
Originally Posted by Playerizor
Electro-Harmonix Cathedral Stereo Reverb Pedal: I like this one a lot. Small, lightweight, easy to dial in multiple settings and recall the one you want during performance.
DigiTech RV-7 HardWire Stereo Reverb Extreme-Performance Pedal: I remember thinking this pedal was very good and a good value, but I don't remember the details.
Damage Control Glass Nexus: IMO, this pedal serves up to-die-for sounds. It actually offers many effects, but I liked it for its reverb and delay. However, the Glass Nexus has a large footprint, it weighs a ton, and it has been discontinued by the manufacturer, Damage Control, who merged with Strymon. So unless you are looking for a a studio unit and willing to purchase a used copy, this is not for you.
Strymon Bluesky Reverberator: This is the unit I have been using for about two years now I think. I love the tone, and I like it as well or better than anything I have heard, including Fender reverbs. Is is a small, lightweight, digital unit. It has a few nice features, and offers good hall, plate, and room reverbs, which is all I ever want, plus a few other tricks that I don't use. It is expensive, but worth it IMO. To each his own.
-
Just tried! Henriksen head, Dr Z 1x12 closed back cab with EV, Guild X-500 with Church setting everything at 10 o clock (9 was too subtle) and no delay. Liked it a lot... but I think it will be too much for you
Originally Posted by 4thstuning
-
You must have a real Blackface Deluxe before they changed the reverb circuit in the Silverface and later.
Originally Posted by Playerizor
-
Well, I tried it at 9, 10, 11, and 12 the the conclusion is....it's all taste and subjectivity.
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
To me the Church setting has too long a tail, even when I can set the decay and the fx blend. I like a smaller echo so it can get out of the way of subsequent notes. Again, everyone's ears are different.
-
Yeah, diversity is a beautiful thing indeed
-
Some pro players seem to like this one. Trem as well.
-
HoF is all I need.
-
Finally came around to try the "beautiful reverb" toneprint on the HOF today. Like the church setting, it is too fuzzy and over the top for me with too long of a tail. I can see that in certain situations where a not-so-subtle reverb is wanted it would do fine, but for general use it is too much for me- i am just happy with the spring reverb on the HOF. No offense intended to anyone, everybody perceives tone a bit differently.
-
the supernatural is possibly least subtle reverb ever.
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
i get what you're saying, though. it does more... obvious verb settings very well. with some trem you get that great old fender type sound. very nice.
i should add that the dr scientist reverberator also has a neat leslie setting, which basically turns your guitar into a hammond organ. pretty cool, once i figured it out.
so now i have two reverbs that do enough to justify their existence. one springs and spaces, one subtles and organs. i really wish i could squish the two together and sell one off. hopefully a flint might kill them both, but it won't have that neat hammond sound.
but it'll be stereo, at least. am a little scared; the last thing i need is a third reverb i don't want to get rid of. also concerned about having verb and trem in one box with regard to effect order, but i don't think that'll be a huge thing.
-
Originally Posted by Philco
I'm curious about the Strymon Flint as well.
Have any of you used one?
-
Mine arrived today.
I like it and I will admit to having some fairly hi end reverbs for my studio work. Including a hardware TC Electronics M3000 and too many TDM REv plugs to mention. Most of which I paid double what the Strymon cost.
But all that aside is it a good guitar rev?
Yes I like it. I have a reissue Fender Deluxe Rev so the first thing I tried was comparing the Strymon 60s rev with the real (reissued) thing. It's identical.
Except you have more control and it doesn't go "TWAAAAAAANG" when you kick it.
The other 2 revs (70s&80s) are very smooth and I prefer them both to the spring. But that's just my preference.
Decays are nice and smooth.
The Trem is a real added bonus and actually the reason I bought it. Very cool with lots of control.
I didn't know this but if you hold down the 2 switches on boot up, the pedal has a bunch of other features you can mess with.
Download the .pdf here.
http://www.strymon.net/wp-content/up...UserManual.pdf
-
Yeah i always have that fight with reverbs. That's why I also use delay so I don't use massive reverbs... I don't like them too subtle and I don't like them too ambient. The HOF Church and Beautiful at moderate settings give ma all I need.
Originally Posted by feet
I have an EQD dispatch master arriving which is a very small reverb and delay unit. I hope have big hopes for it!
-
No one mentioned Hermida Reverb!
-
It looks like for the money the EH Grail is a good choice,Ill probably go with that.
-
Sure they did. Its chip is from Neunaber and it's a lesser version of the one used in the Neunaber Wet.
Originally Posted by Androo
-
Well so they did! Doh!
Originally Posted by 4thstuning
It's a good pedal for sure. Simple, effective!Last edited by Androo; 10-29-2012 at 05:29 PM.
-
The HOF offers much more for 30 bucks extra imo...
Originally Posted by Top of the Arch!
-
was curious about some of their stuff. looked at the ghost echo and their boosts for a while. ultimately decided against because i wanted separate pedals at the time. on pgs they have some great demos. keep us posted.
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
i'd believe this. the holy grail plus is nice. had one around for years. nothing too fancy, but it gets big enough. its spring and hall were enough for me for years.
Originally Posted by jorgemg1984
-
The EQD arrived today. Tested for for 15m and that's all I can do for now... tomorrow i'll do more.
Now one must know what to expect from a pedal like this. On my main board I have a Flashback and a HOF and I can get any reverb / delay sound I want. The EQD cannot match that but that was not my idea.
In my experience I need reverb and delay to get what I want. People tend to ude reverb as delay and delays as reverb too much - I like a long tail reverb with ver low mix and then delay with low mix too to add trails to the sound.
In my small board I needed one small pedal to do it all. The EQD does it pretty well apparently so... it's what I needed. The reverb is a dark plate and the delay is a dark slightly modulated analog type. It sounds pretty nice and it's killer to take as just one pedal and have all the sound I want - no extra DCs or patch cables.
My only concern was an apparent very slight lack of headroom a stand alone unit. In my board is fine because I cut the signal with the volume pedal before it and boost it after.



Reply With Quote

Recommandations for Hollowbodies for $600 and under?
Today, 05:20 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos