-
I recently began performing live w/Biab accompaniment using the Jukebox feature. I put a 10 second pause between each song and didn't have to touch my PC at all while playing. This worked great until a week ago when Jukebox began freezing up after the 2nd song causing Biab to crash.
I tried using different songs in the 2nd and 3rd song positions-Jukebox still freezes. I've talked to Biab techs, reloaded the program, etc. but problem hasnt been resolved.
So i'd like to hear from any of you performing live w/Biab about the mechanics you use in playing your song list, pausing between songs, etc. i'm now using the Song feature but this requires a lot of interaction with my PC during the performance which i would like to avoid. thanks.
-
03-05-2010 10:48 PM
-
I don't know the answer to your specific problem. However, as someone who gigs for a living, I think you are taking your musical life in your hands, gigging with a laptop (and probably not the most expensive laptop in the world). They are susceptable to crashes, glitches, power surges, sticky fingers, drunken louts-all those things.
My advice to you is to render your songs to high quality wave files, using the best samples that you have.
Then-buy a minidisk recorder. Record the wave files (either analog or digitally in) to minidisk. There's an autopause/ autocue on good minidisk players--it plays the song and stops at the end of it, cueing up to the start of the next song, ready for you just to hit play.
As a backup, you could render the wave files to DVD or CD. You could then use something like WinAmp's jukebox feature to behave like BIAB's jukebox.
Simply-using a computer program as a live tool is adding risk to your gig, and stopping and starting because of glitches not only looks unprofessional, but worries you, stopping you peerforming at your best.
-
How about using an mp3 player?
-
Originally Posted by billkath
-
Not that i have to explain but......I live in a town of 22,000. There's not an abundance of jazz players here. With Biab, even as imperfect as it is, i've got a bass player, drummer, pianist and various soloists at my disposal. they practice and play when i want them to, work cheap and gladly play the songs i choose.
I've played in a bunch of bands (not jazz) and i'm ready to do something different. My other option would be to play solo which doesn't appeal to me. I use Biab sparingly and most of the soloing is my own.
-
Originally Posted by David Norman
-
Originally Posted by David Norman
-
Your acually playing live with biab?????? What????
And you charge? People pay to hear biab?
You gotta have some serious talkinskills.
I barely practice with biab, becouse I can't stand the sound of it. Is it really that hard to fint some instrumentalists in you'r town?
Try recorded playalongs, like Jamey Aebersold.
Seriously, I would be much to embarrised to play live with baib, I think you would be much better of using recorded material.
Any instrument would be better allso. Find a rock-drummer an bass-player and convince him/her that playing jazz would be fun. Maby use a nother guitarist insted of a pianoplayer - be creative - just find somebodey to play with, thats what jazz is anyway, playing together.
Or move to a new town?
-
I barely practice with biab, becouse I can't stand the sound of it.
-
Originally Posted by adamreir
-
Originally Posted by FatJeff
Originally Posted by billkath
But seriously, biab live. It's programmed midi. Jazz? Live?
What happen to playing together, or even the eutentic sound of a real comp. People playing instruments.
I understand practicing with it, I understand playing for friends/Family with it, but for an audience. Jazz is about improvizing. Not programing.
If it's the last shot, no other possibilities, ok, do it. But atlest check out Aebersold. It is world class musicians playing their instruments. playing dynamic music.
And, please, try to find somebody if you are supposed to perform live. It's much better, and you'll probably learn a lot from it aswell
-
The 2009/2010 versions have allowed replacing the MIDI sounds with real recorded instruments. The difference is really quite amazing. I used to hate playing along with BiAB too, because I don't like the sound of MIDI, but the new real tracks really do sound great and I love playing with it now. And I would gig with it too for casual gigs (e.g. Sunday brunches, cheesy lounge happy hours, etc.) Remember that not all gigs pay enough to support 3 or more band members, and not all venues have room for more than a single person playing.
