The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
  1. #1

    User Info Menu

    Hey.

    Dunno if this idea has been discussed seriously ever, anywhere (probably is - world is large).

    Create an easy system where people can buy in to become partial owner of a recorded musical piece.
    Nothing is easy, I know.

    It would create a situation where the people, who have bought a share, would be interested to promote it in the real world.

    The grand problem is the promotion these days. Well, always has been and will be.

    So, if a musician is sitting in a niche market and desperately tries to widen it, this could be a good idea to try out.

    ----
    I would describe the idea a bit more but it seems like fantasy heh.
    There are those crypto-tokens for such files but that feels kinda.. stupid and seriously limited. There the cash comes
    from trading a piece of of a copy of a real thing - this system doesn't seem to become something really major.

    Well, what do you think?

  2.  

    The Jazz Guitar Chord Dictionary
     
  3. #2

    User Info Menu

    If you can get Taylor Swift to do one. It’ll be a good way to rip a bunch of people off until it all blows up, like penny stocks.

    Probably less work to just apply at Starbucks.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanAllen
    If you can get Taylor Swift to do one. It’ll be a good way to rip a bunch of people off until it all blows up, like penny stocks.

    Probably less work to just apply at Starbucks.
    I meant a share of the concrete recording. Separate from authorship of the notes+harmony+lyrics - thats the unsharable part.

    And it surely would help a lot the less-famous people. If you already are selling enough, there is less and less reasons to go that road.

    You can decide how big part of the share would go - like a typical investment then.

    Also, doing this for a few songs would greatly help the rest of the musician's library.

    Also, there is no restriction for making another recording that would trump the shared one