-
Originally Posted by rodite135
From what I've read Pat pretty much self taught being guitar was his rebellion from his trumpet playing family. Also Pat became obsessed with guitar and his grades got so bad in school his parents took his guitar away for a semester. Which Pat says helped because he just practiced guitar in his head and probably spent even more time thinking about guitar than when he had his physical one.
I'd like to know more about his time at Berklee, everyone says he went, but no one talks about how he did. Great time to be at Berklee then Metheny, Scofield, Stern, Frissell, Juris, and others all around the same time.
-
11-20-2014 06:52 PM
-
Originally Posted by 3625
"blah blah blah REAL PLAYER blah blah blah JAZZ NERDS blah blah blah DOESN'T HAVE GOOD TIME"
-
If you transcribe Metheny's solos he uses many of the bop principles just differently. As does Kurt Rosenwinkle. I think his inner voice is just his own. You can learn a lot from his choices about incorporating your own thing inside the bop jazz thing. At the end of the day it's all about that. But I agree if you first want the bop sound you can't really start with Pat. The theory's dead on but the approach is all his own. Same a Kurt. Cats seem to forget you have to crawl before you walk. When I listen to Gilad or Rotem that's what I hear. Same bop principles just a new take. I don't believe you have to start transcribing Charlie Christian first but picking a bop player that sounds like what you "think" is a jazz guitar "sound" then you work out. Cause it isn't effects that makes that sound at it's core. No better example than Kriesburg. Total bop language played though his own experience with the guitar. All the great players have the foundation.
-
Originally Posted by rodite135
-
after observing metheny's later work, gotta agree with what someone said, definitely picks more than you would think. Same with Kurt, and believe it or not, with Allan Holdsworth as well (for most his melodic lines, not the obvious uber-shred stuff). It's the balance in their right hand, which allows for them to achieve an even level of tone across the board (corollary, neither of them have a large dynamic range, more compressed tone.)
-
Ugly gestures, beatiful music.
-
That ATTYA clip with the metronome bugs me. To my ears it's like he set the metronome to tempo, put it down and then counted something else. I get that a lot with him, where it sounds like he is not in the groove or even paying attention to the drums and bass. I've put it down to my ears being confused by his use of delays and multiple amps and speakers, but there he had just a Roland JC. It's actually distressing to listen to at times. But it must be me because if I was hearing correctly what I think I'm hearing, no one would play with him. It's really weird, I don't have that experience with any other guitarist (and not all the time with him). It's almost like each of my ears is hearing something different at the same time with that clip and many others of his. Is it just me (almost certainly, I suspect)? If not, what the hell is he doing with time that I don't understand?
-
Originally Posted by Cunamara
-
I see what you're saying. I find that depending on what rhythms your inner ear naturally leans towards, you will hear it one way verus another for someone else. It's almost like those popular "trick your mind" drawings where you're either seeing the shadowed part as one shape and the other (negative space) part as another shape.
The way I hear him playing over this rhythm is this,..
CLAP (metronome), MELODY NOTE, CLAP (metronome), MELODY NOTE. And then he tries to add swing to cadence of the melody line. Or better yet, he is placing each melody note BEHIND each metronome "click". May sound crazy but try dancing (our bopping your head) to the METRONOME rhythm and it may clear up for you. Those of you who used the old Akai MPC 60 drum machines will recognize this in how Pat is playing with the rhythm.
That being said, it's quite refreshing to read this / "hear" you say this about Pat's rhythm. I've always thought that pure melody has been Pat's strongest forte by 10 miles and rhythm his least strongest. He's so melodic that when he throws in a blues line I find it slightly jarring and would rather him stick with the silky sweet melody lines he that ooze out of him.
In a lot of the "accidental" audio that folks have posted online with Pat talking about practicing, rhythm etc he harps on, very strongly about the need to have strong rhythm. And then (by his own admission - there is audio online) there is that awesome Jazz drummer (back in Kansas City) with whom he worked with as a young guitarist who took serious exception to Pat's ability to maintain rock solid rhythms (way back then).
You can tell Pat has worked hard to try to over come this rhythmic "deficit" so to speak.
Anytime I've heard him play over a 4/4 groove (@ Baltica Jazz fest with a female vocalist whose name I should remember is one instance), I have come away underwhelmed unlike Scofield who BITES DOWN HARD into those kinds of rhythms. But give Pat his airy /Jazz swing type beats and he'll wail away over those and make you smile - he's that good.
But to be fair, swing beats are tougher to crack than your contemporary hard "make your head bop" 4/4 grooves. Even Benson who grooves like a bandit, admits in his autobiography that I just finished reading that he confessed to a producer that sometimes "the beat got away" from him. The beats in question were jazz swing beats that he used during his "Boss guitar" days.