-
Wow, so it plays samples now? Thats great, gotta check it out.
Ok. For Gigs that aren't serious, like playing at the lokal bookstore or anything. Where it really isn't space enough. Maby it's OK. Allthoug I'd rather just play a duet with somebody, or just solo.
My piont is really that playing together, the musical relationship between the soloist, rest of the band and the audience is really a big part of the whole jazz-concept. having fellow musicians compliment you while you solo, follow you, letting the music go the direction you want it to go, practice together (4 heads really thinks better then one + computer), rescu u when your lost, someone to put you in rehab when your down and out etc.
Playing with recorded / programmed material really limits the music. I mean, If you play with a machine / recording you have to follow the band, becouse the band won't follow you.
The greate pleasure with good jazz is when you can hear a musical element travel from one instrument to another, band complimenting melody/solo, followin the soloist.
Remember, the soloist is never the only person improvising, the whole band is improvising.
If you want to play live with biab, OK. But serious, it sucks. It's a compromize a can never do, atleast not charge somebody for.
It would be like playing on a guitar without strings. Ok, you can make it an perk. instrument, but it won't be playing guitar.
-
Just checked it out on youtube. And i agree, it doues sound great. But live?
* Hey I'm playing a liveshow today, wanna come?... Wait, i use Band in abox, thats not live is it? Eeeem, I play a deadshow tonight, wanna come?
-
For those of you who have not experienced BIAB 2009/2010, giving your opinion on this subject is like criticizing a book you have never read. This type of argument does not work for me. Also, many of us do not live in or near a big enough city to have access to other musicians so if we want to play, we have to do the best we can with the assets we have for our circumstance. I would love to play with a 4, 5, or whatever size music group but I guarantee, especially in this difficult economy, I would not be able to work where I live. My wife and I often work duo and trio gigs but if the gig requires dance music, BIAB makes our music more danceable. On the rare occasions when a bass player or drummer comes into our small town (very rare here), we alway try to be totally "live" with our performance. We prefer to play with other musicians but can't always find them.
wiz
-
I agree.
Lads (and lassies)--I don't know what gigs are like where you are from, or perhaps you play because you love it and would play for next to nothing? People like myself, and I dare say quite a few here, make their money from gigging-it's their job.
Even in the city, money is a problem for pubs, clubs and restaurants. There is a massive recession on, and customer numbers are down. They have budgets. They can only afford a certain amount of money for entertainment on "normal" nights.
Now-those of us who do gig are not going to go out and play for ,say, 75 or 100 bucks. The clubs can only afford, say, 300-400 tops. I wouldn't get out of bed for less than 200-0 we all have bills. So-do you go in as a trio or duo? Some do (those that have day jobs as well), but with a good backing behind you, you can do the job, entertain the crowd and make the most money as a solo act. The pubs and clubs don't care, as long as you are a brilliant entertainer and the punters are happy. The punters, in general, are not caring what bloody mode you are playing in, or any of these technical things so many here seem so obsessed with. They just care about having a great night out, a few beers, some good music and good company. We're talking about gigs-not concerts. Where there is little or no cover charge on the door, where you stand up if you can't find a seat?
Those who think "yeah-but it's too restricting, playing to backing" are just not experienced in live work. Yes, it might be, to amateurs. But to a professional-you write your backing to suit you. You write it in such a way as to make it sound live, with all the little pickups,tempo changes, medleys and bits and pieces a live band would do. You play as if you were live, and bounce off the crowd, not your bandmates. And you talk to the crowd. And you have a couple of hundred songs that you know backwards-you rehearse to make it as exciting as you can, and to make it appear live. It's your stagecraft that fools the audience. Lads-we are not talking about playing to standard midi files or boring arrangements here. It's hard work-your concentration levels and your musicianship have to be absolutely spot on-all night, every night.
