-
Musescore apparently makes everything huge on newer machines? I mean, it's basically unusable for me now.
I did some searching and found multiple threads worth of people complaining about this over months/years, only to be blamed by the developers for using windows, or for having screens with modern higher resolutions.
There is a lot of instruction on how to implement complicated workarounds, using command line prompts to execute musescore in a different way etc. I have been a pretty big fan and promoter of this software, but I really don't have a lot of patience for something being so difficult to use on a new computer, all while blaming the end user for not being able to do "simple workarounds" which basically equate to entry-level computer programming.
Maybe I'm missing something?Last edited by matt.guitarteacher; 03-08-2020 at 04:37 PM.
-
03-08-2020 04:16 PM
-
Interesting. Apparently they've actually hired tantacrul, who made the scathing video Christian linked above.
-
Ha. Imagine Sibelius doing that.
-
After all of my whining in the previous post, I've been checking else the newest updated version, and they have really done some work with the former muse score critic at the helm. Pretty impressive. Of course, I never figured out how to actually permanently change the default size parameters. I ended up just going back to a previous file and saving it as a template.
Anyway, I think they have made some serious strides in a pretty short time.
-
Finale comes with Garritan instruments, beautiful samples in classical, jazz and pop styles of playing and recording. Every upgrade adds more instruments, including Indian and Middle Eastern, Chinese and Japanese, African and Far Eastern, etc. Great for movie scoring, for sure, but very nice for hearing your big band or multi-horn arrangements as they should sound live. Used to be a steep learning curve, but now it's pretty easy to use.
-
Hi, all. I hope that all are well. I am trying out Musescore once, and I am beginning to see the strong side of it. However, one feature I still have not found is to add a chord by name instead of entering the voicing note by note. Is that possible? Suggestions will be appreciated.
-
Originally Posted by teeps
If you aren't concerned about playback, above the note or rest that is currently active you can add a chord symbol by hitting ctrl k.
-
Hi fep, Thank you very much.
-
I'd been using Lilypond because I come from a universe that uses a text-based system called LaTeX for math. However it takes quite a bit of fiddling to get things right. This weekend I decided to try out Sibelius, but was immediately turned off the all too familiar "register/get a license/have some thing running in the background/buy this additional thing". For some reason, lots of music software uses this model, which I assume the companies were driven to by piracy. But I wonder why music software seems particularly like this - I suppose they found that they'd sell more at a lower price, but with other controls.
Anyway, speaking of Musescore, I installed it, and actually like it better so far, for my admittedly minimal need, which is to do lead sheets. Keyboard-only entry is important for me, and that works fine. The only thing I miss is the ability to play back with chords (without having to enter each note). Even just having a totally standard voicing would be fine, and those notes can certainly be generated from the chord name.
-
I bought a Macintosh in 1984 because Mark of the Unicorn was promising a professional engraving program. My handwritten scores have always been impossible to read, so this was a holy grail for me. Of course, in 1984, Composer was vaporware, but it wasn't long before it was a reality, and I could actually print my scores on the Imagewriter – such a difference!
Mark of the Unicorn's Composer became Mosaic, and then it was orphaned. Scores created in Mosaic could not (and cannot) be opened by any other program – if they weren't saved as PDFs or printed out, they might as well not exist. I must confess to having some music I composed in Mosaic currently unavailable to me. Not really consequential, but unfortunate for me.
Then I went with the crazy expensive and complicated Finale, which when it first came out had a gigantic manual of what, 3 or 4 bible-sized books? A long slog to learn, which soon was eclipsed by Sibelius, which had a competitive upgrade. So I bought it, and had another long slog of learning to go through. Then a newer Finale update had some improvements on Sibelius, so I paid for an update.
