-
Any recommendations on jazz books that talk about motif development for coherent ideas in improvisation?
-
07-18-2023 01:50 PM
-
Mark Levine's Jazz Theory has some relevant material. Helps to be able to read a bit on piano, because that's the way the examples are written out.
-
I recently looked into the dissertation of Kenny Barrons brother Bill and found it really interesting.
-
Some good books out there for sure.
There are some techniques that are fundamental to western classical music and in particular the construction of Sonata Form.
Here's a smattering of some things that can give you a nice feel for motific or thematic development that are the staples of Sonata form:
What is Thematic Transformation in Music?
To define thematic transformation in music, it is important to first define theme in music. A theme, which can also often be referred to as a leitmotif, is a particular melody that helps construct the entire work that surrounds it. A theme consists of the basic constructive features (chords, bass, melody, and phrase structure) along with the elements which help characterize the piece (instrumentation, dynamics, meter, mode, rhythm, tempo, and texture). A leitmotif, especially in the case of works like operas, may include actual words; a theme in music, however, specifically refers to the instrumentals.
Thematic transformation, also known as thematic development, can help a composer demonstrate a shift in the emotional tone of the music in multiple different ways through structural changes in the music.
Thematic Transformation vs. Developing Variation
Musically, there is a difference between thematic transformation and the development of variation in a work. Developing variation often changes a basic constructive feature of a melody and one or more characterizing elements. Thematic transformation, on the other hand, will alter the base melody entirely in some way. Additionally, variation tends to be more ornamental. In other words, it elaborates on the existing melody but does not inherently change the core elements.
Transposition in music refers to the lowering or raising of the pitch by a consistent interval, meaning the relationship between individual notes has not changed even as the pitch has. A work may be transposed to adjust the pitch for the sake of the singer performing the piece. Similarly, a piece may need to be transposed to adjust the work for the addition or substitution of an instrument. The impact transposition has on the music and its reception by the audience will depend on many factors, including whether the pitch was raised or lowered, and which instruments or singers are being added or changed to the piece. For example, a theme played on a flute (high pitch) that is then repeated later on a bassoon (low pitch) will likely result in the audience perceiving an emotional shift from happy and light to more somber and serious.
Modulation
Modulation is a form of transformation where the melody undergoes a key change. Modulation can occur in many forms from very brief changes in key to entire chains of modulation that lead from one starting key and, by the end, to a very distant key.
For a key change, there typically needs to be a pivot-chord, or time within the piece for the shift to occur. Oftentimes this shift will take at least one musical phrase to accomplish.
Inversion
An inversion is the creation of a mirror image of the original melody by having a second musical line move in opposition to the original. In other words, If the original theme goes up, the new line will go down by the same interval. For example, a rise in the original melody would be paired with a fall in its inverted counterpart. Inverted pieces may not retain the same pitch at the start or end of the piece as the original.
_____
_____
Retrograde
Considered another type of inversion, the retrograde form of thematic transformation reverses the melody, like a mirror image created on a vertical axis.
Once you begin to think this way, you can have the structural appreciation of a musical idea, a part of the head, or an idea thrown to you with the ending of the previous solo, a favourite catchy hook or small musical idea that is ripe for development (you'll learn to recognize a good idea, and not to miss the opportunity to extend it or develop it if you choose.) Development process can also include being master of ornamentation (passing notes, approach notes, syncopation, enclosures, exiting notes, truncating a phrase, octave transposition) and all sorts of other great melodic ideas that, once you make them part of your working lexicon, you can use them as part of your own personal vocabulary.
I find it's really helpful for me to listen to music that is thoughtfully organized this way, whether it's Mozart or Sonny Rollins, Bach or Jim Hall. The compositional sensibility is something you bring to the game on your own terms.
A lot of improvisors don't think this way and it's certainly not a necessary ability, but once you can hear it in other composers (including soloists), it becomes a powerful way to build a real work of musical narrative and story in your playing.
It's also really helpful for me to assimilate these approaches a little at a time, and to write small etudes for yourself over changes that are known to you. That's a GREAT way to develop mastery; sharpen your awareness of options, then bring it to the real time realm.
Good for you for being interested!
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
-
"Modern melodic technique" by Gordon Delamont is a book pretty much dedicated to this topic.
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
There are many players who are familiar with the requisite scales, arpeggios and ornamentation and have personal ways in which to order those elements into a multi chorus solo. There are many who take inspiration from the phrases, vocabulary, sounds and internalizations of other players.
As a matter of fact, there are some players who don't use motific development at all.
But this is one strategy that is part of the Western classical legacy which some improvisors employ to a lesser or greater degree.
I hear motific development in the music of Mick Goodrick, Jim Hall, Sonny Rollins, Paul Desmond, Ed Bikert, Fred Hersch, Keith Jarrett, ...well, many more.
Being at least aware of how this is done, being proficient in ear and in hand gives any improvisor a tool that allows for variation, re-statement, structure and compositional integrity that, if you chose, you can use even in small ways, to give substance and body to your ideas.
I teach this to students who come to me and ask "What can I do in my solo besides scales, arpeggios, licks and cool lines I've taken from transcriptions? I run out of ideas and I hit a wall." Techniques of development can be useful in expanding the creative horizon of one's soloing. It can give you ways to shape the structures of phrases, song segments, choruses, solos...in the ways western composers could build a symphony from one three note motif.