We can talk about "ideal" all day long-we'd all love to be playing in our perfect band. I'd love to be playing every night with a big band. But-we have to be practical. So- When the money is there (corporate gigs etc, where we are getting paid 3-4 grand) then we put together a 5 or 6 piece band. Smaller gigs (say 900-1200)-like parties-maybe a trio. Small clubs (budget of 350-400, plus drinks)- I do a sax and guitar duo to backing tracks. And for little pubs on a tight budget- solo- to tracks. And I have to sing all the songs and do all the solos as well!!
There is only one thing that's important-that you entertain the crowd. If you don't, you are playing for yourself, and that's not a gig. It's practice, or showing off. And here, or in the UK, you'd not be asked back.
-
Very well stated, Bill. Your comments are the reality of many musician's approach to being a practical performer. Thank you! Also, being a musician is more than performance. IE, I must write ALL of the arrangements, intro's, endings, song selection, # of chorusus, tempo's, key centers, etc, etc...., for everything we do with BIAB. My trio does not use ANY midi tracks and the real tracks that we use are ONLY bass & drums for backup for each song. BIAB 2010 has over 7000 different styles to choose from so we have a lot of variety in our song choices. Usually, after the crowd thins out, we are free to play a more intimate approach to our music and we shut the computer off and just play for our own pleasure.
wizLast edited by wizard3739; 03-07-2010 at 11:53 AM.
-
I think of the issue as playing LIVE in real time in a SOLO setting, and configuring your set up accordingly. In a non-jazz setting, Robert Fripp has been the master of this with his "Frippertronics" and "Soundscapes".
In a jazz setting, a world class trombonist recently noted that he has started using a loop pedal and laptop setup, and he is really excited by this.
BIAB? Meh. Cheesy, cheesy, cheesy! You can do much better. There is some really cool stuff out there, in terms of rig configuration, that will allow you to play live, in real time, creatively, with enhanced sounds. I have a MacBook Pro and something called MainStage Live. Which takes some time to get used to and learn. I'm gonna try to master it as one of my goals for 2010.
Not nearly as complicated as Fripp's setup, which includes MIDI pickups, the totality of which he calls "The Solar Voyager".
-
The way I use BIAB is-it lets you put in your basic chord progressions very easily, and gives you a head start. From there-I bring it into my sequencer (Sonar) and start adapting it-changing basslines, adding in drum fills and ghost notes, swapping in drum patterns etc. I then use really good samples of the instruments-great brush and jazz drums, upright basses and a really classy jazz upright piano, and mix down to a stereo wave. I then master the wave file, so that all backing tracks will have the same average volumes and the same EQ curve etc-so it sounds like it was all recorded by one band, in one room. That is SO much quicker than sequencing a backing track from scratch. When I'm doing a solo or duo (sax and guitar) gig I use Bass, Drums and piano as our backing. No strings, no solo pianos, brass bits or rhythm guitar etc-as simple as can be. That way, we stay true to ourselves, I feel-we're doing all the stuff that should be done by us.
So-is it as good as a live band? No-of course not. But it is acceptable for around the pubs and clubs. We want people to go home saying-"What a good Sax or Guitarist" or "Jeez, I loved those songs- brought me right back", not even THINKING about what the backing tracks added.
Of course-you'll always get the odd muso, asking about what you are using. If the tracks are good enough, they'll be looking to do it themselves, as they know what the score is. 99% of them say "Man-it really freed you up to play, didn't it?"
Play with bad tracks, however, and they'll be telling you what you SHOULD be using. And that means you were crap.
-
Don't have time to read everything right now. So ok, it sound much better, but still it isn't "live", you'r not playing with real musicions. I agree, Karaoke is a good term for playing live with a recording or whatever: Jazzkaraoke.
From a musical perspective it's like playing football in a weelchair.
From a working 'I have to earn money' perspective, i gess its ok. You'r arguments for using biab box live are all about earning money,and not having anybody to play with. OK, but playing with biab is not good, what every you'r arguments are.
