-
Originally Posted by Laurence Finston
People like Jon Lord, John Paul Jones and Rick Wakeman had musical educations. The Schumann brothers from Gentle Giant were all sophisticated musicians.
I'm assuming Jimmy Page could read because he played sessions and they surely didn't play the songs for musicians who couldn't read.
Maybe he did? I think I remember hearing he can read but not well, but perhaps I’m remembering wrong.
I think at this point it was in the land of the blind the one eyed man was king. Someone with a rock background who could read a bit would clean up, because most rock players weren’t from that background. Jazzers could read but generationally and culturally they’d always struggle to sound as authentic as our Jimmy.
The Wrecking Crew and Motown were jazz players learning to adapt of the popular music trends of the day; for rock centric players who could read I always feel that’s more Lukather’s generation (and he says that scene was on its way out anyway by the 80s as it was no longer necessary or common to do these highly arranged live room recordings.)
I think I may have heard of some session musician or other who couldn't read music, but was a particularly good soloist, but generally speaking, they had to be good, fast readers.
The big example of a non reading player who could ace all the sessions, even orchestral ones, is Glenn Campbell, whose ears were legendary.
-
01-04-2023 05:59 AM
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
Maybe he did? I think I remember hearing he can read but not well, but perhaps I’m remembering wrong.
I agree that being able to read is a valuable skill. I can read well, including the fancy stuff I've mentioned, but I'd trade it all in a second to be able to play like Erroll Garner, who couldn't read at all.
-
Originally Posted by Laurence Finston
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Originally Posted by Gearhead
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
I may be wrong but it seems that the use of tab in guitar-based popular music can be traced back to acoustic folk-blues guitarist Stefan Grossman. He would regularly visit blues-gospel legend Reverend Gary Davis in the mid '60s for guitar lessons and needed a method to transcribe what his teacher demonstrated (this was before cassette player/recorders were widely available and many reel-to-reel units were too heavy and cumbersome to carry on a bus or train).
Grossman's tabs were idiosyncratic with the fret numbers written in the spaces rather than upon the lines of a staff (maybe he'd come across some older French lute tablature? If so, he decided to adopt the layout but use numbers rather than letter names). Although guitar-based books and magazines from that period often contained chord grids above a conventional staff, I don't recall seeing tab until mid to late '70s editions of Guitar Player magazine (often in articles written by Grossman!).
The following decade is when things really took off. The '80s saw a proliferation of guitar magazines and the arrival of people like Wolf Marshall and Dave Whitehill who turned popular guitar transcribing into a full-time career. One of these magazines (Guitar World?) eventually dropped conventional staff notation completely. A pity really, as I imagine there were some readers who were beginning to make the transition via tab.
-
Eddie Van Halen claimed tab was invented to transcribe his playing.
-
I had no idea he was so old.
-
Originally Posted by PMB
Eddie may have been technically wrong but spiritually correct; to notate the exact finger positions becomes much more critical in an era of shred guitar technique (which often relies on the physical characteristics of the instrument.)
-
Tab is arguably most useful when dealing with altered and open tunings. Speaking of Stefan Grossman, his Kicking Mule label released recordings in the '70s by British acoustic guitarists such as Davy Graham and John Renbourn along with fellow Americans and other European players who regularly retuned their guitars. Many of those recordings came out with accompanying booklets containing tablature transcriptions.
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Originally Posted by KingKong
Why should we read your special notation?
For years guitarists have felt bad about not being able to read music because we fail to decode PIANO TABLATURE onto our own instruments. Look how quickly they laugh at us when we turn the tables!!!!
B*st*rds!!!!!
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
The book is called '....FOR GUITARISTS' though so those damned sax players need to learn how to translate guitar tabs to sax notes.
-
Originally Posted by Christian Miller
There have been many times when I've figured out a guitar part by ear off the record and then I'll see live concert footage and they'll play it differently, like in a completely different position, different picking technique, open strings, etc. So tab can be useful to get ideas for how to technically play things.
I've never been handed a chart with tab and I don't use it very often now. Even if it's there I just ignore it. But when I was just starting out I used it a lot.
-
Originally Posted by Litterick
-
Well, I bought it, and imho it's neither foul nor fish. I guess i had hoped that with the inclusion of tab there would be transcriptions of the actual performance of the melody as recorded by the artist. Not the solo, but at least the head as Cardenas, Sco, McCann, etc play it. But it's bare-bones tab of a lead sheet. Which imho makes the tab superfluous/near useless.
My fault for not researching before buying, but yeah, I'm a bit disappointed in the product.
-
Originally Posted by Average Joe
Last edited by grahambop; 01-11-2023 at 06:29 AM.
Gibson LeGrand Missing Split Diamond Inlay
Today, 11:40 AM in For Sale