These days I am retired with a fixed income, and mostly just do lead sheets and charts. I discovered Musescore several years ago, and it does everything I need it to do. I gratefully deleted all those gigabytes of midi instruments crowding my hard drive, especially since I have other, better ones I use (software synths for Kontakt and virtual modeling synths like SWAM) when I need to record music with closer-to-real sounds. I don't need great sounds in Musescore, since I only need to make sure I have written what I'm hearing.
I really enjoy the jazz font – it makes a printed lead sheet look great. I wish Musescore could play the chord names I add above the staff, but I'm grateful that the jazz shorthand for chord names is recognizable. The creative team has been working on getting the chord names to play, but they are apparently stymied by how the chords should sound – e.g., how the software chooses which inversion of a particular chord would be right. So for now, to test the chords I input without getting out my guitar, I create a new file in iReal Pro and type in the chords there, which also serves to check the names I give to the chords.
I found the learning curve for Musescore to be easier than the others. Basic note input is fairly intuitive (for a computer program, anyway), and I just looked up answers to questions I had as I went along (DuckDuckGo, not Google, thank you very much).
I think it is so amazing that the team hired its most public critic to redesign the program – that is true humility.
Oh – and by the way, anyone who has used Lilypond could rightfully be said to have mastered the most difficult music software in existence. I am in awe (I gave it a try)...
-
Still learning.
For guitar specfic work Tuxguitar (.:: TuxGuitar ::. Open Source Tablature Editor :: TuxGuitar) might be better equipped with tools such as hammer-on/pull-off/bend-up/prebend-release/vibrato/tremolo(whammy)/muting and alike.
For screen and printout appearance Musescore seems ahead. But that might have improved in the newer version of Tuxguitar.
For compatibility the MIDI in/out is a must (and both Musescore and Tuxguitar supports it) and import/export of various formats is nice, but some details always have to be edited.
-
I'm going to update my Musescore review.
Now that VirusTime is here, I decided to use Musescore to make full band tracks, some for octet some for quintet.
This refers to writing out every note for every instrument, including drums, and then using Musescore's playback -- which plays back facsimiles of each instrument. So, it sort of sounds like a band. Yes, there's a mechanical quality.
Then, you can print out parts for each player. I even found a way to print a lead sheet with extra staves where I needed to communicate something, but with the rest of the part for that instrument hidden.
Everything has worked pretty smoothly.
It's frozen up a time or two, but autosaved everything often enough that I don't think I lost a note.
So, some friends and I are making recordings. I used Musescore to create a full band "reference track". Players can ask for music-minus-one if they want that. Then everybody plays along with the track while reading the chart. Musescore "exports" mp3, pdf and other formats. So, you can get an audio file and the chart of that music. Works great and it's free.
-
Might give it another go now Tantacrul is involved... Sibelius is massively annoying of course haha. (But it works if you know what you are doing. Musecore at the point I used it had too many weird quirks.)
-
What is the easiest score writing software to learn ?
only need to write lead sheets with chords on top
I'd like to do it all with the mouse if possible .....
(i don't like keyboard shortcuts much , can't remember them)
I need a very shallow learning curve if possible ....
and export to PDFs
cheers
-
Originally Posted by pingu
I think Musescore is easier. I did appreciate the old fashioned paper manual I got with G7 back then, maybe 14 years ago.
I think that having used G7 made Musescore much easier to learn.
Mostly, once you grasp how it's organized (it's the palettes and styles) it's pretty easy. You can do it with mouse input, I guess, but I've found it easier to type note names. You click the icon for the note value you want, and type the note. You have to be in the right "mode", or something, for it to do what you want, which has me irritablly pounding the escape key pretty often, but, otoy, when I've needed to learn to do something it's never taken more than a few seconds. Either my guess is correct or I get the answer with Google, always quickly.
Lead sheets are pretty simple. I've done scores for 8 pieces. Mostly pretty easy, although I've had to spend time changing the numbers of bars per line, which should be automatic, but doesn't always do what I want.
So, I'd rate Musescore ahead of my experience with G7, even though Musescore is free.
