-
That was a pretty dumb attitude on their part. Art Pepper recorded this tune at least twice, so he thought it was worth playing. I think I've got a 1980s live version where he plays it on the clarinet - superb. Charlie Parker even played 'White Christmas' (it's on Live at the Royal Roost - I think it was Christmas Eve) and made it sound good.
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
-
07-06-2015 05:21 AM
-
Yeah I know some the NYC cats, sounds like there's a busy scene and not that many players doing that style, apparently there's a shortage of good rhythm guitar players. It doesn't look like it's something that will happen for me, but that's my hot tip if you want to earn some money playing music in New York.... Just make sure you know a few hundred trad and swing numbers and are up for strumming away all night and coin it while 1,000 uber capable Kurt Rosenwinkel wanabees compete for $25 gigs :-).... It might pay for a bed and some lessons with the great and good anyway, I guess...
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
FFS, this kind of thing baffles me. If Stitt, Rollins and Dizzy can do an uber hip rendition of Sunny Side, why can't these guys. Oh wait. Is it because they are incapable of doing anything which isn't scale patterns and have never learned how to actually swing?
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
TBH, I think the divide in the jazz world is increasingly not between trad/modern but actually between historically informed players (including boppers and blue note guys) vs contemporary (non stylistic) guys. The players around now don't remember the trad/modern split in the 1950s, also many of the actual socks and sandals UK trad guys I've met (as opposed to early jazz stylists) are frustrated beboppers anyway haha.
While you can just stick your head in the sand and pretend it's 1925, 1939, 1953 (whatever your year of choice) or spend your time only playing originals and 'advanced reharmonisations' of the ten standards you actually know, this is ultimately a false dichotomy for modern music (look at Miles Okazaki for example, or Ethan Iverson) but for lesser players there's a lot of BS based around justifying what they are doing or latent guilt about what they are not doing. IMO the history of the music (not just Bird, although he is a big deal) is tremendously inspiring for future directions.
Another thing early jazz has done for me is sharpened my dislike for players who run scale patterns on everything with no regard to melody... I think that's just bad playing in any style.
Likewise. I'm finding with my own practice I am now concentrating on harmonic changes playing - which to me is non specific - harmony is harmony. And triads always sound good as mentioned above...
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
I am also working on my general musicianship... Learning 'a style' is much less interesting to me now, but I figure if you are good musician, have checked out the records and can play what you hear, you don't actually need to spend hours learning a style, unless you have a burning desire to the play the guitar exactly as it was played by x in the year y. If you listen before you play, you will play something appropriate for the performance without thinking. This is the dream...
Good idea, I will get around to this if no-one else fancies doing it. Little bit of a project to be sure, so might take a few days.
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
Louis Jordan was coming in on the tail end of Swing, but his best known music was really early R&B, jump blues, heavily influenced by Boogie Woogie and Swing music and so on, not to mention the influence of Charlie Christian's electric revolution which made it possible for small bands to punch above their weight sonically (and spelt the end of the big band era). If you are looking for the missing link on guitar, check out Tiny Grimes (he plays on some early Parker stuff too)... Jordan's a big influence on Gary Bartz don'tchaknow... I reckon Wayne Shorter too haha... Probably many guys of that generation as he was someone you would hear on the radio.Last edited by christianm77; 07-06-2015 at 08:36 AM.
-
Well that's a whole other area (apologies for missing that one out) the Western swing thing is a fascinating fusion of two great American musics...
Originally Posted by dallasblues
-
Art Pepper's rendition of Jazz me Blues is pretty hip. Must check out his recording of Smilin'.
Originally Posted by grahambop
I always like to hear old tunes played by more modern players. If a tunes good it's good. I'm surprised more modern guys don't takle Limehouse Blues - very interesting changes. There's a lot you can do with that harmonically.
The Coltrane/Adderley version is cool..
I think a lot of the rep thing comes down (at least in London) to the fact that a lot of modern players go through music college and learn the same 30-50 tunes which they play all the time on gigs. These are largely culled from the classic core recordings of the '50s - such as the Miles' Prestige albums, for example. But the repertoire of the musicians of that era seemed to include a lot of the older rep - they'd checked out these records.
My favourite record for this is I think Gil Evans, New Bottles, Old Wine....
-
Here are the Art Pepper versions, 1957 and 1981:
Originally Posted by grahambop
-
A lot of players wised up to it lately, actually, or so it seems.. Def. on the Gypsy Jazz scene, which easily crossing into trad swing, I see a lot of young cats trying to break in. I'm not sure there's a shortage of good rhythm players, though, I know a few who are ONLY specialize in rhythm, and refuse to take solos, however strange it seems.