One nice example of some of these techniques is the large free form improvisational solo that Keith Jarrett played in his Koln Solo. He can build entire compositional solos from the core of very musical ideas developed. You can also see how he does this in his Standards Trio solo performances. It's one way to develop and highlight an inherent sense of lyricism, building and constructing statement after statement.
In answer though, No, it's not a given and lots of players don't think this way at all. It's just something I like to have in my soloing and something I recognize in some others. It happens to coincide with players I like who employ clarity, brevity, a discernable sense of statement and purposeful narrative.
Some people like that. Some people don't.
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
I posted a few videos where I’m doing this kind of stuff. Not super strict but using a lot of ideas I got from some of the old counterpoint junk I got in college.
In particular post #62.
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
At the other end, there are those who can be inspired by the chord symbols as being a suggestion or guideline from which they can use considerations like linear melody of their own creation, use of contour, use of space, use of contrast, use of repeated notes, considerations of continuitiy, considerations of texture, some internal sense of large scale ordering (I've just created a statement of great harmonic density... I will next create a sense of breath with a following statement that asserts a more breathy portion of a solo, linear shape, angularity vs scale like lyricism, intervallic construction, instrumental form (trills, slides or bends applied to a phrase), ... just for starters.
Intelligent soloing is a combination of technical facility, sense of design and a personal over arcing personal statement. Like language, there is a lexicon, a syntax and some semantic content (something you want to convey).
Of course there's a lot of "go for it and play until you get lost" too, especially in the learning process. You know your abilities, you have a reason to play and you work your whole life until they converge on a true and satisfying reflection of yourself. That's the ideal.
MANY ways to get there.
Learn by listening. THe more you know, the deeper your listening becomes and the more you can craft into your own compositional identity. The more it can be more than craft and become art.
That's one thing I hope for anyway.
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
There are many more excellent ones, but I love his take on understanding not only the theoretical structures but also the stories of the people, times and audiences that shaped the jazz we have today. It's important to recognize just how and why jazz is different from any other music, particularly the responsibiity of the listener to hear, comment, and give back to the experience in a live real time situation.
Knowing about the music, knowing what you're listening to, knowing the choices the performers are making, understanding the collaboration and dynamic nature of creative music is essential to a deep appreciation and an ability to play this music.
For me, the Berliner book speaks to me. I find it a knowledgeable and well researched overview and insightful presentation.
Lots of other books on my shelf but they're packed away for an upcoming move. I liked Joel Harrison's Guitar Talk because it gets to a lot of personal takes on the music and crafts through interviews with the artists themselves.
Enjoy the journey!
-
I think this is an excellent topic that should be covered more. Since there's not much material on it I was forced to figure it out myself through listening and contemplation. I have a short answer for you:
Phrasing: If you listen to the greats solo you'll hear that to phrase, they string together short and long pieces. The short pieces can be between 2-5 or so notes and the longer lines are longer. They'll directly sequence things or develop the pieces more abstractly.
Shape: You need to get material under your fingers to play the changes. Only using the scales isn't very effective for creativity or for accuracy. I discovered that if you practice scales, arps, intervals, and chromatics individually and then combine them creatively into phrases, it results in accurate sounding vocab. This is something that I haven't heard taught and I came up with myself.
There are other topics such as rhythm and rhythmic vocab, but these 2 topics really help.
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy Smith
EDIT: I also really like working with single rhythms. Like steal a rhythm from the melody of the tune, or from a solo I like, and try to improvise with just that rhythm. It’s awkward at first, but eventually you start to get a handle on the kind of collections of pitches that work with the rhythm. Shape and rhythm are inseparable in that way, I think.
-
^ That's terrif. Even more ways to methodically go about creating melody.
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
-
Originally Posted by pauln
But I wouldn’t say classical composers utilize a single set of prescribed rules any more than jazz improvisers do. They all studied in some form or fashion—formally or informally, for a long time or short—but they studied different things in different places at different times. A composer in turn of the century France will be exposed to a totally different array of music and academia than a composer in sixteenth century Italy. And the nature of any composer that is still regarded as a master, 200 or 300 or 400 years after they died, is that they’d be—by definition—wildly innovative and creative.
You won’t find Bach’s counterpoint by looking at any of the rules or texts that existed before. Carlo Gesualdo’s harmony threw rules out the window.
I’m not saying that they didn’t study and I’m not saying that a set of rules derived from their music would be unhelpful. I’m just saying they’d be just that—derived from the music. They’d be as helpful as studying jazz theory is to an improviser who wants to play like Charlie Parker. Helpful, for sure, but not in the way ex post facto analysis can be. It won’t be the source of the magic.
-
Bert Ligon' Connecting Chords With Linear Harmony and Comprehensive Technique for Jazz Musicians are great books that I have found indispensable for creating lines and motifs in soloing.
403 Forbidden
-
Originally Posted by pamosmusic
-
Originally Posted by lukatherknopfler
-
Originally Posted by pauln
Despite what gets taught in many school harmony classes, I get the feeling that real composers learned more by imitating and developing good models than avoiding prohibitions. As Brahms put it, if you have problems with parallels there’s a deeper problem with your harmony. (Lack of variety in sonorities for instance.)
C18 composers as a rule wrote VERY fast, often with little revision or editing. They had to to survive in their professions. They were just very good at doing it. Later on the speed of composition slowed down and composers got a little more careful, but Brahms and so on still had a pretty impressive output, compared to how long it took Boulez to compose a few dozen pieces.
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Originally Posted by Jimmy blue note
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Henriksen Blu 6 w/ gig bag
Today, 03:29 PM in For Sale