-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
...which blows EVERYBODY'S theories out of the water!! Excellent!
-
06-29-2017 07:58 AM
-
Originally Posted by ruger9
-
Not important but.... it's a brand new "design" based on a mix of classics yet this guitar has no history whatsoever as there were no Gustavsson guitars 60 years ago - so they relic/age it? I see no logic in that at all.
Edit: I forgot to add that this guy's left hand close ups could well be posted in the Technique forum as an example of great technique with no wasted movements. His hand stays in parallel to the neck and his fingers are always close to the strings, slightly arched and ready for the next note.Last edited by whiskey02; 06-29-2017 at 09:00 AM.
-
Originally Posted by Thumpalumpacus
I think this entire discussion is basically BS anyway, because when we talk about sound and tone, there are very few, if any, absolutes... everyone hears things differently. One person's "warm" is another person's "muddy", one person's "clarity" is another person's "bright".
-
Actually, as a tele player of over 20 years, I can tell you, it's ALL about the sum of the parts. Neck material, angle, attatchment, pickups, metal plate, string attachment, body wood, flat peghead, all of it makes a tele. And the sound is subjective and tweakable...but the feel is all tele.
-
Originally Posted by mr. beaumont
+1 to that. Nothing FEELS like a tele. (tele player for 23 years)
Wry shoulder
Today, 03:51 PM in Everything Else