Originally Posted by christianm77
The greatest thing about NYC, you can meet the best of the best, and sit in and jam with them. I go to a hot jazz jam session where guys like Vinny Raniolo, Olli Soikkeli, Stephan Wrembel show up after their gigs and playing almost a whole set sometimes, and you can be sitting with them, exchange solos, playing rhythm, it's a great experience! I feel like that's exactly why moved to live here, just to be in this culture of jazz!
-
I played in two local swing bands here in AZ for several years and had a blast. Mainly rhythm with the occasional solo.
I used my Heritage Sweet 16 with a floater pup and a Carr Rambler for amplification and it worked out well. I stuck with 3 and 4 string comping on the D through E strings and let the bass cover the low end. One band had a piano and the other didn't.
I'm still playing bass with one of them, but the current music director is trying to relive his High School days so we have been doing tons of more modern big band stuff from the 60s and 70s rather than the almost completely 30s and 40s stuff we were playing before. The 60s and 70 stuff usually has a different flavor of rhythm guitar than the classic swing.
Lots of fun and it really helped my sense of rhythm IMHO.
In the classic swing of the 30s and 40s the rhythm guitar is felt rather than heard .... but if it isn't there you will miss it .... IMHO
Interesting about the comment on memorizing 100s of swing tunes .... my bands played entirely from charts ... which made it easy to have 100s of tunes on hands without requireing 13 or 18 musicians to all have the same memorized tunes in their head ... and allowed for subs to step in when needed.
-
That is one thing that I do not quite comprehend - why do we need to recreate the past? Why not play that music and not pretend that it is not 1923 anymore? I am sure that if you took Pat and dropped him into a jam with Kid Ory he would not have any problems making great music without putting on a boater straw hat (would not fit over his mane anyway ;-).
Originally Posted by christianm77
Either way - great post - thank you. I forwarded it to my jam mates - next session we will try "Tin Roof Blues".
-
Great topic.
Woland, I completely agree with you. My passion is pre-Christian guitar playing and I do it on a 7-string.
I am actually in the process of setting up a website dedicated to the pre-swing guitar era called www.jazzageguitar.com . I hope to have it prepped by Xmas. The focus will be on showcasing guitar music of the 20s and early 30s with videos, a blog, and lessons.
-
Because we want Wynton to invite us over for coffee...
Originally Posted by woland
-
Nice!
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
We don't really have any old school jam sessions here in London, which is a shame... That sounds burning. Great to have top people stopping by...
Specialised rhythm players are pretty special.... that said for a small band, many bandleaders do like someone who is a strong soloist.
The biggest difference I think between playing GJ gigs and doing a swing gig is tempos. At least that's the trouble we've had depping swing gigs to GJ players... They tend not to have the medium tempos that the dancers like so much. I don't think there was so much medium back in the day as dancers used to cut the tempo a lot, but these days that's frowned on... It's definitely a separate skill set. Also different repertoire...
-
Originally Posted by Hep To The Jive
Nice!
We don't really have any old school jam sessions here in London, which is a shame... That sounds burning. Great to have top people stopping by.
Specialised rhythm players are pretty popular! That said for a small band, many bandleaders do like someone who is a strong soloist.
The biggest difference I think between playing GJ gigs and doing a swing gig is tempos. At least that's the trouble we've had depping swing gigs to GJ players. They tend not to have the medium tempos that the dancers like so much. I don't think there was so much medium back in the day as dancers used to cut the tempo a lot, but these days that's frowned on... It's definitely a separate skill set. Also different repertoire...
-
Yeah, in my observation, it's easier for a trad/swing jazz guitarist to cross into GJ than the other way. Those who play swing that I know are usually pretty schooled in jazz in general, have more variety and adopt easier to different styles. The GJ players... a lot of them that I met, they pretty cocky toward anything that deviates from their comfortable zone, for them Django is the only God, and nothing else really matters! lol And yeah, they LOVE fast tempos!
Originally Posted by christianm77
Personally, if I play my own gig where I get to choose the tunes, I can't stand playing more than 3 swing, or GJ tunes in a row, no matter what tempo, I just need a break from that rhythm, and change to Latin, Bossa, or New Orleans groove, or whatever... You know what I mean?
-
Yeah the GJ thing is a bit of a strange subculture .... I find it all a bit odd TBH. I have a friend, a sort of escapee GJ guitar player who compared Samois to a Star Trek convention. To be honest, I've never been to any of the big festivals, or hang out in that kind of vibe.... It's a bit to nerdy even for me haha! But I'm sure I'm missing out on hearing some fantastic musicians....
But there are some GJ musicians who are up for transcending it - Stephan Wremble, Sebastian Giniaux etc. I really like these players.
GJ players do have some other feels - Rhumba/Bossa, Bolero, Waltz....
-
I don't really understand this either. This is probably a reason why I won't specialise in this music. It suits a certain type of person.
Originally Posted by woland



Reply With Quote

Charlie Parker Transcriptions
Yesterday, 11:12 PM in The Songs