I can't comment about full Sibelius, Dorico, Finale or others.
-
Originally Posted by pingu
BUT.....if I only wanted to do lead sheets, I might want to check out good ol' Bob Keller's free Impro-Visor program. Nobody talks much about this software, but it seems like a fairly capable notation program and Band-in-a box substitute.
<b>"Write the solo that you'd love to be able to improvise."</b>
Impro-Visor A Free Music Accompaniment Program
Impro-Visor - Wikipedia
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
Thanks, cg, for the heads up about Bob Keller's Impro-Visor. I didn't realize how easy it made lead sheet production.
-
I really struggle with people knocking musecore, it's not free, it is ABSOLUTELY FREE.
all the sounds are generated sfs files which are basically soundfonts they come preloaded in what vers of Musecore., this is similar to midi in the sense
you get GM general midi, my words here Proprietary midi. GS and Roland stuff which are supposed betters sample etc
This simple means if you are unhappy with Musecore you can import or replace your entire Sounds, or say you want a specif Jazz guitar sound or bass oboe so on so forth you can do it.
Transposition has always worked flawlessly for me, Perhaps some things not so great on Mac, and Vice versa.
It is a small team of people from (what i know) you can talk to them directly on the forum, they are very very up and precise.
I have no affiliation but cant believe just good Musecore is
However i will say this i prefer the slightly old version 2.3 etc not Musecore 3 but its hard to evaluate. because i changed to Windows 64b 10 Pro on a new laptop, from Windows 64b 7 Ultimate on older laptop.
My advice is to anyone new definitely give it a whirl, i sense that sibelius users also want their features in it, i think this is true across most software platforms.
But again its free, it something is missing ask on the forum, they always discuss the ramifications of introducing new features or possible problem in doing so etc
-
I’m not having a go at it. In many ways it’s much better designed than Sibelius. But it felt like I was using an early Beta, not version 2 or 3.
I’ll check in now a year has gone by. Sounds like improvements being made very steadily.
-
Originally Posted by Ukena
The bars per line thing -- I can get the conductor's score right and then have to adjust each one of the component parts individually to get the same number of bars on every line. Is there a way around that?
-
I've been glued to MuseScore 3.0 for the last month. I've churned out three scores for 18 piece big bands in a few weeks, and am currently working on a fourth.
My only trouble is that I can't hear the trumpets on the playback. I've tried everything I could with the mixer and dynamic markings, but they're barely there.
-
Originally Posted by sgcim
I ended up changing the trumpet to harmonica. That worked for the tune, but I didn't figure out the problem.
OTOH, trumpets are so loud live that maybe this was a refreshing change.
-
Originally Posted by teeps
Hi teeps sorry if this sounds rude (its not) what do you mean by ( add a chord by name instead of entering the voicing note by note. )
i end up edditing chords i have pulled in say from a midi file, a real pain, so do you mean you kind of press/click a button it adds say CMaj7 for example, what about the specific voicing, in relation to what precedes that chord and what follows.
-
this may be just me i used Musescore 2XXX for about 2 years i changed to Musecore 3 i find it gunkier, it has more bells etc things like the mixer i compose with sometimes 20+ tracks new mixer weird, tried to adjust setting, could be me
Also in Musecore 3 the input function ( i cant describe properly il try) It has N function relating to real time or step time, so when you say enter a note on the staff, you cant enter another untill you do something, ( i never quite certain what it is ) so basically after entering each note you need to go in and press or disable something.
Musecore 2.3 never had this, anyone else had/hasve this problem, or anyone understand what im trying to get at.
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
I gave up on that and finished the chart. I had to transpose the entire thing, because some of the instruments were out of their range, but I just remembered that I have to go back and put the saxes and trumpets in their written key, but it should be correct because I followed the concert ranges.
Home, guitar playing and travel
Today, 06:11 PM in Everything Else