This pat playing on Cantaloupe Island. You hear the difference. Herbie's playing is forceful and drives the song forward.
Last edited by West LA Jazz; 12-16-2014 at 03:38 AM.
-
I can't figure out what you guys are talking about here. Metheny has rock solid time. Sometimes he doesn't swing, but his time is solid. I'm not sure I get where you're going with the 4/4 thing.
And Benson has freakishly awesome swing and groove.
Who would be a guitarist that you guys consider to have good time? I can't even figure out what you're talking about.
-
Originally Posted by ecj
Pat’s perfect.
Let me be clear. There is NOTHING wrong with Pat and his fabulous music. ;-)
I totally understand what CUNAMARA is getting at. There is something about the way he (CUNAMARA’S) ear perceives rhythm that doesn’t jibe with how Pat is playing over the metronome. No biggie!
IMHO even though we sometimes get competitive with music (pitting one against the other), any music,.. on in this case, Jazz music doesn’t lend itself to “this person’s music is better than that person’s music”. Meaning there are no absolutes in music as in say certain aspects of mathematics.
Every recorded musician creates music that is intended to put their best foot forward. But that being said, no human being alive – past, present or future has/will have perfect rhythm – even when playing with a mechanized timekeeper such as a metronome or a drum machine.
What Metheny has done is to create a lushly orchestrated synthesized cocoon that is uniquely his to showcase is playing. There is no guitarist with Metheny’s sound and so there is no one to compare him to. (God Bless Lyle Mays!)
(Side note ramble
In my case, I was a drummer before I turned to guitar so I am fascinated by pure rhythms and poly rhythms. I spent many nights listening to the RHYTHM of Pat’s soloing and tried to block out the melody in order to study they way he FELT rhythm. Just like hearing Eminem rap for the first time against a mechanized beat, I was interested in how he (Metheny felt and interpreted rhythm) namely how he MANIPULATED THE RHYTHMIC PLACEMENT OF HIS MELODY LINES. Pat's is doing the same thing in that video where he plays against the metronome.
When I first heard EM, I was thunderstruck. He skittered over the beat in a very different way… but it totally worked. Some the best rappers (and yes, they are vocal drummers) surf down into the grooves of the beat but EM slithers and slides over the beat. To my ear, Pat does the same thing but in a different way.
When I listen to Pat solo especially when he “shakes and bakes” (is the best way I can describe it without using an audio sample) reminds me of EMINEM rap over a beat. He does so in the ATTYA video playing against the metronome.
Or when I first heard Bob Marley’s rhythm section namely ASTON “FAMILYMAN” BARRET on bass playing against his younger brother CARLTON BARRET’S drumming. It was simple but there was something in the syncopation…. I was blown away by how they manipulated the rhythm. It was simple but when you studied it, it was really different.
So all is well with our beloved Metheny.
This might well be a case of …To-mah-toe/ To-may-toe.
-
I'm not trying to defend Metheny. He doesn't need my help I'm just trying to figure out what you guys are talking about. Not hearing it on cantaloupe island, and the clip posted of his clinic has no metronome (he's just warming up). Where's an example of Metheny playing oddly over 4/4 that I can listen to and figure out what you guys are saying.
Hancock is all over that tune, but so is Metheny. They are both absolute geniuses.
Hancock definitely has a more traditional jazz "swing" groove. Metheny does it a little different. His rhythmic concept is different, but he still lays perfectly in the pocket. I think maybe you're reacting more to his weird vocabulary. He doesn't have a very traditional sound, unlike someone like Hancock who sort of fits in the jazz piano tradition.
He definitely sounds different. Not sure if that's what you're trying to describe. Metheny almost creates his own groove around his solos. His time isn't as loose (important clarification that "loose" does not mean "not in the pocket" here) as some of the other modern jazz monsters like the Marsalis bros or Hancock.
-
That's not it for me at least... I just feel that he often gets out of sync. I.e. at around 2:00 he starts a roll of 8th notes with the high notes landing on the even beats. By the end of his run the high notes are not landing on a beat and it sounds sloppy to my ears. And I actually like the sound of playing a bit off the beat, i.e. chasing it for a tiny bit and then throwing in a triplet to catch up as it can accentuate the rhythm. But when I listen to this video the metronome often ends up sounding like noise rather than part of the beat.
Also to clarify - I'm not trying to say that he sucks or anything like that Just trying to advance my own understanding by explaining my observations.
-
He's playing with time a little bit around 2 minutes, but i really don't hear it as "off."
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
-
Originally Posted by soto
Lot's of people do this, e.g. sonny rollins. If you check out metheny live clips on youtube you'll hear that he does this also on the heads of his tunes, presumably to keep them fresh.Last edited by pkirk; 12-18-2014 at 07:56 PM.
