Originally Posted by
John A.
Smith said something a little different from that -- he said he didn't consider himself to be a jazz player because, not that his music wasn't jazz (some of which was and some of which was not). Here's a quote to that effect:
“I was involved in so many different types of music over my career, so I never could consider myself a jazz guitar player. You know, the great jazz players, they’re just involved with jazz. And I think to excel in something you do have to give it full attention. Furthermore, I was never much of a jam-session guitarist. Everything I did was done with a definite outline, especially for harmony. It wasn’t my idea that I was categorized as a jazz player; that was the record company’s idea. I’m a guitar player, and I consider myself a musician who can improvise a little bit. That doesn’t make me a jazz player, like a totally dedicated jazz player like Jimmy Raney. Some people say I’m being facetious by not categorizing myself as a jazz player, but that’s how I honestly feel.”
I can hear this in Smith's music. For instance the contrast between him and Getz is pretty stark (in a good way, but definitely a different harmonic and rhythmic concept), whereas Getz and Raney seem much more to be occupants of the same universe.
Moffa Mithra
Today, 08:31 AM in For Sale