-
ZT Lunchbox is a piece of rubbish designed by and for those who cant hear.
like microwave dinner, convenient and thats it.
"But if you cant hear it does not matter" Jack Lemon
-
11-30-2018 08:56 PM
-
Originally Posted by flush
To produce any kind of bass at all, it had to be on the floor. When I raised it off the floor, it sounded screechy. The louder I played, the worse it sounded.
I was able to get about as much usable volume from my 12 watt Crate practice amp -- because it sounded good at head height.
I just ordered the DV Mark Little Jazz (and traded in my LB). I'll report on it when it arrives, supposed to be 2 weeks.
I know I've posted on this too much. My only defense is that I don't think I've ever owned a piece of gear I got so little use out of.
-
My experience with the LB is that it didn't have anywhere near the usable volume that the advertised 200w would suggest.
solo on 2:15
-
Originally Posted by rpjazzguitar
-
Reviving this thread, since I've used all three amps in the OP.
I've posted elsewhere that I couldn't get a sound I liked from the LB. I think the power rating is very misleading. Not just because it's peak power not rms, but because the amp doesn't have much more usable volume than a practice amp. Others disagree, but that is my impression. I found it almost useless.
The Roland 40x was much better. There's one in the room where my octet rehearses and I've used it on a gig. Plenty loud for what I do. More bells and whistles than I need. Sound is good enough.
I am now using the Little Jazz for almost everything. Big band to quartet rehearsals. I've had it in a big room, but with a quiet audience. I have not had to use it with a loud band in a loud room. Basically, it can get as loud as I want to play. Others will disagree.
The LJ weighs less than the Roland and is a little smaller. I'm very happy with it. I think it may sound a little better than the Roland.
5 Guitars - Neck Pickup - Jazzblues: Danocaster,...
Today, 04:40 AM in Guitar, Amps & Gizmos