-
Originally Posted by Jonah
It’s easier to work with what I already have and expand it. It takes a lot of time
- decades even - to learn this stuff, much more than picking technique IMO
But I aim for a mobile left hand and aim
to play more in lower positions. It sounds better most of the time.
I personally played a lot in 'position' but there was a period when I intentionally broke it and began to study the neck diagonally... and eventually I got some kind of mixture of it.
An interesting excersise that Andrey Ryabov showed me: when you play a scale or an arp upside down... you move your hand from top frets to low frets but the arp or scale goes upwards...
it really breaks some patterns and the way the fretboard is systemized.
I actually think it is an endless trip... I feel like my mapping of fretboard is always changing and it becomes more and more multi-dimensional.... but I dont fell like I will ever say: I know it...
-
03-11-2021 06:00 AM
-
Originally Posted by Eck
I think everything is possible.. I just woudl not really overestimate the importance of it.
Probably this is important from point of view of pedagogy.
Actually when I play serious challenging music on lutes I am extremely specific about fingereings on both hands...
up to every single note.
-
I see what we're referring to as reg's fingerings as just... a way to learn the entire fretboard. It's a road to rpjazzguitar's summit, but I haven't gotten there yet.
-
yea... I know I've said this for years... but many just get lost in the forrest.
The 1st or starting point.... you need to know yourself. You need to know how you work, both physically and mentally.
Then decide what you want and where you want to go.
If you don't know or have difficulty figuring yourself out.... get some help.
Generally this basic info. will help you make choices as to how your going to learn and play the guitar.
I went through this BS back when I was a kid in school. And decided on how I wanted to play the guitar and designed my approach from those decisions. You can obviously make changes as you go.
It's really easy to know if what your doing or using works... We're on a jazz Forum. so I'm taking it that most want to play Jazz Guitar. Anyway... how does your approach work in live performance ?
Anything will work with rehearsal...
-
I'm neither a psychologist or neurologist but it seems to me that what happens live & extemporaneously is directly correlated to what we've drilled in, and that is true with either simple or complex material.
We're all human after all.
-
Originally Posted by christianm77
In Four On Six, Wes plays a descending idea in four keys. When I first tried to play it, with four fingers, it was really hard, Eventually, I found a way (which I suspect he used) to play it with two fingers -- in each of four positions. Easier and sounds way better.
I can't stop myself from using 4 fingers. Habits are too engrained. Those fingers often play what's convenient outside of my conscious control and I have to remind myself to take charge.
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
But I think it’s true that none of those players I listed I associate much with straight scalar runs up and down.
One good example of a guitarist who plays very much this way with lots of scales is Kurt Rosenwinkel. As I understand Kurts technique has changed quite a bit recently, moving to a much more 3 fingered style.
What it boils down to is - would you rather stretch or shift? In Kurts case the stretching was causing him hand problems apparently. Honestly I think shifting is often the best policy in melody playing.
-
Originally Posted by christianm77
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
-
Originally Posted by Lobomov
Suppose you want to play C Ionian starting on the 8th fret of the low E string with your fourth finger. Your first finger is at the 5th fret. All the notes are right under your fingers except B.
Now, suppose you want to finger those notes with 3 fingers. If you play the low C with your third finger, you have to stretch, or reposition, for the D. Then, if you repositioned your hand for the D, you have to stretch or reposition for the F. That puts your first finger at the 6th fret (under the one finger per fret rule) and the next note is at the 5th fret. More stretching or movement.
So, my thought is that if you have to stretch and move that much more, you may be less likely to play all those notes. And, if you leave some out, that can be a very good thing, making your lines sound less like scales.Last edited by rpjazzguitar; 03-11-2021 at 07:57 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Lobomov
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
Yeah that’s hard to do that. Makes sense.
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
Playing a c-major scale staring on the 8 fret of the low e-string requires a wee bit of strecthing, and a slight reposition, but it's pretty natural and not big deal.
You go 3rd finger on e then 1st, 2nd and 3rd there after ... the only place where you have slight inconvenience is not the hitting the D on the A-string, but hitting the B on the G-string if you intent to make a 2 octave run. Plenty of players play like this and at great speeds.
We are talking this pattern right?
And yes ... 3 fingers, no pinky! .. Also hand as far as possible angled at a 45 (or even less) degree to the fretboard and not the classical position where it's angled at 90 degrees (in other words where your fingers are pointing straight at the ceiling)
-
Hmmm.
That's just a CAGED fingering pattern, position V. It includes a shift to position IV on the 3rd string. No stretches involved.
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
Are we locked into fingerings with stretches here? .. I was just replying as a general comment on 3 vs. 4 finger playing when playing scales .. I have a hard time finding examples where 3 fingers fall short.
-
I'm sure not locked into stretch fingerings, I prefer to avoid them when playing in low and middle positions on my 25.5" scale guitars.
I'm not sure what you're referring to on the 3 vs. 4 fingers discussion (but that's OK).
Are you referring to the use of up to 3 fingers (any 3 fingers) on each string? Or are you referring to the general avoidance of 4th finger use?
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
I was talking about no-pinkie. But, I'm aware that great guitar has been played without pinkie, Wes being a great example.
In thinking about that fingering, a way to avoid any stretching is to play the A note on the D string with the pinkie. That's doable at high speed without difficulty and eliminates any stretching to get the B note at the 4th fret. I think most players don't bother with this because it's not hard to play the B with stretching or repositioning, but it is an efficient fingering.
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
Playing the A on the 4th string with the pinky is indeed doable and kind of reminds me of some classical fingering moves. That too is a shift to the 4th position, so when the 3rd string is reached you are already there (in 4th position, that is).
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
I recall Chuck Wayne's patterns as similar.
I also recall being taught stretching back to a lower fret at some point.
I discovered for myself, much later, that I could stop being cognitively rigid about my left hand being in a position. At that point, I realized that moving it, even just a little, avoiding discomfort and could be smootly executed at my idea of high speed, which ain't that fast.
As far as I know, Warren played out of these seven positions a great deal. I think that his knowledge of the neck and where to find the notes he wanted was based on these patterns along with big ears and experience. He could barely read a note. When he tried, invariably he played at the nut like a beginner. I'm guessing that he did not know the notes on the fingerboard by name except down at the nut. I could be wrong. While that isn't necessarily my recipe for success, Warren was a brilliant, innovative player. He had developed a lot of his own methodology and it worked for his music, perfectly. He's known for his jackhammer approach to soloing, but he was also brilliant at chord melody and every time he played a song he'd do it completely differently.
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
Yeah he had big chops and a good ear. Did you study with him? That must have been cool if so.
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
-
Originally Posted by Donplaysguitar
- on strings 6 and 5, there is stretch btw index and middle
- on string 4, you can play without stretching, fingers 1 and 3.
- on string 3, you shift position one fret lower and have stretch btw middle and ring finger.
- on string 2, you shift back to original position and have stretch btw middle and ring finger.
- on string one there is stretch btw index and middle.
My Band camp
-
If you define "shifting" as a hand move that also moves the thumb position,
and if you define "stretching" as a finger moving outside the hand position,
then you don't need to do either if you fix thumb position and move the hand.
Doing so lets each finger span 5 frets, so the whole hand may span 8 frets.
The hand moves so different fingers move opposite the fixed thumb as needed.
Thumb is fixed, until you move it (you can move it in advance of a hand shift).
If that seems like unreachable span, reduce it to 3 frets for fingers and 6 for hand.
-
Yes... and generally we never stay in one position anyway.
Elias Prinz -- young talent from Munich
Yesterday, 10:24 PM in The Players