-
Originally Posted by Richb
-
Originally Posted by Cunamara
My dearest Cunamara,
The season for sharing and caring is at hand. But I must warn you for at the risk of peril and the loss of life itself, we cannot voice personal tastes (to the contrary) about geniuses who "belong to select group of 'elite connoissieurs' " in an open forum.
But you my friend are a self effacing person. And to be self effacing, is a virtue deserving of the loftiest rewards in this life. That being said,.. run of your life!!! You cannot and must not dare voice contrary motion (thank you John Scofield for hipping me to that term), I mean you cannot - NOT dig certain aspects of the genius in discussion... and dare stand your ground! That my dear friend…. is sheer Folly! :-)
HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO ONE AND ALL!
We learn from every single one of you….
Love You ALL!!!! ;-)
-
Originally Posted by West LA Jazz
Saying that Metheny sucks or that he's not a good player is just ridiculous. He's obviously one of the greats whether you like him or not.
-
I hear a lot of talk of players playing "loose", "free" or "out of time" when it's obvious that the commentor isn't hearing accurately the underlying rhythmic framework. Whether you're talking Billie Holliday or players like Methany, they're not simply playing "not on the beat". There's a very purposeful underlying rhythmic structure there, and they're very deliberately working subdivisions of the beat which are hard for some listeners hear. But the listener's lack of ability to hear it doesn't somehow make the performance sloppy. (There's a "tree falling in the woods" thing there somewhere I guess.)
-
That's a rather circular argument though. It can also be argued that listeners with an exceptional sense of rhythm are the ones finding fault.
I actually don't have a problem with his playing on any of the recordings I have. But in the video posted it doesn't sound like he's grooving with the beat. And if you're used to playing with a strong rhythm section and all of a sudden you're with a dinky metronome in a room full of echo - well that's understandable. I think it is pretty obvious from his live performances that he really uses his emotions to fuel his playing and that aspect was missing as well, so I don't think that performance was characteristic of him.
In the end the only real truth is what our ears tell us. If something sounds bad it doesn't matter if it's deliberate and it doesn't make the listener inferior for not liking it. It just means there is a subjective disagreement in taste. On top of that tastes change and opinions change with time as well. That's what makes life too short
-
If they had a excellent sense of rhythm they'd hear him using a common "play" that's been used in jazz since Louis Armstrong.
I'm all for calling bs on idol worship, but pat is freaking ON in that vid. For chrissakes, he makes PLAYING WITH A METRONOME compelling!
-
Originally Posted by Cunamara
As Mr. B alluded to, he's putting the click on the back beat (2 & 4). At that tempo, it's a admittedly a little hard to lock into if you don't know what you're supposed to be listening for.
1 2 3 4 ...
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
This reminds me of an argument I had with some buddies of mine ages ago about a Malmsteen album where I thought his playing was terrible. Of course everyone told me I suck and that I can't play half as good (not entirely true - at the time I couldn't play 10% as good). Years later I read an interview with him saying he hates that recording because he got too drunk and his playing was too sloppy.
It's also possible I haven't listened to enough of Metheny's playing to have the context for it to sound great. Or maybe I just don't like his music so I want him to sound bad. Who knows! We are all slaves to our perceptions which unfortunately are doomed to be biased in one way or another.
-
Originally Posted by soto
Originally Posted by soto
In response to another poster… (forgive me for not drilling down into the posts to find the name)
I honestly don’t understand why is it such a sin for one of our beloved members to dare to opine that PARTS OF Pat’s playing against a metronome doesn’t jibe with his ear?
I understand Pat is a demi god to many in here.
That being said, I’m sure I am younger than some of you here. I grew up using computers in music for recording (another sin to many) as well as playing in bands without the aid of computers.
Popular modern music (including SOME jazz) has a dirty secret. Time clock sequencing.
But unless we are NOT talking about ABSOLUTES if you put ANY human made track on a computer (which I have done many many many times – Pro Tools, Logic, Cubase etc etc) and map it to an internal click track/time clock, you will find out that no human being has absolute rock solid time. A lack of absolute rock solid time doesn't mean that 4 people with different rhythm sensibilities can spark a groove to make a whole nation tap their feet and/or dance! :-)
The need for ROCK SOLID TIME is why world class drummer DAVID WECKYL occasionally plays with an ear piece which pipes in a “click track” to help him, a world class rhythm keeper stay tight on the Elektric band stuff which yes,.. is sequenced.
It’s the man’s ear. No one is putting Pat down. It doesn’t jibe with his ear that’s all.
Happy Holidays!
From Bar Chords to Bebop
Today, 02:33 PM in Improvisation