View Poll Results: Backing Tracks for live gigs
- Voters
- 126. You may not vote on this poll
-
06-25-2015, 09:18 PM #201destinytot Guest
I'm all for Augmented Reality on live gigs.
-
06-25-2015 09:18 PM
-
I was reading a review of a Taylor Swift concert the other day (someone's got to do it), and it sounded as if she only had a live band on stage part of the time, some of the performance was with a backing track:
"There were no musical revelations from the new material, no nuance or interpretation from the CD-like backing tracks and band. Swift seemed content to repeat the album's performances, metronomic and dutiful..."
I find it incredible that people will now pay shed-loads of money to see someone without a real band on stage, and not feel short-changed. But I suppose it's now the norm for these sort of pop stars.
-
Originally Posted by grahambop
As far as interaction goes, a duo with some backing tracks (either prerecorded or looped in real time) experiences interaction, improvisation and creativity. And, as I have admitted before, I would rather be accompanied by my own backing tracks with good time and good changes than suffer the playing of an insensitive drummer or out-of-tune bassist. Of course, the backing tracks will never come close to a really good live band, especially in a "jazz" context, whatever that may be. From the standpoint of business and cultural reality, technology is here to stay.
-
I will always prefer a good musician play over backing tracks over a scars musician playing with a full band, but that's just me.
Sandro
but most I would prefer when they use possibilities of printing technolgy to create special and originbal piece of art....
-
And, as I have admitted before, I would rather be accompanied by my own backing tracks with good time and good changes than suffer the playing of an insensitive drummer or out-of-tune bassist
I mean there's always chance for surprise in it ...
-
I just don't understand everybody is talking about the lack of interaction with other musicians when you use backing tracks, but a solo guitarist doesn't interact with anybody but is okay for him to play alone?? What about the player himself, isn't he an element of surprise? I constantly go around Boston and you can see drummers playing on buckets alone and people still appreciate and give them money wile other are singing over a backing track putting together a show and if you are good and people appreciate that's all it matter. The tricky part is to create an audience because when you have an audience you will have the interaction you need to be inspire and express yourself to a deeper level therefore have more fun.
Sandro
-
Originally Posted by Sandro
+1
-
solo playing does not presume interecation... because it's solo
I do not like backing track when it is there to imitate live player...
it is that simle, just that simple, and nothing else...
-
Playing with lousy players is a nightmare, period. Backing tracks created by the player do not imitate a live player, they ARE a live player, recorded. Same with real-time looping.
-
Originally Posted by ronjazz
-
Originally Posted by ronjazz
-
Just to be clear - solo players are interacting.
With the audience, with the acoustic space, with the flow of the piece, and the moment.
It's shocking how so many are willing to write-off the value of a human being creating music in the moment with listeners.
I was lucky to come up at a time where the band was live and the jukebox was for breaks.Last edited by rictroll; 06-29-2015 at 11:56 PM.
-
Originally Posted by ronjazz
As for the lousy players, why do you hire them? Don't you know who the decent players are? I don't understand it.
Maybe the scene is different here in Europe or something, but I have been going to jazz gigs in the UK for 30 years and I have never seen any musician using a backing track. The nearest I have seen is John Etheridge and Paul Malsom using a live looper on one tune only. And I have seen John Surman using some kind of synth loop, but he was constantly transforming it, recording himself then playing along to it, applying delays to it etc. Not like a static backing track.
-
I think I voted on something random - the question was a real hanging chad.
-
I'm thinking maybe jazz puppet show could take backing tracks to the next level....
-
Originally Posted by cosmic gumbo
-
Originally Posted by ronjazz
wiz
-
Originally Posted by grahambop
So what? Frisell uses loopers all the time. And a static backing track is still far superior to a bad player, period. As for hiring only good players, budget and availability are a real factor. I know ALL the decent players, and they are in high demand, thus not always available. Last week, for instance, I lost the bassist AND drummer the day before the Friday night gig, and not a single accomplished player was available for a rather demanding gig. I didn't have tracks ready for this act, and the result was two players far below the level needed, and a below-par performance . And yes, the scene in Europe is quite different.
By the way, backing tracks can be easily changed, adjusted or even accented with the right technology, but that isn't the point, at all. If one depends on playing for a living, as I do, one finds solutions to the problems of low budgets or lack of top-level players. As I've pointed out before, I don't use tracks for jazz concert gigs. I do use them to make a living on background, function or party gigs, and I enjoy hearing good time and changes. The looper allows lots of creativity, and I have seen several gifted performers utilizing that technology in a very cool, creative way.
If you are a full-time player making a decent living without technology, good for you. If you are not dependent on performing to pay the bills, then you may never bother with it. But I have been a pro for 50 years, and I need to fund my lifestyle, thus I refuse to split $250 up among 3 to play a gig where the music is not the prime interest and where the function or buyer may actually be better served with just me and tracks. Boring? Not for me, or that audience. My tracks swing, have dynamics, modulations, and real intros and endings. I've played many hundreds of jazz trio and quartet gigs with the likes of George Coleman, Teddy Wilson, Alan Dawson, Gray Sargent, etc., and I do 80 concerts a year with a 6-piece African/fusion group which happens to include one of Yo Yo Ma's Silk Road members, who, by the way, uses a looper on his balafon. Not every gig needs to be the World Series, you know, and if I choose to play with loopers and tracks on 25% of my 200+ gigs a year, that's what I will do.
By the way, the exact same discussion raged for years about amplification.
-
Originally Posted by ronjazz
I can see where you would use them on the other types of gigs.
-
The problem with this thread is that the OP did not actually ask a question, so the responses are coming in all across the board. At this point, I am not sure what was being asked either; a great example of how NOT to conduct a poll, I guess.
-
06-30-2015, 01:20 PM #221destinytot Guest
"$250 between three? Luxury!" Cue the Four Yorkshiremen
-
Ron - I saw Bill Frisell in a night spot in Manhattan back in the late Eighties playing solo with a looper and he was quite inventive. I realize that there are many situations where you can expand a solo gig's possibilities with use of a looper. Is there one that you think is more versatile than the others or favor?
I intend to try and get down to see you finally this Friday in Providence. Hope the weather cooperates. What do you do in case of rain assuming you play outside?
-
Originally Posted by mikeSF
These days I think there's some interest in the creative process. For example- the way Ed Sheeran uses looping. Besides that I think the audience is only interested in the end result and they don't care how musicians get there.
-
Originally Posted by Stevebol
-
07-04-2015, 06:33 AM #225destinytot Guest
In the right hands...
1979 L5 CES - Sweden ~$7k
Yesterday, 03:38 PM in For Sale