Jazz is not about making money, Jazz is not about making the audiences dance (so that you can earn money). Jazz is about the music, improvisation, playing, playing together.
Biab is not Jazz, it imitates jazz, nothing more.
I agree, virtual jazz, that's is.
Ok use it live, earn you'r money, I see you'r point. But musically, nono.
-
Originally Posted by adamreir
The ideals of jazz are lofty, quite admirable, and worthy of pursuit, but you gotta eat.
-
Interesting posts...
Some are being practical and are in favor of BIAB.
Others are being idealistic and are against BIAB.
It's easy to be idealistic if your a big name jazz performer in a good market.
It's also easy to be idealistic if you don't gig at all or you make very little performing jazz and don't depend on the money.
To those of you (CosmicGumbo, Adamrier) that are being idealistic and holding out for the art of jazz, how about posting some of your music so we can have a listen.Last edited by fep; 03-09-2010 at 02:25 PM.
-
Furthermore, if I only had two choices: (1) play jazz using BiaB for an audience; (2) don't play because I'm holding out to play with a group; I'd have to choose (1). I'd rather play than not play.
Which action does more harm to the future of jazz? I'd rather get out there and let people hear jazz (in any context) rather than continue to let my beloved art form wither and die because it's no longer in the mindset of listeners.
-
Originally Posted by fep
My main beef in this thread is with guys who post from their lofty silver thrones and claim that anything that doens't fit their narrowly defined criteria for "what is proper jazz" is to be cast aside without so much as a listen. What arrogance. Any musician who is making a living playing this kind of music - whether they're doing it solo, with some kind of accompanying system, or in a 17-piece big band - is to be commended. They're living it, instead of bashing it from the sidelines. And as long as their audiences are enjoying the fruits of their labor, isn't that kind of the whole point?
I'll tell you what the point is not: it's not about pleasing the jazz purists with every song. 99% of the people who would go hear this particular kind of playing are eating their jazz brunches with their girlfriends and wives, getting faced on Ramos Fizzes...they don't give a rat's a$$ if the nice sounds coming from the stage are generated by machines, or recordings of real musicians, or actual musicians playing live. They just want to hear some melodic jazz, and then go home and take a nap.
If you took this kind of logic to its extreme, one would expect that the same posters would decry the use of amplification for jazz guitars. Or any kind of effects processing, like chorus or reverb or pre-amp devices. Hey, that's not the sound of a REAL LIVE MUSICIAN! That's a Roland pedal doing all that!
Anyway, BiAB is about as good as it gets for accompanying as far as I'm concerned. And this includes the Aebersold material, much of which is crap IMNSHO, as well as playing with actual so-so musicians. And just because you heard BiAB 3 years ago played through some crummy PC speakers doesn't mean that you know what it sounds like now. Once again I encourage those who dismiss BiAB to give it a listen with the RealTracks. They're really quite good.
-
Originally Posted by FatJeff
I agree wholeheartedly. I just retired and am looking to stay busy playing locally-restaurants mostly. I'm learnings tunes that for the most part will be at least somewhat familiar to the folks i play for. Hopefully, i'll be creative enough to make them good solid tunes that i enjoy also.
The Aebersold tracks are fixed arrangements-with Biab i can determine length, key and add a RealTrack solo or 2 if i feel it's needed. Can also program in shots, rests, key changes, etc.
Also, thanks to BillKath for suggesting i give up Biab for playback. I converted all my Biab backing tracks to WAV files and am using Window Media Player to play them. When you convert files to WAV files from Biab, it allows you to put a pause in the front and back of songs so i've got a 5 second space to catch a breath. So far, this setup is working fine. I tried to attach a couple of the backing tracks i created for the Biab haters to enjoy but this forum doesn't allow attaching WAV files.
Thanks to everyone for your input.
Mental check on buying a good guitar
Today, 10:38 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos