Shocking Side-by-Side Test of Fender Amps

[christianm77]

Tried a Pro Jnr IV today.

Sounded NICE with the tele. Real nice.

With a Gibson 275, sounded a little midrangey and 'pinched' but it grew on me as an unreconstructed jazz sound, and I reckon with a speaker swap would sound really good.

Kinda want one now.

So I don't have an embarrassing climb down, I'd say it's OBVIOUSLY the upgrade from III to IV lol.

[orri]

Looks like P12Q is basically the same speaker with alnico instead of ceramic. That response might work fine for rock and country, but probably not for me.
.

That post sounds almost like a jazz song:

That response works fine
But (probably?) not for me
A lucky star will shine
But not for me
With tubes to lead the way
I've found more amps to play
But fewer gigs that pay
in quarantine
...

(sorry for necroposting, I was just reading through this thread and found this amusing and it got me started).

[Alter]

I have both a Princeton reverb and a Pro Junior iv. I'm happy playing anything with both of them, but I prefer the Princeton for jazz and the pro Junior for blues. Although I did play a couple of jazz gigs with an archtop with the pro Junior and it sounded phenomenal.. didn't expect that!

[Greentone]

The Pro Jr is the unsung great amp of the Fender line.